Do physicians examine patients in contact isolation less frequently? A brief report



      Patients who are hospitalized and infected with multidrug-resistant bacteria are usually placed in contact isolation, which requires hospital personnel to gown and glove before patient examination. Contact isolation with active culture surveillance appears beneficial in preventing the spread of drug-resistant infections; however, contact isolation may impede the ability to examine patients as a result of the additional effort required to gown and glove. We assessed whether patients who are hospitalized and placed under contact precautions are examined less often by second- and third-year medical residents (ie, senior medical residents), and attending physicians during morning rounds.


      We conducted a prospective cohort study on the inpatient medical services at 2 university-affiliated medical centers. We directly observed senior medical residents and attending physicians during morning rounds, and recorded the contact precaution status of the patient and whether they were examined by either physician.


      Of a total of 139 patients, 31 (22%) were in contact isolation. Senior medical residents examined 26 of 31 patients (84%) in contact isolation versus 94 of 108 patients (87%) not in contact isolation (relative risk, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.81–1.14; P = .58). In comparison, attending physicians examined 11 of 31 patients (35%) in contact isolation versus 79 of 108 patients (73%) not in contact isolation (relative risk, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.30–0.79; P < .001).


      Attending physicians are about half as likely to examine patients in contact isolation compared with patients not in contact isolation.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect



        • Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC)
        Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance.
        Am J Infect Control. 1995; 23: 87-94
        • Garner JS
        Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals: the hospital infection control practices advisory committee [published erratum, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:214].
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996; 17: 53-80
        • Mayhall CG
        Control of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: it is important, it is possible, and it is cost-effective.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002; 23: 420-423
        • Srinivasan A
        • Song XY
        • Ross T
        • Merz W
        • Brower R
        • Perl TM
        A prospective study to determine whether cover gowns in addition to gloves decrease nosocomial transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in an intensive care unit.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002; 23: 424-428
        • Muto CA
        • Giannetta ET
        • Durbin LJ
        • Simonton BM
        • Farr BM
        Cost-effectiveness of perirectal surveillance cultures for controlling vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002; 23: 429-435
        • Boyce JM
        • Mermel LA
        • Zervos MJ
        • Rice LB
        • Potter-Bynoe G
        • Giorgio C
        • et al.
        Controlling vancomycin-resistant enterococci [published erratum, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:211] [comments].
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995; 16: 634-637
        • Byers KE
        • Anglim AM
        • Anneski CJ
        • Germanson TP
        • Gold HS
        • Durbin LJ
        • et al.
        A hospital epidemic of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus: risk factors and control.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001; 22: 140-147
        • Ostrowsky BE
        • Trick WE
        • Sohn AH
        • Quirk SB
        • Holt S
        • Carson LA
        • et al.
        Control of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus in health care facilities in a region.
        N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1427-1433
        • Slaughter S
        • Hayden MK
        • Nathan C
        • Hu TC
        • Rice T
        • Van Voorhis J
        • et al.
        A comparison of the effect of universal use of gloves and gowns with that of glove use alone on acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in a medical intensive care unit.
        Ann Intern Med. 1996; 125: 448-456
        • Montecalvo MA
        • Jarvis WR
        • Uman J
        • Shay DK
        • Petrullo C
        • Rodney K
        • et al.
        Infection-control measures reduce transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in an endemic setting.
        Ann Intern Med. 1999; 131: 269-272
        • Kirkland KB
        • Weinstein JM
        Adverse effects of contact isolation [letter].
        Lancet. 1999; 354: 1177-1178
        • Peel RK
        • Stolarek I
        • Elder AT
        Is it time to stop searching for MRSA? Isolating patients with MRSA can have long term implications.
        BMJ. 1997; 315: 58
        • Saint S
        • Atherton S
        • Lipsky BA
        • McDonald L
        • Strausbaugh L
        Controlling the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci with contact precautions: time for a randomized trial.
        Int J Infect Dis. 1999; 3: 179-180