Adverse outcomes associated with contact precautions: A review of the literature


      Contact Precautions (CP) are a standard method for preventing patient-to-patient transmission of multiple drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in hospital settings. With the ongoing worldwide concern for MDROs including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and broadened use of active surveillance programs, an increasing number of patients are being placed on CP. Whereas few would argue that CP are an important tool in infection control, many reports and small studies have observed worse noninfectious outcomes in patients on CP. However, no review of this literature exists.


      We systematically reviewed the literature describing adverse outcomes associated with CP. We identified 15 studies published between 1989 and 2008 relating to adverse outcomes from CP. Nine were higher quality based on standardized collection of data and/or inclusion of control groups.


      Four main adverse outcomes related to CP were identified in this review. These included less patient-health care worker contact, changes in systems of care that produce delays and more noninfectious adverse events, increased symptoms of depression and anxiety, and decreased patient satisfaction with care.


      Although CP are recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as an intervention to control spread of MDROs, our review of the literature demonstrates that this approach has unintended consequences that are potentially deleterious to the patient. Measures to ameliorate these deleterious consequences of CP are urgently needed.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • van den Broek P.J.
        Historical perspectives for the new millennium.
        in: Wenzel R.P. Chapter I. Prevention and control of nosocomial infections. 4th ed. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2003: 3-14
        • Snider G.L.
        Tuberculosis then and now: a personal perspective on the last 50 years.
        Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126: 237-243
        • Garner J.S.
        • Simmons B.P.
        Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals.
        Infect Control. 1983; 4: 245-325
        • Fine L.
        • Wachspress M.
        • Grauber D.N.
        Psychological adaptation of patients during treatment of acute leukaemia in life island isolator.
        Adv Exp Med Biol. 1969; 3: 27-34
        • Garner J.S.
        and the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals.
        Am J Infect Control. 1996; 24: 24-52
        • Gammon J.
        The psychological consequences of source isolation: a review of the literature.
        J Clin Nurs. 1999; 8: 13-21
        • Teare E.L.
        • Barrett S.P.
        Stop the ritual of tracing colonized people.
        BMJ. 1997; 314: 665-666
        • Muto C.A.
        • Jernigan J.A.
        • Ostrowsky B.E.
        • Richet H.M.
        • Jarvis W.R.
        • Boyce J.M.
        • et al.
        SHEA. SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus.
        Am J Infect Control. 2007; 35: 73-85
        • Cooper B.S.
        • Stone S.P.
        • Kibbler C.C.
        • Cookson B.D.
        • Roberts J.A.
        • Medley G.F.
        • et al.
        Isolation measures in the hospital management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): systemic review of the literature.
        BMJ. 2004; 329: 533
        • Aboelela S.W.
        • Saiman L.
        • Stone P.
        • Lowy F.D.
        • Quiros D.
        • Larson E.
        Effectiveness of barrier precautions and surveillance cultures to control transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms: a systemic review of the literature.
        Am J Infect Control. 2006; 34: 484-494
        • Weber S.G.
        • Huang S.S.
        • Oriola S.
        • Huskins W.C.
        • Noshkin G.A.
        • Harriman K.
        • et al.
        Legislative mandates for use of active surveillance cultures to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci: position statement from the joint SHEA and APIC Task Force.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007; 28: 249-260
      1. Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L, and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, 2007 guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings, June 2007. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease control and prevention.

      2. Sack K. Deadly bacteria found to be more common. New York Times, October 17, 2007. Available at:

        • Farr B.M.
        What to think if the results of the National Institutes of Health randomized trail of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus control measures are negative (and other advice to young epidemiologists): a review and an au revoir.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006; 27: 1096-1106
        • Khan F.A.
        • Khakoo R.A.
        • Hobbs G.R.
        Impact of contact isolation on health care workers at a tertiary care center.
        Am J Infect Control. 2006; 34: 408-413
      3. Illinois General Assembly. Bill HB0378. 2007. Available at: Accessed February 1, 2008.

      4. Kussman MJ. VHA directive 2007-002. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration. January 12, 2007. Available at:

        • Davis K.A.
        • Stewart J.J.
        • Crouch H.K.
        • Florez C.E.
        • Hospenthal D.R.
        Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization at admission and its effect on subsequent MRSA infection.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39: 776-782
        • Lucet J.C.
        • Grenet K.
        • Armand-Lefevre L.
        • Harnal M.
        • Bouvet E.
        • Regnier B.
        • et al.
        High prevalence of carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at hospital admission in elderly patients: implications for infection control strategies.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005; 26: 121-126
        • Salgado C.D.
        • Farr B.M.
        What proportion of hospital patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus are identified by clinical microbiological cultures?.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006; 27: 116-121
        • Diekema D.J.
        • Edmond D.J.
        Look before you leap: active surveillance for multidrug-resistant organisms.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44: 1101-1107
        • Kirkland K.
        • Weinstein J.
        Adverse effects of contact isolation.
        Lancet. 1999; 354: 1177-1178
        • Saint S.
        • Higgins L.A.
        • Nallamothu B.K.
        • Chenoweth C.
        Do physicians examine patients in contact isolation less frequently?.
        Am J Infect Control. 2003; 31: 354-357
        • Evans H.L.
        • Shaffer M.M.
        • Hughes M.G.
        • Smith R.L.
        • Chong T.W.
        • Raymond D.P.
        • et al.
        Contact isolation in surgical patients: a barrier to care?.
        Surgery. 2003; 134: 180-187
        • Klein B.S.
        • Perloff W.H.
        • Maki D.G.
        Reduction of nosocomial infection during pediatric intensive care by protective isolation.
        N Engl J Med. 1989; 320: 1714-1721
        • Goldszer R.C.
        • Tamplin E.
        • Yokoe D.S.
        • Shadick N.
        • Bardon C.G.
        • Johnson P.A.
        • et al.
        A program to remove patients from unnecessary contact precautions.
        J Clin Outcomes Manage. 2002; 9: 553-556
        • Stelfox H.T.
        • Bates D.W.
        • REdelmeier D.A.
        Safety of patients isolated for infection control.
        JAMA. 2003; 290: 1899-1905
        • Cosgrove S.E.
        • Sakoulas G.
        • Perencevich E.N.
        • Schwaber M.J.
        • Karchmer A.W.
        • Carmeli Y.
        Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2003; 36: 53-59
        • Knowles H.E.
        The experience of infectious patients in isolation.
        Nurs Times. 1993; 89: 53-56
        • Koenig H.G.
        • Meador K.G.
        • Cohen H.J.
        • Blazer D.G.
        Depression in elderly hospitalized patients with medical illness.
        Arch Intern Med. 1988; 148: 1929-1936
        • Koenig H.G.
        • Meador K.G.
        • Shelp F.
        • Goli V.
        • Cohen H.J.
        • Blazer D.G.
        Major depressive disorder in hospitalized medically ill patients: an examination of young and elderly male veterans.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39: 881-890
        • von Ammon Cavanaugh S.
        • Furlanetto L.M.
        • Creech S.D.
        • Powell L.H.
        Medical illness, past depression, and present depression: a predictive triad for in-hospital mortality.
        Am J Psychiatry. 2001; 158: 43-48
        • Kathol R.G.
        • Wenzel R.P.
        Natural history of symptoms of depression and anxiety during inpatient treatment on general medicine wards.
        J Gen Intern Med. 1992; 7: 287-293
        • Kennedy P.
        • Hamilton L.R.
        Psychological impact of the management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients with spinal cord injury.
        Spinal Cord. 1997; 35: 617-619
        • Gammon J.
        Analysis of the stressful effects of hospitalization and source isolation on coping and psychological constructs.
        Int J Nurs Pract. 1998; 4: 84-96
        • Tarzi S.
        • Kennedy P.
        • Stone S.
        • Evans M.
        Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: psychological impact of hospitalization and isolation in an older adult population.
        J Hosp Infect. 2001; 49: 250-254
        • Catalano G.
        • Houston S.H.
        • Catalano M.C.
        • Butera A.S.
        • Jennings S.M.
        • Hakala S.M.
        • et al.
        Anxiety and depression in hospitalized patients in resistant organism isolation.
        South Med J. 2003; 96: 141-145
        • Covinsky K.E.
        • Fortinsky R.H.
        • Palmer R.M.
        • Kresevic D.M.
        • Landefeld C.S.
        Relation between symptoms of depression and health status outcomes in acutely ill hospitalized older persons.
        Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126: 417-425
        • Gasink L.B.
        • Singer K.R.
        • Fishman N.O.
        • Holmes W.C.
        • Weiner M.G.
        • Bilker W.B.
        • et al.
        Contact isolation for infection control in hospitalized patients: is patient satisfaction affected?.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008; 29: 275-278
        • Ward D.
        Infection control: reducing the psychological effects of isolation.
        Br J Nurs. 2000; 9: 162-170
        • Lewis A.M.
        • Gammon J.
        • Hosein I.
        The pros and cons of isolation and containment.
        J Hosp Infect. 1999; 43: 19-23
      5. Joint Commission Resources 2004. Available at: Accessed February 1, 2008.

        • Needleman J.
        • Buerhaus P.
        • Mattke S.
        • Stewart M.
        • Zelevinsky K.
        Nurse staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1715-1722
        • von Elm E.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Egger M.
        • Pocock S.J.
        • Gotzsche P.C.
        • Vandenbroucke J.P.
        STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening of the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for reporting observational studies.
        Ann Intern Med. 2007; 147: 573-577
        • Davies H.
        • Rees J.
        Psychological effects of isolation nursing (1): mood disturbance.
        Nurs Stand. 2000; 14: 36-38
        • Rees J.
        • Davies H.
        Psychological effects of isolation nursing (2): patient satisfaction.
        Nurs Stand. 2000; 14: 32-36
        • Weissman J.S.
        • Schneider E.C.
        • Weingart S.N.
        • et al.
        Comparing patient-reported hospital events with medical record review: do patients know something hospitals do not?.
        Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149: 100-108