AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control
Volume 37, Issue 9 , Pages 766-772, November 2009

Is use of the hands-free technique during surgery, a safe work practice, associated with safety climate?

  • Bernadette Stringer, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Bernadette Stringer Consulting, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • ,
  • A. Ted Haines, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Haines T, MD, MSc, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, 1200 Main Street West, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
  • ,
  • Charles H. Goldsmith, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • Ramon Berguer, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Martinez, CA
  • ,
  • Jennifer Blythe, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

published online 03 August 2009.

Background

A better safety climate has been linked to better compliance with safety behaviors. This study assessed whether “management support,” the most commonly measured safety climate dimension, was associated with greater use of the hands-free technique (HFT), a work practice recommended for use during surgery to prevent exposure to blood and body fluids.

Methods

Questionnaires from operating room nurses participating in a test retest reliability study and in training sessions for an intervention study, from 9 hospitals in 3 Canadian provinces, were analyzed.

Results

Response rates in the hospitals varied from 61% to 97%. Four hundred forty-two operating room nurses responded; 16% reported using the HFT approximately 75% or more of the time in surgery, and 39% had received HFT training. Management support and HFT training were each associated with increased HFT use: odds ratio (OR), 6.63; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.89-23.30 and OR, 6.36; 95% CI: 1.97-20.51, respectively. When training occurred in a context of management support, HFT use was further increased: OR, 9.12; 95% CI: 2.71-30.72.

Conclusion

Consistent with previous research linking management support for health and safety to uptake of safety practices, management support and HFT training acted synergistically to increase HFT use most of the time in surgery.

Key Words: Hands-free technique, bloodborne pathogens, health, safety

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflicts of interest: None to report.

PII: S0196-6553(09)00542-2

doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2009.02.014

AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control
Volume 37, Issue 9 , Pages 766-772, November 2009