AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control
Volume 38, Issue 1 , Pages 31-37, February 2010

Internet survey of Foley catheter practices and knowledge among Minnesota nurses

  • Dimitri M. Drekonja, MD

      Affiliations

    • Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN
    • Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Dimitri M. Drekonja, MD, Infectious Diseases (111F), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1 Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417.
  • ,
  • Michael A. Kuskowski, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN
  • ,
  • James R. Johnson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN
    • Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

published online 02 September 2009.

Background

Although nurses insert and care for many Foley catheters, little is known about nurses' attitudes and knowledge regarding indications for catheter use or methods to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI).

Methods

An Internet-based survey was sent to a random sample of registered nurses (RNs) in Minnesota. The survey contained demographic questions and 5-point Likert-scale questions regarding indications for Foley catheter placement and effectiveness of various interventions for preventing CAUTI.

Results

Nurses perceived early catheter removal as the most effective intervention to prevent CAUTI (mean score, 4.5; range 1-5). Compared with other RNs, those reporting additional catheter education were more likely to rate interventions to prevent CAUTI as effective, regardless of whether the interventions actually reduce the incidence of symptomatic CAUTI or asymptomatic bacteriuria/funguria. Intensive care unit RNs were significantly more likely than other RNs to endorse that a Foley catheter was indicated for any given clinical scenario and to endorse antimicrobial-coated catheters as effective in preventing CAUTI. Most respondents reported no institutional guidance regarding catheterization.

Conclusion

Although the surveyed Minnesota RNs demonstrated high-level awareness of the utility of early Foley catheter removal for preventing CAUTI, other aspects of their catheter-related knowledge were concerning. Improving these deficits may help improve catheter-related practice.

Key Words: Urinary catheter, prevention, urinary tract infection, Internet

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflicts of interest: J. R. Johnson has served as a consultant and received research support from Rochester Medical Corp., manufacturer of a nitrofurazone-coated urinary catheter. No other authors have any conflicts.

PII: S0196-6553(09)00660-9

doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2009.05.005

AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control
Volume 38, Issue 1 , Pages 31-37, February 2010