Measurement of the microbial barrier effectiveness of sterilization containers in terms of the log reduction value for prevention of nosocomial infections


      The microbial barrier properties of 216 sterilization containers of 4 central sterile supply departments of different hospitals were measured using a microbial challenge test.


      Uncovered thermoresistant plates filled with Sabouraud agar were placed on the base of the containers prior to sterilization. After sterilization, the containers were exposed to a defined microbial aerosol and periodic atmospheric pressure reductions of 10 to 70 hPa in an exposure chamber. After exposure and incubation of the entire containers, colony growth was registered as colony forming units (CFU) on the plates and the control plates to calculate the barrier effectiveness in terms of the logarithmic reduction value (LRV).


      Two out of 11 standard containers with paper filters and 9 out of 79 containers with textile filters showed no growth on the plates. The mean colony numbers were 222 CFU/600 cm2 (standard container with paper filter) and 209 CFU/ 600 cm2 (container with textile filter). Fourteen out of 15 containers with permanent plastic filters did not show any growth on the plates. No recontamination was observed in 18 of 111 half-size containers. The mean colony numbers of the recontaminated half-size containers were 110 (paper filter) and 34 CFU per 300 cm2 (textile filter). The LRVs of the full-size and half-size containers tested ranged between 1.08 and >4.


      As shown in this study, the microbial barrier effectiveness of sterilization containers in the routine clinical setting can be tested with a quantitative microbial challenge test at intervals of 1 year to eliminate defect or ineffective containers as potential causal factors for nosocomial infections. An LRV of >4 should be envisaged as the target assurance level.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. International Organization for Standardization. Draft ISO 11607–1 Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices: Part 1: Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and packaging systems. 2004. ISO copyright office, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Geneva 20; 2004.

      2. European Committee for Standardization CEN. EN 556-1: Requirements for medical devices to be designated “STERILE”: Part 1: Requirements for terminally sterilized medical devices. 2001. CEN, rue de Stassart 36, B-1050 Bruessel; 2001.

        • Dunkelberg H.
        • Rohmann S.
        Event-related test for evidence of sterile integrity of wrapped medical devices at the 1:1,000,000 level.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006; (in press)
        • Dunkelberg H.
        • Wedekind S.
        Preliminary results for a new final package test to assess the quality of sterile package systems.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004; 25: 26-29
      3. The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). F1608–00 Standard test method for microbial ranking of porous packaging materials (exposure chamber method). ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959 United States; 2002.

      4. European Committee for Standardization CEN. EN 868-1: Packaging materials and systems for medical devices which are to be sterilized: Part 1: General requirements and test methods. 1997. CEN, rue de Stassart 36, B-1050 Bruessel; 1997.

        • Junghannss U.
        • Winterfeld S.
        • Gabele L.
        • Kulow U.
        Hygienic-microbiological and technical testing of sterilizer container systems.
        Zentr Steril. 1999; 7: 154-162
        • Butt W.E.
        • Bradley D.V.
        • Mayhew R.B.
        • Schwartz R.S.
        Evaluation of the shelf life of sterile instrument packs.
        Oral Surg Oral Pathol. 1991; 72: 650-654
        • Klapes N.A.
        • Greene V.W.
        • Langholz A.C.
        • Hustinger C.
        Effect of long-term storage on sterile status of devices on surgical packs.
        Infect Control. 1987; 8: 289-293
        • Webster J.
        • Lloyd W.
        • Ho P.
        • Burridge C.H.
        • George N.
        Rethinking sterilization practices: evidence for event-related outdating.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003; 24: 622-624
        • Bhumsirikul W.
        • Bhumsirikul P.
        • Pongchairerks P.
        Long-term storage of small surgical instruments in autoclaved packages.
        Asian J Surg. 2003; 26: 202-204
        • Schwartz R.
        • Davis R.
        Safe storage times for sterile dental packs.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990; 70: 297-300