Advertisement

Effectiveness of cleaning-disinfection wipes and sprays against multidrug-resistant outbreak strains

      Highlights

      • All tested cleaning-disinfection wipes and sprays had >5 log10 colony forming unit (CFU) reduction.
      • No correlation was found between CFU and relative light units measurements.
      • Future research should use the now available testing standards.

      Background

      Hospital rooms play an important role in the transmission of several health care–associated pathogens. During the last few years, a number of innovative cleaning-disinfecting products have been brought to market. In this study, commercially available products combining cleaning and disinfection were compared, using 2 different application methods. The aim was to determine which product was most effective in simultaneous cleaning and disinfection of surfaces.

      Methods

      Seven cleaning-disinfecting wipes and sprays based on different active ingredients were tested for their efficacy in removal of microbial burden and proteins. Efficacy was tested with known Dutch outbreak strains: vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), Klebsiella pneumoniae OXA-48, or Acinetobacter baumannii.

      Results

      For all bacteria, ready-to-use cleaning-disinfecting products reduced the microbial count with a log10 reduction >5 with a 5-minute exposure time, with the exception of a spray based on hydrogen peroxide. Omitting the aforementioned hydrogen peroxide spray, there were no significant differences between use of a wipe or spray in bacterial load reduction. Using adenosine triphosphate (ATP) measurements, a significant difference in log10 relative light units (RLU) reduction between various bacteria (P ≤ .001) was observed.

      Conclusions

      In general, a >5 log10 reduction of colony forming units (CFU) for tested wipes and sprays was obtained for all tested bacteria strains, with exception of hydrogen peroxide spray and VRE. Although ATP may show a difference between pre- and postcleaning, RLU reduction does not correlate with actual CFU reductions.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Walsh T.R.
        • Toleman M.A.
        The emergence of pan-resistant Gram-negative pathogens merits a rapid global political response.
        J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012; 67: 1-3
        • Weber D.J.
        • Rutala W.A.
        The role of the environment in transmission of Clostridium difficile infection in healthcare facilities.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011; 32: 207-209
        • Dancer S.J.
        Hospital cleaning in the 21st century.
        Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011; 30: 1473-1481
        • Carling P.C.
        • Parry M.F.
        • Bruno-Murtha L.A.
        • Dick B.
        Improving environmental hygiene in 27 intensive care units to decrease multidrug-resistant bacterial transmission.
        Crit Care Med. 2010; 38: 1054-1059
        • Carling P.C.
        • Parry M.M.
        • Rupp M.E.
        • Po J.L.
        • Dick B.
        • Von Beheren S.
        • et al.
        Improving cleaning of the environment surrounding patients in 36 acute care hospitals.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008; 29: 1035-1041
        • Carling P.C.
        • Briggs J.L.
        • Perkins J.
        • Highlander D.
        Improved cleaning of patient rooms using a new targeting method.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 42: 385-388
        • Anderson D.J.
        • Chen L.F.
        • Weber D.J.
        • Moehring R.W.
        • Lewis S.S.
        • Triplett P.F.
        • et al.
        Enhanced terminal room disinfection and acquisition and infection caused by multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile (the Benefits of Enhanced Terminal Room Disinfection study): a cluster-randomised, multicentre, crossover study.
        Lancet. 2017; 389: 805-814
        • Passaretti C.L.
        • Otter J.A.
        • Reich N.G.
        • Myers J.
        • Shepard J.
        • Ross T.
        • et al.
        An evaluation of environmental decontamination with hydrogen peroxide vapor for reducing the risk of patient acquisition of multidrug-resistant organisms.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2013; 56: 27-35
        • Diab-Elschahawi M.
        • Assadian O.
        • Blacky A.
        • Stadler M.
        • Pernicka E.
        • Berger J.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the decontamination efficacy of new and reprocessed microfiber cleaning cloth compared with other commonly used cleaning cloths in the hospital.
        Am J Infect Control. 2010; 38: 289-292
        • Kampf G.
        • Degenhardt S.
        • Lackner S.
        • Jesse K.
        • von Baum H.
        • Ostermeyer C.
        Poorly processed reusable surface disinfection tissue dispensers may be a source of infection.
        BMC Infect Dis. 2014; 14: 37
        • Wiemken T.L.
        • Curran D.R.
        • Pacholski E.B.
        • Kelley R.R.
        • Abdelfattah R.R.
        • Carrico R.M.
        • et al.
        The value of ready-to-use disinfectant wipes: compliance, employee time, and costs.
        Am J Infect Control. 2014; 42: 329-330
        • Alfa M.J.
        • Lo E.
        • Olson N.
        • MacRae M.
        • Buelow-Smith L.
        Use of a daily disinfectant cleaner instead of a daily cleaner reduced hospital-acquired infection rates.
        Am J Infect Control. 2015; 43: 141-146
        • Podschun R.
        • Ullmann U.
        Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors.
        Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998; 11: 589-603
        • Barreto S.
        • Zambrano M.
        • Araque M.
        [Phenotypic variations of susceptibility in Klebsiella pneumoniae strains of nosocomial origin and their association with biofilm formation] [Spanish].
        Invest Clin. 2009; 50: 221-229
        • Schroll C.
        • Barken K.B.
        • Krogfelt K.A.
        • Struve C.
        Role of type 1 and type 3 fimbriae in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm formation.
        BMC Microbiol. 2010; 10: 179
        • Boyce J.M.
        • Havill N.L.
        • Havill H.L.
        • Mangione E.
        • Dumigan D.G.
        • Moore B.A.
        Comparison of fluorescent marker systems with 2 quantitative methods of assessing terminal cleaning practices.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011; 32: 1187-1193
        • Mulvey D.
        • Redding P.
        • Robertson C.
        • Woodall C.
        • Kingsmore P.
        • Bedwell D.
        • et al.
        Finding a benchmark for monitoring hospital cleanliness.
        J Hosp Infect. 2011; 77: 25-30
        • Boyce J.M.
        Modern technologies for improving cleaning and disinfection of environmental surfaces in hospitals.
        Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016; 5: 10
        • Malik R.E.
        • Cooper R.A.
        • Griffith C.J.
        Use of audit tools to evaluate the efficacy of cleaning systems in hospitals.
        Am J Infect Control. 2003; 31: 181-187
        • Whiteley R.
        • Jacobsen P.
        • Prior S.
        • Skazalski C.
        • Otten R.
        • Johnson A.
        Correlation of isokinetic and novel hand-held dynamometry measures of knee flexion and extension strength testing.
        J Sci Med Sport. 2012; 15: 444-450
        • Sattar S.A.
        • Bradley C.
        • Kibbee R.
        • Wesgate R.
        • Wilkinson M.A.
        • Sharpe T.
        • et al.
        Disinfectant wipes are appropriate to control microbial bioburden from surfaces: use of a new ASTM standard test protocol to demonstrate efficacy.
        J Hosp Infect. 2015; 91: 319-325