Advertisement
American Journal of Infection Control
Advanced searchSave search
Major article| Volume 43, ISSUE 12, P1281-1287, December 01, 2015

Personal protective equipment for the Ebola virus disease: A comparison of 2 training programs

Published:August 12, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.07.007
Personal protective equipment for the Ebola virus disease: A comparison of 2 training programs
Previous ArticlePrevention and control practices for human noroviruses in long-term care facilities in South Carolina
Next ArticleRisk factors for surgical site infections after neurosurgery: A focus on the postoperative period

      Highlights

      • •
        Despite current recommendations, training courses for Ebola virus disease personal protective equipment (PPE) have not been evaluated to date.
      • •
        We evaluated basic and enhanced PPE with conventional and reinforced training programs.
      • •
        Critical error frequency was between 3% and 40% at the third training session.
      • •
        Basic PPE appears to be easier to use than enhanced PPE.
      • •
        The reinforced training program achieved better proficiency for both PPE types.

      Background

      Personal protective equipment (PPE) for preventing Ebola virus disease (EVD) includes basic PPE (B-PPE) and enhanced PPE (E-PPE). Our aim was to compare conventional training programs (CTPs) and reinforced training programs (RTPs) on the use of B-PPE and E-PPE.

      Methods

      Four groups were created, designated CTP-B, CTP-E, RTP-B, and RTP-E. All groups received the same theoretical training, followed by 3 practical training sessions.

      Results

      A total of 120 students were included (30 per group). In all 4 groups, the frequency and number of total errors and critical errors decreased significantly over the course of the training sessions (P < .01). The RTP was associated with a greater reduction in the number of total errors and critical errors (P < .0001). During the third training session, we noted an error frequency of 7%-43%, a critical error frequency of 3%-40%, 0.3-1.5 total errors, and 0.1-0.8 critical errors per student. The B-PPE groups had the fewest errors and critical errors (P < .0001).

      Conclusion

      Our results indicate that both training methods improved the student's proficiency, that B-PPE appears to be easier to use than E-PPE, that the RTP achieved better proficiency for both PPE types, and that a number of students are still potentially at risk for EVD contamination despite the improvements observed during the training.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Casillas A.M.
        • Nyamathi A.M.
        • Sosa A.
        • Wilder C.L.
        • Sands H.
        A current review of Ebola virus: pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and diagnostic assessment.
        Biol Res Nurs. 2003; 4: 268-275
        View in Article
        • Kilmarx P.H.
        • Clarke K.R.
        • Dietz P.M.
        • Hamel M.J.
        • Husain F.
        • McFadden J.D.
        • et al.
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Ebola virus disease in health care workers—Sierra Leone, 2014.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014; 63: 1168-1171
        View in Article

      3. World Health Organization. Interim infection prevention and control guidance for care of patients with suspected or confirmed filovirus haemorrhagic fever in health care settings, with focus on Ebola, December 2014. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/130596/1/WHO_HIS_SDS_2014.4_eng.pdf. Accessed March 25, 2015.

        View in Article
        • Boiano J.M.
        • Steege A.L.
        • Sweeney M.H.
        Adherence to safe handling guidelines by health care workers who administer antineoplastic drugs.
        J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014; 11: 728-740
        View in Article
        • He G.X.
        • van denHof S.
        • van der Werf M.J.
        • Wang G.J.
        • Ma S.W.
        • Zhao D.Y.
        • et al.
        Infection control and the burden of tuberculosis infection and disease in health care workers in China: a cross-sectional study.
        BMC Infect Dis. 2010; 10: 313
        View in Article
        • Mitchell R.
        • Roth V.
        • Gravel D.
        • Astrakianakis G.
        • Bryce E.
        • Forgie S.
        • et al.
        • Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program
        Are health care workers protected? An observational study of selection and removal of personal protective equipment in Canadian acute care hospitals.
        Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41: 240-244
        View in Article
        • Beam E.L.
        • Gibbs S.G.
        • Boulter K.C.
        • Beckerdite M.E.
        • Smith P.W.
        A method for evaluating health care workers' personal protective equipment technique.
        Am J Infect Control. 2011; 39: 415-420
        View in Article
        • Williams C.K.
        • Carnahan H.
        Development and validation of tools for assessing use of personal protective equipment in health care.
        Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41: 28-32
        View in Article
        • MacIntyre C.R.
        • Chughtai A.A.
        • Seale H.
        • Richards G.A.
        • Davidson P.M.
        Uncertainty, risk analysis and change for Ebola personal protective equipment guidelines.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2015; 52: 899-903
        View in Article
        • Edmond M.B.
        • Diekema D.J.
        • Perencevich E.N.
        Ebola virus disease and the need for new personal protective equipment.
        JAMA. 2014; 312: 2495-2496
        View in Article
        • Fischer 2nd, W.A.
        • Hynes N.A.
        • Perl T.M.
        Protecting health care workers from Ebola: personal protective equipment is critical but is not enough.
        Ann Intern Med. 2014; 161: 753-754
        View in Article
        • Hon C.Y.
        • Gamage B.
        • Bryce E.A.
        • LoChang J.
        • Yassi A.
        • Maultsaid D.
        • et al.
        Personal protective equipment in health care: can online infection control courses transfer knowledge and improve proper selection and use?.
        Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36: e33-e37
        View in Article
        • Hung P.P.
        • Choi K.S.
        • Chiang V.C.
        Using interactive computer simulation for teaching the proper use of personal protective equipment.
        Comput Inform Nurs. 2015; 33: 49-57
        View in Article

      14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infection prevention and control recommendations for hospitalized patients under investigation (PUIs) for Ebola Virus disease (EVD) in US hospitals. January 2015. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/hospitals/infection-control.html. Accessed March 25, 2015.

        View in Article

      15. Public Health Agency of Canada. Infection Prevention and Control Expert Working Group: advice on infection prevention and control measures for Ebola virus disease in healthcare settings. 2014. Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/id-mi/vhf-fvh/ebola-ipc-pci-eng.php. Accessed March 25, 2015.

        View in Article

      16. National Institutes of Health. Ebola virus disease: information for US healthcare workers. 2014. Available from: http://www.nih.gov/health/ebola.htm#/121343. Accessed March 25, 2015.

        View in Article

      17. Instruction relative aux actions à conduire au sein de chaque établissement de santé (hors établissement de santé de référence habilité) dans le cadre de la préparation à l'accueil inopiné d'un patient cas suspect de maladie à virus Ebola. DGOS/DIR/PF2/DGS/DUS/BOP/2014/306 du 7 novembre 2014. Available from: http://circulaire.legifrance.gouv.fr/pdf/2014/11/DGOS/DIR/PF2/DGS/DUS/BOP/2014/306du7novembre2014_38918.pdf. Accessed March 25, 2015.

        View in Article

      18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. For general healthcare settings in West Africa: personal protective equipment (PPE) recommended for low-resource settings. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/hcp/international/recommended-ppe.html. Accessed April 2, 2015.

        View in Article

      19. Recommandations à l'attention des professionnels de santé exerçant en ambulatoire pour l'abord d'un patient cas suspect de maladie à virus Ebola. Available from: http://www.sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Ebola_Fiche_professionnels_sante_ambulatoire_oct_2014-1.pdf. Accessed April 2, 2015.

        View in Article
        • Chiodini J.
        Ebola and travel, personal protective equipment (PPE): useful web links and video clips.
        Travel Med Infect Dis. 2014; 12: 690-692
        View in Article

      21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidance on personal protective equipment to be used by healthcare workers during management of patients with Ebola virus disease in US hospitals, including procedures for putting on (donning) and removing (doffing), October 2014. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/ppe/guidance.html. Accessed March 25, 2015.

        View in Article
        • Roberts C.
        • McNamee R.
        Assessing the reliability of ordered categorical scales using kappa-type statistics.
        Stat Methods Med Res. 2005; 14: 493-514
        View in Article
        • Harris J.E.
        • Sheean P.M.
        • Gleason P.M.
        • Bruemmer B.
        • Boushey C.J.
        Publishing nutrition research: a review of multivariate techniques, part 2: analysis of variance.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012; 112: 90-98
        View in Article
        • Northington W.E.
        • Mahoney G.M.
        • Hahn M.E.
        • Suyama J.
        • Hostler D.
        Training retention of level C personal protective equipment use by emergency medical services personnel.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14: 846-849
        View in Article

      Article info

      Publication history

      Published online: August 12, 2015

      Footnotes

      Conflicts of interest: None to report.

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.07.007

      Copyright

      © 2015 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect
      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties. The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      RELX