Advertisement

Application of cost/benefit analysis for surgical gown and drape selection: A case study

Published:February 13, 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.10.031

      Background

      The selection of medical textiles is an important subject for the health care sector in terms of benefits and costs. The basic cost calculation does not always yield to proper results in product selection; it would even mislead. It is usually a complicated task to give a decision whether to use reusable or single-use products, especially when the patient and surgeons lives are in consideration. The objective of the present paper is to carry out a cost/benefit study to help hospital managers and surgical team in comparing reusable and single-use surgical gowns and drapes.

      Methods

      A detailed case study was carried out to determine the net benefits and costs associated with reusable and single-use surgical gown and drape use in the University of Gaziantep Hospital. The Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to evaluate qualitative benefit data. The relevant data were determined through the literature research and interviews with the doctors, administrators, and personnel of related departments (such as infection control, cleaning, and others) in the hospital. The benefit/cost ratios of the alternatives have been examined, and a sensitivity analysis has been carried out to measure the impact of changes in costs and benefits.

      Conclusion

      After the study, it is concluded that, even though cost is relatively higher, single-use gown and drape sets provide the highest benefit rates. Reduction of prices of single-use sets will make them more competitive and attractive in the health care sector.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Hailey MK. Identification of the major cost drivers within a medical nonwovens pipeline. Unpublished Master of Science Thesis, North Carolina State University; 2003.

      2. EDANA. Available at: http://www.medeco.edana.org/story.cfm?section=|medeco_infection_prevention_products&story=surgical_drapes_gowns.xml. 2007. Accessed June 15, 2008.

        • Kovacs G.T.
        • Clarke S.
        • Burger H.G.
        • Healy D.L.
        • Vollenhoven B.
        Surgival or medical treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: a cost benefit analysis.
        Gynecol Endocrinol. 2002; 16: 53-55
        • Wang S.J.
        • Middleton B.
        • Prosser L.A.
        A cost benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care.
        Am J Med. 2003; 114: 397-403
        • Udvarhelyi I.S.
        • Colditz G.A.
        • Rai A.
        • Epstein A.M.
        Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses in the medical literature: are the methods being used correctly?.
        Ann Intern Med. 1992; 117: 172
        • Puzniak L.A.
        • Gillespie K.N.
        • Leet T.
        • Kollef M.
        • Mundy L.M.
        A cost-benefit analysis of gown use in controlling vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus transmission: is it worth the price?.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004; 25: 418-424
        • Garibaldi R.A.
        • Maglio S.
        • Lerer T.
        • Becker D.
        • Lyons R.
        Comparison of nonwoven and woven gown and drape fabric to prevent intraoperative wound contamination and postoperative infection.
        Am J Surg. 1986; 152: 505-509
        • Baldwin B.C.
        • Fox I.L.
        • Russ C.
        Affect of disposable draping on wound infection rate.
        VA Med. 1981; 108: 477
        • Moylan J.A.
        • Fitzpatrick K.T.
        • Davenport K.E.
        Reducing wound infections: improved gown and drape barrier performance.
        Arch Surg. 1987; 122: 152-157
        • Bellchamers J.
        • Harris J.M.
        • Cullinan P.
        • Gaya H.
        • Pepper J.R.
        A prospective study of wound infection in coronary artery surgery.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999; 15: 45-50
        • Badner B.
        • Zelner L.
        • Merchant R.
        • Laufman H.
        A fresh look at cost of hospital laundry vs disposables.
        Inst Laundry. 1973; 17: 8-13
        • Laufman H.
        • Riley L.
        • Badner B.
        • Zelner L.
        Use of disposable products in surgical products in surgical practice.
        Arch Surg. 1976; 111: 20-26
        • Murphy L.
        Cost/benefit study of reusable and disposable OR draping materials.
        J Healthcare Materiel Manage. 1993; 11: 44-48
        • DiGiacomo J.C.
        • Odom J.W.
        • Ritota P.C.
        • Swan K.G.
        Cost containment in the operating room: use of reusable versus disposable clothing.
        Am Surg. 1992; 58: 654-656
      3. MARTEC research report. What are the full comparable life-cycle costs of re-usable and single-use gowns and drapes? Available at: http://medicalfabrics.dupont.com/Medical_Fabrics/en_GB. 2001. Accessed June 15, 2008.

        • Lizzi A.M.
        • Almada G.C.
        • Veiga G.
        • Carbone N.
        Cost-effectiveness of reusable surgical drapes versus disposable non-woven drapes in a Latin American Hospital.
        Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36: 122-125
        • Yılankırkan N.
        Investigation of the non-woven fabric production process technologies and a cost-benefit analysis for the usage of medical textiles. Unpublished Master of Science Thesis.
        University of Gaziantep, Department of Industrial Engineering, Gaziantep2006
        • Baykasoglu A.
        • Dereli T.
        • Yilankirkan N.
        Tekrar kullanılabilir ve tek kullanımlık medikal tekstil ürünleri seçiminde fayda-maliyet analizi YA/EM’2006: Yöneylem Araştırması/Endüstri Mühendisliği Kongresi XXVI (in Turkish).
        Ulusal Kongresi. 2006; 1: 402-405
        • Wedley C.W.
        • Choo E.U.
        • Schoner B.
        Magnitude adjustment for AHP benefit/cost ratios.
        Eur J Operational Res. 2001; 133: 342-351
        • Saaty T.L.
        Decision making for leaders: the analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world.
        Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont, CA1982
        • Saaty T.L.
        Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytical hierarchy process.
        RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA1994
        • Baykasoglu A.
        • Özen S.H.
        Performance evaluation of EU business centers in Turkey.
        Proceedings of the Fifth GAP Engineering Congress. 2006; : 172-181
        • Chin K.
        • Chiu S.
        • Tummala R.V.M.
        An evaluation of success factors using the AHP to implement ISO 14001-based EMS.
        Int J Qual Reliability Manage. 1999; 16: 341-361
        • Tummala V.M.R.
        • Chin K.S.
        • Ho S.H.
        Assessing success factors for implementing CE: a case study in Hong Kong electronics industry by AHP.
        Int J Production Econ. 1997; 49: 265-283
        • Laufman H.
        • Belkin N.L.
        • Meyer K.K.
        A critical review of a century's progress in surgical apparel: how far have we come?.
        Am Coll Surg. 2000; 191: 554-568
      4. Expert Choice. Collaborative decision support software. Available at: http://www.expertchoice.com/. Accessed June 15, 2008.