AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control
Volume 36, Issue 8 , Pages 537-551, October 2008

Public health law for the collection and reporting of health care–associated infections

  • Benjamin Mason Meier, JD, LLM, MPhil

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Benjamin Mason Meier, JD, LLM, MPhil, Public Health Law Project Manager, Center for Health Policy, Columbia University, 617 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032.
  • ,
  • Patricia W. Stone, PhD, MPH
  • ,
  • Kristine M. Gebbie, RN, DrPH

Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Antimicrobial Resistance, Columbia University, New York, NY

Background

State-based laws for reporting of health care-associated infections (HAI) have developed and changed dramatically in recent years, affecting the costs of reporting and impact on infection rates. It is necessary for practitioners of infection control to understand these changing legal frameworks and their application to practice.

Methods

Employing systematic state-based research, the researchers have documented legislation and administrative regulations for institution-specific HAI reporting, using this information to create a comprehensive resource on state-based laws for mandatory HAI reporting.

Results

As of August 27, 2007, 24 states have adopted laws requiring reporting of HAI rates, with an additional 7 states currently considering legislation that would require HAI reporting and 19 states employing detailed regulation in the absence of any current legislative authorization specific to HAI. This study documents (1) which states require reporting of HAI and, if so, whether this is done by legislation or administrative regulation; (2) whether the specific HAIs to be reported are identified in state law or codified generally as “diseases of public health importance,” with reporting specified by administrative regulation; and (3) what reporting policies and procedures are detailed in law.

Conclusion

Through analysis of the collected information, the researchers have examined the degree to which states have modernized their respective public health laws to approach mandatory reporting by way of general legislation regarding “matters of public health importance” and subsequent detailed administrative regulation to specify those matters.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Antimicrobial Resistance.

PII: S0196-6553(08)00553-1

doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2008.01.015

AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control
Volume 36, Issue 8 , Pages 537-551, October 2008