AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control
Volume 31, Issue 6 , Pages 354-356, October 2003

Do physicians examine patients in contact isolation less frequently? A brief report

  • Sanjay Saint, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Ann Arbor Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, USA
    • Departments of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, USA
    • Patient Safety Enhancement Program, University of Michigan Health System, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Sanjay Saint, MD, MPH, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Room 7E08, 300 NIB, Campus Box 0429, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0429
  • ,
  • Leigh Ann Higgins, MD

      Affiliations

    • Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia, USA
  • ,
  • Brahmajee K Nallamothu, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, USA
  • ,
  • Carol Chenoweth, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, USA

Abstract 

Background

Patients who are hospitalized and infected with multidrug-resistant bacteria are usually placed in contact isolation, which requires hospital personnel to gown and glove before patient examination. Contact isolation with active culture surveillance appears beneficial in preventing the spread of drug-resistant infections; however, contact isolation may impede the ability to examine patients as a result of the additional effort required to gown and glove. We assessed whether patients who are hospitalized and placed under contact precautions are examined less often by second- and third-year medical residents (ie, senior medical residents), and attending physicians during morning rounds.

Method

We conducted a prospective cohort study on the inpatient medical services at 2 university-affiliated medical centers. We directly observed senior medical residents and attending physicians during morning rounds, and recorded the contact precaution status of the patient and whether they were examined by either physician.

Results

Of a total of 139 patients, 31 (22%) were in contact isolation. Senior medical residents examined 26 of 31 patients (84%) in contact isolation versus 94 of 108 patients (87%) not in contact isolation (relative risk, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.81–1.14; P = .58). In comparison, attending physicians examined 11 of 31 patients (35%) in contact isolation versus 79 of 108 patients (73%) not in contact isolation (relative risk, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.30–0.79; P < .001).

Discussion

Attending physicians are about half as likely to examine patients in contact isolation compared with patients not in contact isolation.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by a career development award from the Health Services Research and Development Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs and a Patient Safety Developmental Center Grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (P20-HS11540) (Dr Saint).Presented, in part, at the National Association of Inpatient Physicians 4th Annual National Meeting, Atlanta, GA, March 2001.

PII: S0196-6553(02)48250-8

doi:10.1016/S0196-6553(02)48250-8

AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control
Volume 31, Issue 6 , Pages 354-356, October 2003