Advertisement
Brief report| Volume 41, ISSUE 10, P925-927, October 2013

Replicating changes in hand hygiene in a surgical intensive care unit with remote video auditing and feedback

Published:March 13, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.12.011
      Using remote video auditing (RVA) and real-time feedback, we replicated health care workers hand hygiene in a second intensive care unit. During the first 4 weeks using RVA without feedback, the compliance rate was 30.42%. The rate during the 64-week postfeedback period (initial 16 and 48 weeks maintenance) with RVA and feedback exceeded 80% on average. These data demonstrate that improved hand hygiene was achieved and sustained with the use of RVA and feedback.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Armellino D.
        • Hussain E.
        • Schilling M.E.
        • Senicola W.
        • Eichorn A.
        • Dlugacz Y.
        • et al.
        Using high-technology to enforce low-technology safety measures: the use of third-party remote video auditing and real-time feedback in healthcare.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54: 1-7
        • Boyce J.M.
        • Pittet D.
        Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Association for Professionals in Infection. Control/Infectious Diseases Society of America.
        MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2002; 51: 1-4
        • Berhe M.
        • Edmond M.B.
        • Bearman G.
        Measurement and feedback of infection control process measures in the intensive care unit: impact on compliance.
        Am J Infect Control. 2006; 34: 537-539
        • Bischoff W.E.
        • Reynolds T.M.
        • Sessler C.N.
        • Edmond M.B.
        • Wenzel R.P.
        Hand washing compliance by health care workers: the impact of introducing an accessible, alcohol-based hand antiseptic.
        Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160: 1017-1021
        • Lankford M.G.
        • Zembower T.R.
        • Trick W.E.
        • Hacek D.M.
        • Noskin G.A.
        • Peterson L.R.
        Influence of role models and hospital design on hand hygiene of healthcare workers.
        Emerg Infect Dis. 2003; 9: 217-223
        • Pittet D.
        • Simon A.
        • Hugonnet S.
        • Pessoa-Silva C.L.
        • Sauvan V.
        • Perneger T.V.
        Hand hygiene among physicians: performance, beliefs, and perceptions.
        Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141: 1-8
        • Swoboda S.M.
        • Earsing K.
        • Strauss K.
        • Lane S.
        • Lipsett P.A.
        Electronic monitoring and voice prompts improve hand hygiene and decrease nosocomial infections in an intermediate care unit.
        Crit Care Med. 2004; 32: 358-363
        • Muller M.P.
        • Detsky A.S.
        Public reporting of hospital hand hygiene compliance: helpful of harmful?.
        JAMA. 2010; 304: 1116-1117