Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 35, Issue 9, Pages 569-573 (November 2007)


View previous. 5 of 26 View next.

Microbiologic evaluation of microfiber mops for surface disinfection

William A. Rutala, PhD, MPHabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Maria F. Gergen, MT (ASCP)a, David J. Weber, MD, MPHab

Background

Recently, health care facilities have started to use a microfiber mopping technique rather than a conventional, cotton string mop to clean floors.

Methods

The effectiveness of microfiber mops to reduce microbial levels on floors was investigated. We compared the efficacy of microfiber mops with that of conventional, cotton string mops in 3 test conditions (cotton mop and standard wringer bucket, microfiber mop and standard wringer bucket, microfiber system). Twenty-four rooms were evaluated for each test condition. RODAC plates containing D/E Neutralizing Agar were used to assess “precleaning” and “postcleaning” microbial levels.

Results

The microfiber system demonstrated superior microbial removal compared with cotton string mops when used with a detergent cleaner (95% vs 68%, respectively). The use of a disinfectant did not improve the microbial elimination demonstrated by the microfiber system (95% vs 95%, respectively). However, use of disinfectant did significantly improve microbial removal when a cotton string mop was used (95% vs 68%, respectively).

Conclusion

The microfiber system demonstrated superior microbial removal compared with cotton string mops when used with a detergent cleaner. The use of a disinfectant did not improve the microbial elimination demonstrated by the microfiber system.

a Department of Hospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Health Care System, Chapel Hill, NC

b Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH, Division of Infectious Diseases, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Road, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7030.

 This work received no funding, and there are no financial disclosures to report.

PII: S0196-6553(07)00524-X

doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2007.02.009


View previous. 5 of 26 View next.