Impact of the flu mask regulation on health care personnel influenza vaccine acceptance rates

Published:April 19, 2016DOI:
      Achieving high vaccination rates of health care personnel (HCP) is critical in preventing influenza transmission from HCP to patients and from patients to HCP; however, acceptance rates remain low. In 2013, New York State adopted the flu mask regulation, requiring unvaccinated HCP to wear a mask when in areas where patients are present. The purpose of this study assessed the impact of the flu mask regulation on the HCP influenza vaccination rate. A 13-question survey was distributed electronically and manually to the HCP to examine their knowledge of influenza transmission and the influenza vaccine and their personal vaccine acceptance history and perception about the use of the mask while working if not vaccinated. There were 1,905 respondents; 87% accepted the influenza vaccine, and 63% were first-time recipients who agreed the regulation influenced their vaccination decision. Of the respondents who declined the vaccine, 72% acknowledge HCP are at risk for transmitting influenza to patients, and 56% reported they did not receive enough information to make an educated decision. The flu mask protocol may have influenced HCP's choice to be vaccinated versus wearing a mask. The study findings supported that HCP may not have adequate knowledge on the morbidity and mortality associated with influenza. Regulatory agencies need to consider an alternative approach to increase HCP vaccination, such as mandating the influenza vaccine for HCP.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Influenza vaccine 1980–1981. Recommendation of the Public Health Service Immunization Practices Advisory Committee, Center for Disease Control, Department of Health and Human Services; Atlanta, Georgia.
        Ann Intern Med. 1980; 93: 466-468
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Immunization of health-care personnel: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP).
        MMWR Weekly Rep. 2011; 60: 7
        • Carmen W.F.
        • Elder A.G.
        • Wallace L.A.
        Effect of influenza vaccination of health-care workers on mortality of elderly people in long-term care: a randomized controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2000; 355: 93-97
        • Hayward A.C.
        • Harling R.
        • Wetten S.
        Effectiveness of influenza vaccine programme for care home staff to prevent death, morbidity and health service use among residents: cluster randomized control trial.
        Br Med J. 2006; 333: 1241
        • Potter J
        • Stott DJ
        • Roberts MA
        • Elder AG
        • O'Donnell B
        • Knight PV
        • et al.
        Influenza vaccination of health care workers in long-term care hospitals reduces the mortality of elderly patients.
        J Infect Dis. 1997; 175: 1-6
        • Stewart A.
        • Cox M.A.
        Developing a Model State Law.
        George Washington University, Washington D.C.2011
        • Daines R.
        • New York State Commissioner of Health
        Mandatory flu vaccine for health care workers.
        (Albany (NY); New York State Department of Health and Human Services)2009
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Reallocating influenza A and H1N1 vaccine.
        (Atlanta (GA); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)2009
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Seasonal influenza vaccine supply and distribution in the United States.
        (Atlanta (GA); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)2009
      2. New York State Department of Health and Human Services. Prevention of influenza transmission by healthcare and residential facility and agency personnel. New York (NY): New York Department of Health.

      3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Flu activity during the 2013-2014 season. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

        • Saxen H.
        • Virtanen M.
        Randomized, placebo-controlled double blind study on the efficacy of influenza immunization on absenteeism of health care workers.
        Pediatr Infect Dis. 1999; 18: 779-783
        • Wilde J.A.
        • McMillan J.A.
        • Serwomt J.
        Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in health care professionals: a randomized trial.
        JAMA. 1999; : 908-913
        • Carrico R.
        • Wiemken T.
        • Westhusing K.
        • Christensen D.
        • McKinney W.P.
        Health care personnel immunization programs: an assessment of knowledge and practice among infection preventionists in US health care facilities.
        Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41: 581-584
        • Corace K.
        • Prematunge C.
        • McCarthy A.
        • Nair R.
        • Roth V.
        • Hayes T.
        • et al.
        Predicting influenza vaccination uptake among health care workers: what are the key motivators?.
        Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41: 679-684
        • Llupià A.
        • Mena G.
        • Olivé V.
        • Quesada S.
        • Aldea M.
        • Sequear V.
        • et al.
        Evaluating influenza vaccination campaigns beyond coverage: a before-after study among health care workers.
        Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41: 674-678