Advertisement

Sharps injury reduction using a sharps container with enhanced engineering: A 28 hospital nonrandomized intervention and cohort study

      Background

      The decrease in reported sharps injuries (SI) in the United States has markedly slowed. Additional devices and strategies need investigation. Sharps containers are associated with SI, and more than 90% of these injuries are related to container design. This study addresses the hypothesis that containers with enhanced engineering can reduce SI.

      Methods

      In a before/after intervention study from 2006 to 2008, we examined the impact of conversion to a sharps container with enhanced engineering (the Device) on SI categories in 14 Ascension Health hospitals (study group). The Device’s safety features included large horizontal aperture, sensitive counterbalanced door, large atrium, and passive overfill prevention. Study group results were also compared with a control cohort of 14 contemporaneous size-matched, Ascension Health hospitals (control group).

      Results

      The Device was associated with significant reductions in after-procedure (−30%), disposal-related (−57%), and container-associated (−81%) SI in the study group. No significant reductions occurred in container-associated sharps injuries in the control group. Hospitals using the Device had significantly fewer total SI than control hospitals.

      Conclusion

      Enhanced aperture design can significantly reduce container-associated sharps injuries. Other factors contributing to reduced injuries may include 1-hand deposit, safe closure, hand restriction, and preassembly. These results, from a country where sharps safety devices are widespread, are particularly applicable to countries where safety devices are not extensively used.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard 1910.1030. US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. January 18, 2001. Available from: http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=10051. Accessed September 30, 2009.

        • Jagger J.
        • Perry J.
        • Gomaa A.
        • Phillips E.K.
        The impact of US policies to protect healthcare workers from bloodborne pathogens: the critical role of safety-engineered devices.
        J Infect Public Health. 2008; 1: 62-71
        • Massachusetts Department of Public Health Occupational Health Surveillance Program
        Sharps injuries among hospital workers in Massachusetts, 2007: findings from the Massachusetts Sharps Injury Surveillance System.
        (Available from) (Accessed November 10, 2008)
      2. International Healthcare Worker Safety Center, University of Virginia. US EPINet Needlestick and Sharps Injury Surveillance Network. Sharps injury data report for 2007. Available from: http://healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/epinet/SOI/2007-NSI.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2009.

      3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC’s seven healthcare safety challenges. Issues in healthcare settings. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. August 23, 2001. Available from: www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/about_challenges.html. Accessed September 10, 2005.

        • Sellick J.A.
        • Hazamy P.A.
        • Mylotte J.M.
        Influence of an educational program and mechanical opening needle disposal boxes on occupational needlestick injuries.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991; 12: 725-731
        • Weltman A.C.
        • Short L.J.
        • Mendelson M.H.
        • Lilienfeld D.E.
        • Rodriguez M.
        Disposal-related sharps injuries at a New York City teaching hospital.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995; 16: 268-274
        • Zafar A.B.
        • Butler C.
        • Podgorny J.M.
        • Mennonna P.A.
        • Gaydos L.A.
        • Sandiford J.A.
        Effect of a comprehensive program to reduce needlestick injuries.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997; 18: 712-715
        • Haiduven D.J.
        • Phillips E.S.
        • Clemons K.V.
        • Stevens D.A.
        Percutaneous injury analysis: consistent categorization, effective reduction methods, and future strategies.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995; 16: 582-589
        • Krasinski K.
        • LaCouture R.
        • Holzman R.S.
        Effect of changing needle disposal systems on needle puncture injuries.
        Infect Control. 1987; 8: 59-62
        • English J.F.B.
        Reported hospital needlestick injuries in relation to knowledge/skill, design, and management problems.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992; 13: 259-264
        • Grimmond T.
        • Creech R.
        • Taylor C.
        • Pandur R.
        • Kampen R.
        • Kable W.
        • et al.
        Sharps injury reduction using the Sharpsmart Reusable Sharps Management System.
        J Hosp Infect. 2003; 54: 232-238
        • Jagger J.
        • Bentley M.
        Disposal-related sharp object injuries.
        Adv Exposure Prev. 1995; 1 (1,2,6,7,11)
        • Hatcher I.B.
        Reducing sharps injuries among health care workers: a sharps container quality improvement project.
        Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002; 28: 410-414
        • Gartner K.
        Impact of a needleless intravenous system in a university hospital.
        Am J Infect Cont. 1992; 20: 75-79
        • McCormick R.D.
        • Maki D.G.
        Epidemiology of needle-stick injuries in hospital personnel.
        Am J Med. 1981; 70: 928-932
        • Jacobson J.T.
        • Burke J.P.
        • Conti M.T.
        Injuries of hospitals employees from needles and sharp objects.
        Infect Control. 1983; 4: 100-102
        • Linnemann C.C.
        • Cannon C.
        • DeRonde M.
        • Lamphear B.
        Effect of educational programs, rigid sharps containers, and universal precautions on reported needlestick injuries in healthcare workers.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991; 12: 214-219
        • Weinstein S.A.
        Disposable needle and syringe containers.
        Infect Control. 1985; 6: 41-43
        • Roberts S.
        • Scharf L.
        Appropriate needle disposal: implementing change to reduce injury and lessen risk.
        Am J Infect Control. 1986; 14: A32-A34
        • Osterman C.A.
        Relation of new disposal unit to risk of needle puncture injuries.
        Hosp Topics. 1975; 53: 12-13
        • McCormick R.D.
        • Meisch M.G.
        • Ircink F.G.
        • Maki D.G.
        Epidemiology of hospital sharps injuries: a 14-year prospective study in the Pre-AIDS and AIDS eras.
        Am J Med. 1991; 91: S301-S307
        • Gershon R.R.M.
        • Pearse L.
        • Grimes M.
        • Flanagan P.A.
        • Vlahov D.
        The impact of multifocused interventions on sharps injury rates at an acute care hospital.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999; 20: 806-811
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Selecting, evaluating, and using sharps disposal containers. 1998. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, National Institutes for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-111.
        (Available from) (Accessed November 8, 2009)
      4. Gillen M, McNary J, Lewis J, Davis M, Boyd A, Schuller M, et al. 2003. Sharps-related injuries in California healthcare facilities: pilot study results from the Sharps Injury Surveillance Registry. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:113–121.

        • US Food and Drug Administration
        Medical device use safety: incorporating human factors engineering into risk management. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Division of Device User Programs and Systems Analysis, Office of Communication, Education, and Radiation Programs.
        (Available from) (Accessed April 21, 2010)
        • Hyman W.
        Human factors analysis of needle safety devices.
        J Clin Eng. 2002; 27: 280-286
        • Jagger J.
        Reducing occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens: where do we stand a decade later?.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996; 17: 573-575
        • Pugliese G.
        • Germanson T.P.
        • Bartley J.
        • Luca J.
        • Lamerato L.
        • Cox J.
        • et al.
        Jagger J. Evaluating sharps safety devices: meeting OSHA’s intent.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001; 22: 456-458
        • Jagger J.
        • Pearson R.
        A view from the cutting edge.
        Infect Control. 1987; 8 (editorial): 51-52
        • Stringer B.A.
        deadly design.
        Can Nurse. 1993; 89: 34-36
        • Jagger J.
        • Bentley M.
        Safe disposal of safety devices.
        Adv Exposure Prev. 1999; 4 (1,17)