Contamination of health care personnel during removal of contaminated gloves

Published:January 09, 2019DOI:
      In simulations of contaminated glove removal, 37% of health care personnel using their typical doffing technique contaminated their skin with a fluorescent solution. The frequency of contamination was significantly lower when the technique recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was used versus not used (8 of 34, 24% vs 29 of 66, 44%). In simulations in which only the palm of the glove was contaminated, a modified doffing technique, to minimize the risk for contact with contaminated surfaces, reduced contamination of personnel.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Tomas ME
        • Kundrapu S
        • Thota P
        • Sunkesula VC
        • Cadnum JL
        • Mana TS
        • et al.
        Contamination of health care personnel during removal of personal protective equipment.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2015; 175: 1904-1910
        • Morgan DJ
        • Rogawski E
        • Thom KA
        • Johnson JK
        • Perencevich EN
        • Shardell M
        • et al.
        Transfer of multidrug-resistant bacteria to healthcare workers' gloves and gowns after patient contact increases with environmental contamination.
        Crit Care Med. 2012; 40: 1045-1051
        • Shrestha SK
        • Sunkesula VC
        • Kundrapu S
        • Tomas ME
        • Nerandzic MM
        • Donskey CJ
        Acquisition of Clostridium difficile on hands of healthcare personnel caring for patients with resolved C. difficile infection.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016; 37: 475-477
      1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sequence for putting on personal protective equipment (PPE). Available from: Accessed October 1, 2018.

        • Lai JY
        • Guo YP
        • Or PP
        • Li Y
        Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances.
        Am J Infect Control. 2011; 39: 104-111
        • Gleser M
        • Schwab F
        • Solbach P
        • Vonberg RP
        Modified gloves: a chance for the prevention of nosocomial infections.
        Am J Infect Control. 2018; 46: 266-269
      2. Emory University. “Beak Method” glove removal technique. Available from: Accessed October 1, 2018.

        • Tomas ME
        • Sunkesula VC
        • Kundrapu S
        • Wilson BM
        • Donskey CJ
        An intervention to reduce health care personnel hand contamination during care of patients with Clostridium difficile infection.
        Am J Infect Control. 2015; 43: 1366-1367
        • Tomas ME
        • Nerandzic MM
        • Cadnum JL
        • Mana TS
        • Jencson A
        • Sunskesula V
        • et al.
        A novel, sporicidal formulation of ethanol for glove decontamination to prevent Clostridium difficile hand contamination during glove removal.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016; 37: 337-339
        • Casanova LM
        • Rutala WA
        • Weber DJ
        • Sobsey MD
        Effect of single versus double-gloving on virus transfer to healthcare workers’ skin and clothing during removal of personal protective equipment.
        Am J Infect Control. 2012; 40: 369-374