Advertisement

Clostridium difficile infection epidemiology and management: Comparison of results of a prospective study with a retrospective one in a reference teaching and research hospital in Northern Italy

      Highlights

      • Time spent on training may reflect attitude to follow adopted protocols.
      • Training is the most important factor to support new practices.
      • It takes some time before hospital staff could apply protocols in a correct way.
      • Length of hospitalization is a risk factor for development of Clostridium difficile–associated disease.

      Background

      Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD) is the most common infectious antibiotic-associated diarrhea and is a growing health care problem. Prevention of Clostridium difficile infection focuses on clinical and epidemiologic infection control measures.

      Methods

      Between 2008 and 2009, we conducted a retrospective study that showed an incidence of CDAD among the highest reported in the literature. Subsequently, we developed a preventive protocol that was adopted in our hospital in 2010. We then conducted a prospective study to investigate prevalence, incidence, and mortality of CDAD and to compare the results with those of the retrospective study, evaluating adherence to preventive measures and their efficacy.

      Results

      In both studies, prevalence and incidence significantly increased in older patients. Crude prevalence was similar in the 2 studies. The incidence rate increased by 36%, with a significant increase only in the C and D wards. In-hospital mortality rose in both prevalent and incident cases. Regarding adhesion to hospital protocol, 77% of prevalent cases were treated with the required procedure. The highest percentage of isolated patients was achieved in C and D wards. In these wards we detected lower training hours per nurse. However, in 2013, we observed a significant decrease in incidence of CDAD and found a hospital prevalence of 0.33%.

      Conclusions

      Health care personnel education could be more important than the possibility of isolating infected patients in single rooms.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Burnham C.A.D.
        • Carroll K.C.
        Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.
        Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013; 26: 604
        • Gerding D.N.
        Global epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in 2010.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010; 31: S32-4
        • Huber C.H.
        • Foster N.F.
        • Riley T.V.
        • Paterson D.L.
        Clostridium difficile typing methods: challenges for standardization.
        J Clin Microbiol. 2013; 51: 2810-2814
        • Gerding D.N.
        • Muto C.A.
        • Owens Jr, R.C.
        Measures to control and prevent Clostridium difficile infection.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 46: S43-9
        • Dubberke E.R.
        • Carling P.
        • Carrico R.
        • Donskey C.J.
        • Loo V.G.
        • McDonald L.C.
        • et al.
        Strategy to prevent Clostridiun difficile infections in acute care hospital: 2014 update.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014; 35: 628-645
        • Cohen S.H.
        • Gerding D.N.
        • Johnson S.
        • Kelly C.P.
        • Loo V.G.
        • McDonald L.C.
        • et al.
        Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA).
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010; 31: 431-455
        • Butler M.
        • Bliss D.
        • Drekonja D.
        • Filice G.
        • Rector T.
        • MacDonald R.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of early diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection.
        Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville (MD)2011
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
        Vital signs: preventing Clostridium difficile infections.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012; 61: 157-162
        • Mellace L.
        • Consonni D.
        • Jacchetti G.
        • Del Medico M.
        • Colombo R.
        • Velati M.
        • et al.
        Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in internal medicine wards in northern Italy.
        Intern Emerg Med. 2013; 8: 717-723
        • Castaldi S.
        • Tiso B.
        • Laquintana D.
        Fondazione IRCCS Ca‘ Granda OMP.
        (documento del sistema qualità) P.15.F; Milan, Italy2010
        • Health Protection Agency
        Clostridium difficile infection: how to deal with the problem.
        (Available from:) (Accessed June 10, 2016)
        • Bertizzolo L.
        • Domeniconi G.
        • Fabio G.
        • Jacchetti G.
        • Serafino S.
        • Formica S.
        • et al.
        Analysis of different incidence levels of nosocomial acquired Clostridium difficile infection in an Italian research and teaching hospital.
        Ann Ig. 2013; 25: 119-124
        • Regione Lombardia
        Deliberazione n.XI/000937.
        (Determinazioni in ordine alla gestione del Servizio Socio Sanitario Regionale per l'esercizio)2011
        • Leonard M.
        • Graham S.
        • Bonacum D.
        The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13: 85-90