Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 105-111 (March 2010)


View previous. 8 of 19 View next.

Contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms: Current recommendations and actual practice

Sarah A. Clock, PhDa, Bevin Cohen, MPHa, Maryam Behta, PharmDb, Barbara Ross, RN, CICc, Elaine L. Larson, RN, PhD, CICaCorresponding Author Informationemail address

published online 13 November 2009.

Background

Contact precautions are recommended for interactions with patients colonized/infected with multidrug-resistant organisms; however, actual rates of implementation of contact precautions are unknown.

Methods

Observers recorded the availability of supplies and staff/visitor adherence to contact precautions at rooms of patients indicated for contact precautions. Data were collected at 3 sites in a New York City hospital network.

Results

Contact precautions signs were present for 85.4% of indicated patients. The largest proportions were indicated for isolation for vancomycin-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cultures. Isolation carts were available outside 93.7% to 96.7% of rooms displaying signs, and personal protective equipment was available at rates of 49.4% to 72.1% for gloves (all sizes: small, medium, and large) and 91.7% to 95.2% for gowns. Overall adherence rates on room entry and exit, respectively, were 19.4% and 48.4% for hand hygiene, 67.5% and 63.5% for gloves, and 67.9% and 77.1% for gowns. Adherence was significantly better in intensive care units (P < .05) and by patient care staff (P < .05), and patient care staff compliance with one contact precautions behavior was predictive of adherence to additional behaviors (P < .001).

Conclusions

Our findings support the recommendation that methods to monitor contact precautions and identify and correct nonadherent practices should be a standard component of infection prevention and control programs.

a Center for Interdisciplinary Research to Reduce Antimicrobial Resistance, School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY

b Department of Information Services, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY

c Department of Epidemiology, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Elaine L. Larson, Columbia University School of Nursing, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032.

 Financial support was provided by Association for Prevention Teaching and ResearchCenters for Disease Control and Prevention Cooperative Agreement 5U50CD3000-860-21. S.C. was supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research (Grant 5T90NR010824-02) in Columbia University's Training in Interdisciplinary Research to Reduce Antimicrobial Resistance program.

 Conflicts of interest: None to report.

PII: S0196-6553(09)00837-2

doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2009.08.008


View previous. 8 of 19 View next.