To the Editor:
Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a major health care-related problem in Brazil. SSIs are considered the third most prevalent sort of infection in our country. A national study carried out by the Ministry of Health of Brazil in 1999 found SSI in 11% of all surgical procedures analyzed.
1
The recent review article by Chlebicki et al,
2
whose meta-analysis suggested no benefit of using chlorhexidine to prevent SSI, sparked a debate in our service regarding our practice of chlorhexidine use.Chlorhexidine is a broad-spectrum topical antiseptic agent capable of decreasing colonization by bacteria from the skin with effectiveness against multidrug-resistant organisms (eg, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus).
3
This antiseptic agent has the potential to prevent other types of health-related infections besides SSIs. A recent randomized clinical trial published by Climo et al4
studied the effect of daily bathing/showering with chlorhexidine in preventing nosocomial bloodstream infections in patients admitted to intensive care units. This multicenter study assessed 7,727 patients and observed a significant decrease in bloodstream infection rates in patients at risk for infection.Considering that the effect of chlorhexidine is a topical one, we believe that the inclusion of contaminated surgeries in the meta-analysis was inappropriate, although a subgroup analysis excluding these surgeries did not change the results. Furthermore, preoperative prophylaxis differed among the studies, possibly contributing to the differences in outcome. Analyzing the types of surgeries covered in the studies reveals a remarkable diversity of surgical sites, which could affect infection risk based on timing and complexity of surgical procedures and disease severity. Interestingly, the meta-analysis and randomized clinical trial had a similar number of patients. Despite the different methodologies and outcomes of previous studies, we conclude that the protective effect of chlorhexidine is real.
Considering the lack of well-designed studies to allow a meta-analysis with little bias, we remain in favor of continuing preoperative chlorhexidine baths/showers for the prevention of SSIs, especially in orthopedic and cardiac implant surgeries.
References
- Surgical site: National criteria infections related to health care.National Agency Health Surveillance, Brasilia [Brazil]2009: 1-19 ([in Portuguese])
- Preoperative chlorhexidine shower or bath for prevention of surgical site infection: a meta-analysis.Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41: 167-173
- Impact of chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths on reducing incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization in hematology and oncology patients.Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41: 345-348
- Effect of daily chlorhexidine bathing on hospital-acquired infection.N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 533-542
Article info
Publication history
Published online: August 12, 2013
Identification
Copyright
© 2013 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Preoperative chlorhexidine shower or bath for prevention of surgical site infection: A meta-analysisAmerican Journal of Infection ControlVol. 41Issue 2
