Advertisement
Major article| Volume 41, ISSUE 12, P1258-1263, December 2013

Surgical site infection after cesarean section: Implementing 3 changes to improve the quality of patient care

Published:August 12, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.04.020

      Background

      Surgical site infection (SSI) is an important complication of cesarean section (CS) delivery and a key quality indicator of patient care.

      Methods

      A baseline assessment was undertaken to determine SSI rates, and subsequently a quality improvement program was introduced, followed by repeat surveillance. Data were collected during in-hospital stays and for up to 30 days after CS during both periods. Interventions in the quality improvement program included the use of nonabsorbable sutures for skin closure, use of clippers instead of razors, and use of 2% ChloraPrep for skin disinfection before incision.

      Results

      A total of 710 patients were surveyed before the interventions, and 824 patients were surveyed after the interventions. Of these, 114 (16%) had an SSI before the interventions, and 40 (4.9%) had an SSI after the interventions (P < .001; odds ratio, 0.27), with 90% and 83%, respectively, detected after hospital discharge. In multivariate analysis, obesity (P = .002) and the use of absorbable suture materials for skin closure (P = .008) were significantly associated with a higher SSI rate before the interventions; however, only obesity was associated with a higher SSI rate after the quality program.

      Conclusion

      Surveillance of SSI rates after CS followed by 3 interventions contributed to a significant reduction in SSI rate and improved patient care.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Humphreys H.
        Preventing surgical site infection. Where now?.
        J Hosp Infect. 2009; 73: 316-322
        • Johnson A.
        • Young D.
        • Reilly J.
        Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance.
        J Hosp Infect. 2006; 64: 30-35
        • Horan T.C.
        • Andrus M.
        • Dudeck M.A.
        CDC/NHSN surveillance definitions of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting.
        Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36: 309-332
        • Mei-Sheng Riley M.
        • Suda D.
        • Tabsh K.
        • Flood A.
        • Pegues D.A.
        Reduction of surgical site infections in low transverse caesarean section at a university hospital.
        Am J Infect Control. 2012; 40: 820-825
        • Duff P.
        A simple checklist for preventing major complications associated with caesarean delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 1393-1396
        • Darouiche R.O.
        • Wall Jr., M.J.
        • Itani K.M.
        • Ottersono M.F.
        • Webb A.L.
        • Carrick M.M.
        • et al.
        Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis.
        N Eng J Med. 2010; 362: 18-26
        • van Schalkwyk J.
        • Van Eyk N.
        Antibiotics prophylaxis in obstetric procedures.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010; 32: 878-892
        • Smaill F.M.
        • Gyte G.M.
        Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after caesarean section.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 1 (CD007482)
        • Sullivan S.A.
        • Smith T.
        • Chang E.
        • Hulsey T.
        • Vandorsten J.P.
        • Soper D.
        Administration of cefazolin prior to skin incision is superior to cefazolin at cord clamping in preventing postcesarean infectious morbidity: a randomised controlled trial.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196: 455.e1-455.e5
        • Killian C.A.
        • Graffunder E.M.
        • Vinciguerra T.J.
        • Venezia R.A.
        Risk factors for surgical-site infections following caesarean section.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001; 22: 613-617
        • Cardosa Del Monte M.C.
        • Pinto Neto A.M.
        Postdischarge surveillance following caesarean section: the incidence of surgical site infection and associated factors.
        Am J Infect Control. 2010; 38: 467-472
        • Whitby M.
        • McLaws M.L.
        • Collopy B.
        • Looke D.F.
        • Poidge S.
        • Henderson B.
        • et al.
        Postdischarge surveillance: can patients reliably diagnose surgical wound infections?.
        J Hosp Infect. 2002; 52: 155-160
        • Olsen M.A.
        • Butler A.M.
        • Willers D.M.
        • Devkota P.
        • Gross G.A.
        • Fraser V.J.
        Risk factors for surgical site infection after low transverse caesarean section.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008; 29: 477-484
        • Ward V.P.
        • Charlett A.
        • Fagan J.
        • Crawshaw S.C.
        Enhanced surgical site infection surveillance following caesarean section: experience of a multicentre collaborative post-discharge system.
        J Hosp Infect. 2008; 70: 166-173
        • CAESAR Study Collaborative Group
        Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR).
        BJOG. 2010; 117: 1366-1376
        • Güngördük K.
        • Asicioglu O.
        • Celikkol O.
        • Ark C.
        Tekirdağ Aİ. Does saline irrigation reduce the wound infection in caesarean delivery?.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 30: 662-666
        • MacLean A.B.
        Caesarean section wound infection.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 30: 645-646
        • Kaimal A.J.
        • Zlatnik M.G.
        • Cheng Y.W.
        • et al.
        Effect of a change in policy regarding the timing of prophylactic antibiotics on the rate of postcesarean delivery surgical-site infections.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199: 310.e1-310.e5
        • Rauk P.N.
        Educational intervention, revised instrument sterilization methods and comprehensive preoperative skin preparation protocol reduce cesarean section surgical site infections.
        Am J Infect Control. 2010; 38: 319-323
        • Dykorn O.A.
        • Kristoffersen M.
        • Walberg M.
        Reducing post-caesarean surgical wound infection rate: an improvement project in a Norwegian maternity clinic.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21: 206-210
        • Bärwolff S.
        • Sohr D.
        • Geffers C.
        • Brandt C.
        • Vonberg R.
        • Halle H.
        • et al.
        Reduction of surgical site infections after cesarean delivery using surveillance.
        J Hosp Infect. 2006; 64: 156-161
        • Gould D.
        Caesarean section, surgical site infection and wound management.
        Nurs Stand. 2007; 21: 57-62