Advertisement

Using microfiber and steam technology to improve cleaning outcomes in an intensive care unit

      The use of microfiber and steam technology may be seen as a novel cleaning method that can improve the outcome of cleaning. We describe its use in an intensive care setting, its impact on vancomycin-resistant enterococci acquisition, and the importance of ensuring adequate education of cleaning staff. Such new methods can have a significant impact on the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms, provided systems are in place to ensure that the methodology is adhered to and that cleaning hours are adequate.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gillespie E.
        • Wilson J.
        • Lovegrove A.
        • Scott C.
        • Abernethy M.
        • Kotsanas D.
        • et al.
        Environment cleaning without chemicals in clinical settings.
        Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41: 461-463
        • Abernethy M.
        • Gillespie E.
        • Snook K.
        • Stuart R.
        Microfiber and steam for environmental cleaning during an outbreak.
        Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41: 1134-1135
        • Carling P.
        • Bartley J.
        Evaluating hygienic cleaning in health care settings: what you do not know can harm your patients.
        Am J Infect Control. 2010; 38: S41-S50
      1. Hand Hygiene Australia. HHA manual. Available from: http://www.hha.org.au/ForHealthcareWorkers/manual.aspx. Accessed August 29, 2014.

        • Drees M.
        • Snydman D.
        • Schmid C.
        • Barefoot L.
        • Hansjosten K.
        • Vue P.
        • et al.
        Prior environmental contamination increases the risk of acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 46: 678-685
        • De Angelis G.
        • Cataldo M.
        • De Waute C.
        • Venturiello S.
        • La Torre G.
        • Cauda R.
        • et al.
        Infection control and prevention measures to reduce the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014; 69: 1185-1192
        • Goodman E.
        • Platt R.
        • Bass R.
        • Onderdonk A.
        • Yokoe D.
        • Huang S.
        Impact of environmental cleaning intervention on the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci on surfaces in intensive care unit rooms.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008; 29: 593-599
        • Weber D.
        • Anderson D.
        • Rutala W.
        The role of the surface environments in healthcare-associated infections.
        Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2013; 26: 338-344
        • Gillespie E.
        • Scott C.
        • Wilson J.
        • Stuart R.
        Pilot study to measure cleaning effectiveness in health care.
        Am J Infect Control. 2012; 40: 477-478
        • Boyce J.
        • Havill N.
        • Havill H.
        • Mangione E.
        • Bumigan D.
        • Moore B.
        Comparison of fluorescent marker systems with 2 quantitative methods of assessing terminal cleaning practices.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011; 32: 1187-1193