Advertisement
Major article| Volume 41, ISSUE 4, P349-353, April 2013

Download started.

Ok

Temporal changes in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis banding in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and implications for outbreak investigations

Published:October 26, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.014

      Background

      Patients are often screened with surveillance cultures to discern transmissions vs transformation of an isolate to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. To determine the amount of time between which isolates could be considered genetically similar by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, isolate change over time within single patients was studied.

      Methods

      A minimum of 4 isolates per patient, separated by at least 2 months, were collected from previously frozen stores. Visual comparison of banding patterns was conducted, and percent relatedness was calculated.

      Results

      Twenty-eight isolates from 6 patients were studied. No isolate differed by more than 3 bands before 150 days, and the average percent difference per band was 3.7%. The isolates diverged genetically as a linear function of number of bands over time (good model fit intrapatient r2 = 0.42; poor model fit interpatient r2 = 0.0062).

      Conclusion

      Trajectory of genetic variation appears to be isolate/patient specific; however, commonalities exist and tested isolates were relatively stable out to 150 days.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bhavnani S.M.
        • Drake J.A.
        • Forrest A.
        • Deinhart J.A.
        • Jones R.N.
        • Biedenbach D.J.
        • et al.
        A nationwide, multicenter, case-control study comparing risk factors, treatment, and outcome for vancomycin-resistant and -susceptible enterococcal bacteremia.
        Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000; 36: 145-158
        • Stosor V.
        • Peterson L.R.
        • Postelnick M.
        • Noskin G.A.
        Enterococcus faecium bacteremia: does vancomycin resistance make a difference?.
        Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158: 522-527
        • Salgado C.D.
        The risk of developing a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bloodstream infection for colonized patients.
        Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36: S175.e5-S175.e8
        • Olivier C.N.
        • Blake R.K.
        • Steed L.L.
        • Salgado C.D.
        Risk of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bloodstream infection among patients colonized with VRE.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008; 29: 404-409
        • Singh A.
        • Goering R.V.
        • Simjee S.
        • Foley S.L.
        • Zervos M.J.
        Application of molecular techniques to the study of hospital infection.
        Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006; 19: 512-530
        • Murray B.E.
        Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections.
        N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 710-721
        • Friedman C.R.
        • Whitney C.G.
        It's time for a change in practice: reducing antibiotic use can alter antibiotic resistance.
        J Infect Dis. 2008; 197: 1082-1083
        • Barbosa T.M.
        • Levy S.B.
        The impact of antibiotic use on resistance development and persistence.
        Drug Resist Update. 2000; 3: 303-311
        • Tenover F.C.
        • Arbeit R.D.
        • Goering R.V.
        • Mickelsen P.A.
        • Murray B.E.
        • Persing D.H.
        • et al.
        Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing.
        J Clin Microbiol. 1995; 33: 2233-2239
        • Goering R.V.
        Pulsed field gel electrophoresis: a review of application and interpretation in the molecular epidemiology of infectious disease.
        Infect Genet Evol. 2010; 10: 866-875
        • Baden L.R.
        • Thiemke W.
        • Skolnik A.
        • Chambers R.
        • Strymish J.
        • Gold H.S.
        • et al.
        Prolonged colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in long-term care patients and the significance of “clearance”.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2001; 33: 1654-1660
        • Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
        Twentieth Informational Supplement M100-S20.
        Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne [PA]2010
        • Turabelidze D.
        • Kotetishvili M.
        • Kreger A.
        • Morris Jr., J.G.
        • Sulakvelidze A.
        Improved pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing vancomycin-resistant enterococci.
        J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38: 4242-4245
      1. CHEF Map comparison of S. aureus strains. Available from http://microgen.ouhsc.edu/s_aureus/s_aureus_home.htm. Accessed March 31, 2011.

        • DiazGranados C.A.
        • Zimmer S.M.
        • Klein M.
        • Jernigan J.A.
        Comparison of mortality associated with vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcal bloodstream infections: a meta-analysis.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41: 327-333
        • Edmond M.B.
        • Ober J.F.
        • Dawson J.D.
        • Weinbaum D.L.
        • Wenzel R.P.
        Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcal bacteremia: natural history and attributable mortality.
        Clin Infect Dis. 1996; 23: 1234-1239
        • Pelz R.K.
        • Lipsett P.A.
        • Swoboda S.M.
        • Diener-West M.
        • Powe N.R.
        • Brower R.G.
        • et al.
        Vancomycin-sensitive and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcal infections in the ICU: attributable costs and outcomes.
        Intensive Care Med. 2002; 28: 692-697
        • DiazGranados C.A.
        • Jernigan J.A.
        Impact of vancomycin resistance on mortality among patients with neutropenia and enterococcal bloodstream infection.
        J Infect Dis. 2005; 191: 588-595
        • Kaye K.S.
        • Engemann J.J.
        • Mozaffari E.
        • Carmeli Y.
        Reference group choice and antibiotic resistance outcomes.
        Emerg Infect Dis. 2004; 10: 1125-1128
        • Arbeit R.D.
        • Slutsky A.
        • Barber T.W.
        • Maslow J.N.
        • Niemczyk S.
        • Falkinham 3rd, J.O.
        • et al.
        Genetic diversity among strains of Mycobacterium avium causing monoclonal and polyclonal bacteremia in patients with AIDS.
        J Infect Dis. 1993; 167: 1384-1390
        • Tenover F.C.
        • Arbeit R.
        • Archer G.
        • Biddle J.
        • Byrne S.
        • Goering R.
        • et al.
        Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
        J Clin Microbiol. 1994; 32: 407-415
        • Sader H.S.
        • Pignatari A.C.
        • Leme I.L.
        • Burattini M.N.
        • Tancresi R.
        • Hollis R.J.
        • et al.
        Epidemiologic typing of multiply drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from an outbreak in an intensive care unit.
        Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993; 17: 13-18
      2. Fitzmaurice G. Davidian M. Verbeke G. Molenberghs G. Longitudinal Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton [FL]2008