Identifying opportunities for quality improvement in surgical site infection prevention

Published:February 09, 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.10.027

      Background

      This study evaluated surgical site infection (SSI) prevention strategies at a network of university hospitals to identify interventions that may be required to improve compliance with guidelines.

      Methods

      Qualitative methods were used for thematic analysis of institutional tools and protocols, and transcripts of interviews with 7 surgical division heads and 11 professional managers of quality improvement or infection prevention and control at 7 hospitals. They were asked about awareness of, and accountability for, SSI prevention, and current and recommended strategies to promote compliance.

      Results

      Despite awareness of SSI prevention guidelines and the presence of organizational factors thought necessary for quality improvement (coordinators, champions), most sites had not reviewed their own practice and implemented corrective strategies. Barriers included use of passive educational strategies, lack of clinician accountability, limited implementation of point-of-care tools, and an absence of performance data.

      Conclusion

      The sites involved in this evaluation and others interested in increasing compliance with SSI prevention guidelines might implement education and performance data in tandem with accountabilities that trigger action, more actively engage champions to promote SSI prevention, create or update and incentivize use of tools such as standard orders, and encourage greater teamwork through organizational support of quality improvement.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mangram A.J.
        • Horan T.C.
        • Pearson M.L.
        • Silver L.C.
        • Jarvis W.R.
        Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999; 20: 250-278
        • Kirkland K.B.
        • Briggs J.P.
        • Trivette S.L.
        • Wilkinson W.E.
        • Sexton D.J.
        The impact of surgical site infections in the 1990s.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999; 20: 725-730
        • Perencevich E.N.
        • Sands K.E.
        • Cosgrove S.E.
        • Guadagnoli E.
        • Meara E.
        • Platt R.
        Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge.
        Emerg Infect Dis. 2003; 9: 126-203
      1. 100 ,000 Lives Campaign. Prevent surgical site infections. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Available at: http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Topics/PatientSafety/SurgicalSiteInfections. Accessed January 15, 2007.

      2. National Health Service. Winning ways: working together to reduce healthcare infection in England. Department of Health, United Kingdom, 2003. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/ Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/Browsable/DH_4095070. Accessed January 15, 2007.

      3. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. Royal College of Physicians, Edinburgh, July 2000. Available at: http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/45/index.html. Accessed January 15, 2007.

      4. Rural and Regional Health and Aged Care Services Division. Preventing surgical site infections. Victorian Government Department of Human Services, 2005. Available at: http://www.health.vic.gov.au/sssl/interventions/surgical.htm. Accessed January 15, 2007.

      5. Safer Healthcare Now! Campaign. Prevent surgical site infections. Canadian Patient Safety Institute, 2006. Available at: http://www.saferhealthcarenow.ca. Accessed January 15, 2007.

        • Baker G.R.
        • Norton P.G.
        • Flintoft V.
        • Blais R.
        • Brown A.
        • Cox J.
        • et al.
        The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada.
        Can Med Assoc J. 2004; 170: 1678-1686
        • Greenhalgh T.
        • Robert G.
        • MacFarlane F.
        • Bate P.
        • Kyriakidou O.
        Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations.
        Milbank Q. 2004; 82: 581-629
        • Lavis J.N.
        • Robertson D.
        • Woodside J.M.
        • McLeod C.B.
        • Abelson J.
        How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?.
        Milbank Q. 2003; 81: 221-248
        • Gagliardi A.R.
        • Fenech D.
        • Eskicioglu C.
        • Nathen A.B.
        • McLeod R.
        Factors influencing antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical site infection prevention practice in general surgery: a review of the literature.
        Can J Surg. 2009; (In press)
        • Stake R.E.
        Case studies.
        in: Denzin N.K. Lincoln Y.S. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA1998: 236-246
        • Auerbach C.F.
        • Silverstein L.B.
        Qualitative data: an introduction to coding and analysis.
        New York; University Press, New York2003
        • Strauss A.
        • Corbin J.
        Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.
        Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA1998
        • Pope C.
        • Ziebland S.
        • Mays N.
        Analysing qualitative data.
        Br Med J. 2000; 320: 114-116
        • Kaufman D.M.
        Applying educational theory in practice.
        Br Med J. 2003; 326: 213-216
        • Davis D.
        • O'Brien MA.
        • Freemantle N.
        • Wolf F.M.
        • Mazmanian P.
        • Taylor-Vaisey A.L.
        Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior?.
        J Am Med Assoc. 1999; 282: 867-874
        • Lockyer J.
        • Gondocz S.T.
        • Thivierge R.L.
        Knowledge translation: the role and place of practice reflection.
        J Cont Ed Health Prof. 2004; 24: 50-56
        • Mazmanian P.E.
        • Mazmanian P.M.
        Commitment to change: theoretical foundations, methods and outcomes.
        J Cont Ed Health Prof. 1999; 19: 200-207
        • Thompson G.N.
        • Estabrooks C.A.
        • Degner L.F.
        Clarifying the concepts in knowledge transfer: a literature review.
        J Adv Nurs. 2006; 53: 691-701
        • Lansisalmi H.
        • Kivimaki M.
        • Aalto P.
        • Ruoranen R.
        Innovation in healthcare: a systematic review of recent research.
        Nurs Sci Q. 2006; 19: 66-72
        • Garg A.X.
        • Adhikari N.K.
        • McDonald H.
        • Rosas-Arellano M.P.
        • Devereaux P.J.
        • Beyene J.
        • et al.
        Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes.
        J Am Med Assoc. 2005; 293: 1223-1238
        • Dy S.M.
        • Garg P.P.
        • Nyberg D.
        • Dawson P.B.
        • Pronovost P.J.
        • Morlock L.
        • et al.
        Are critical pathways effective for reducing postoperative length of stay?.
        Med Care. 2003; 41: 637-648
        • Pestotnik S.L.
        • Classen D.C.
        • Evans R.S.
        • Burke J.P.
        Implementing antibiotic practice guidelines through computer-assisted decision support: clinical and financial outcomes.
        Ann Intern Med. 1996; 124: 884-890
        • Frighetto L.
        • Marra C.A.
        • Stiver H.G.
        • Bryce E.A.
        • Jewesson P.J.
        Economic impact of standardized orders for antimicrobial prophylaxis program.
        Ann Pharmacother. 2000; 34: 154-160
        • Sapyta J.
        • Riemer M.
        • Bickman L.
        Feedback to clinicians: theory, research, and practice.
        J Clin Psychol. 2005; 61: 145-153
        • Galvin R.S.
        • McGlynn E.A.
        Using performance measurement to drive improvement: a road map for change.
        Med Care. 2003; 41: 48-60
        • Jamtvedt G.
        • Young J.M.
        • Kristoffersen D.T.
        • O'Brien M.A.
        • Oxman A.D.
        Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15: 433-436
        • Hysong S.J.
        • Best R.G.
        • Pugh J.A.
        Audit and feedback and clinical practice guideline adherence: making feedback actionable.
        Implement Sci. 2006; 1: 9
        • Lemieux-Charles L.
        • McGuire W.
        What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature.
        Med Care Res Rev. 2006; 63: 263-300
        • Tan J.A.
        • Naik V.N.
        • Lingard L.
        Exploring obstacles to proper timing of prophylactic antibiotics for surgical site infections.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15: 32-38
        • Bradley E.H.
        • Holmboe E.S.
        • Mattera J.A.
        • Roumanis S.A.
        • Radford M.J.
        • Krumholz H.M.
        The roles of senior management in quality improvement efforts.
        J Healthcare Manage. 2003; 48: 15-28
        • Mannion R.
        • Davies H.T.O.
        • Marshall M.N.
        Cultural characteristics of “high” and “low” performing hospitals.
        J Health Organ Manage. 2005; 19: 431-439