Advertisement

Evaluation of single-use masks and respirators for protection of health care workers against mycobacterial aerosols

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Background: The recent increase in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis has spawned a major controversy concerning the degree of respiratory protection needed by health care workers, particularly during sputum-inducing procedures. The objective of thsi study was to measure the filtration efficiencies of a single-use submicron surgical mask, two disposable dust/mist respirators, a dust/mist/fume respoirator, and a high-efficiency particulate air respirator against aerosolized mycobacteria. Facial fit was not addressed.
      Methods: In a specially designed enclosed test apparatus, an aerosol was generated with a Collison nebulizer from a known concentration of Mycobacteria chelonae, used as a surrogate for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Aerosol concentrations were measured with Andersen samplers upstream and downstream of the test masks and respirators, which were heat sealed to a metal plate.
      Results: Mean efficiencies ranged from approximately 97% for the surgical mask and a dust/mist respirator to more than 99% for the high-efficiency particulate aire respirator. Measurements of filter efficiency with an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer for the M. chelonae aerosol and independent challenge tests with latex spheres correlated closely with measurements of M. Chelonae collection efficiency determind with Andersen samplers.
      Conclusions: Analysis of variance and Tukey's method for multiple comparisons indicated that the dust/mist/fume respirator and the HEPA respirator collected M. chelonae with significantly greater efficiency that did either the surgical mask or the dust/mist respirator. Even the least efficient mask tested, however, had a filter efficiency of more than 97% against particles averaging less than 1 μm in aerodynamic diameter.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • American Thoracic Society
        Control of tuberculosis in the United States.
        Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992; 146: 1623-1633
        • Centers for Disease Control
        Nosocomial transmission of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis among HIV-infected persons — Florida and New York.
        MMWR. 1991; 40: 585-591
        • US Department of Labor
        Occupational Safety and health Administration. Occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens, final rule.
        Federal Register. 1991; 56: 64175-64182
        • Centers for Disease Control
        Guidelines for preventing the transmission of tuberculosis in health-care settings, with special focus on HIV-related issues.
        MMWR. 1990; 39 (inclusive pages)
        • Centers for Disease Control
        NIOSH recommended guideline for personal respiratory protection of workers in health-care facilities potentially exposed to tuberculosis. US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, Atlanta1992
        • Rockwod C.A.
        • O'Donoghue D.H.
        The surgical mask: its development, usage, and efficiency.
        AMA Arch Surg. 1960; 80: 963-971
        • Greene V.W.
        • Vesley D.
        Method for ealuating effectiveness of surgical masks.
        J Bacteriol. 1962; 83: 663-667
        • Andersen A.A.
        New sampler for the collection, sizing, and enumeration of viable airborne particles.
        J Bacteriol. 1958; 76: 471-484
        • Dineen P.
        Microbial filtration by surgical masks.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1971; 133: 812-814
        • Wadsworth L.C.
        • Davis W.T.
        Filtration efficiency of face masks: the development of a rapid latex filtration efficiency test methdo for use in simulating bacterial filtration efficiency.
        Filtration Separation. 1982; (Sept/Oct): 393-395
        • Wallace R.J.
        • Swenson J.M.
        • Silcox V.A.
        • Good R.C.
        • Tschen J.A.
        • Stone M.S.
        Spectrum of disease due to rapidly growing mycobacteria.
        Rev Infect Dis. 1983; 5: 657-677
        • Macher J.M.
        Positive-hole correction of multiple-jet impactors for collecting viable microorganisms.
        Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1989; 50: 561-568
        • May K.R.
        The Collison nebulizer: description, performance and application.
        Aerosol Sci. 1973; 4: 235-243
        • Brosseau L.M.
        • Evans J.S.
        • Ellenbecker M.J.
        • Feldstein M.L.
        Collection efficiency of respirators filters challenged with monodisperse latex aerosols.
        Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1989; 50: 544-549
        • Nicholson R.M.
        Standard test method for initial efficiency measurements on flatsheet media.
        in: Fluid filtration: gas, vol 1. ASTM STP 975. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia1986
        • Tuomi T.
        Face seal leakage of half masks and surgical masks.
        Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1985; 46: 308-312
        • Davis W.T.
        Filtration efficiency of surgical masks: the need for more meaningful standards.
        Am J Infect Control. 1991; 19: 16-18