Advertisement

A comparison of the microbiologic profile of indwelling versus external urinary catheters

      We studied the microbiology reports of urine cultures collected from external (condom catheters) versus indwelling (Foley) catheters. The equal prevalence of Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococci in samples from both catheter types calls into question the practice of switching from indwelling to external catheters to decrease catheter-associated bacteriuria.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lo E.
        • Nicolle L.
        • Classen D.
        • Arias K.M.
        • Podgorny K.
        • Anderson D.J.
        • et al.
        Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care hospitals.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008; 29: S41-S50
        • Saint S.
        • Kaufman S.R.
        • Rogers M.A.
        • Baker P.D.
        • Ossenkop K.
        • Lipsky B.A.
        Condom versus indwelling urinary catheters: a randomized trial.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006; 54: 1055-1061
        • Trautner B.W.
        • Patterson J.E.
        • Petersen N.J.
        • Hysong S.
        • Horwitz D.
        • Chen J.
        • et al.
        Quality gaps in documenting urinary catheter use and infectious outcomes.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013; 34: 793-799
        • Hooton T.M.
        • Bradley S.F.
        • Cardenas D.D.
        • Colgan R.
        • Geerlings S.E.
        • Rice J.C.
        • et al.
        Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 50: 625-663
        • Maki D.G.
        • Tambyah P.A.
        Engineering out the risk for infection with urinary catheters.
        Emerg Infect Dis. 2001; 7: 342-347
        • Ryu K.H.
        • Kim Y.B.
        • Yang S.O.
        • Lee J.K.
        • Jung T.Y.
        Results of urine culture and antimicrobial sensitivity tests according to the voiding method over 10 years in patients with spinal cord injury.
        Kor J Urol. 2011; 52: 345-349
        • Soothill J.
        Use of bacteriophages in the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.
        Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2013; 11: 909-915
        • Fisher J.F.
        • Kavanagh K.
        • Sobel J.D.
        • Kauffman C.A.
        • Newman C.A.
        Candida urinary tract infection: pathogenesis.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52: S437-S451
        • Perry A.G.
        • Potter P.A.
        Clinical nursing skills & techniques.
        7th ed. Mosby, St Louis [MO]2010
        • Saint S.
        • Wiese J.
        • Amory J.K.
        • Bernstein M.L.
        • Patel U.D.
        • Zemencuk J.K.
        • et al.
        Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters?.
        Am J Med. 2000; 109: 476-480