Major Article| Volume 47, ISSUE 2, P118-122, February 2019

Download started.


Perceived impact of state-mandated reporting on infection prevention and control departments

Published:October 12, 2018DOI:


      Currently, most US states have adopted legislation requiring hospitals to submit health care–associated infection (HAI) data. We evaluated the perceived impact of state HAI laws on infection prevention and control (IPC) departments.


      A web-based survey of a national sample of all non-veteran hospitals enrolled in the National Healthcare Safety Network was conducted in fall 2011. Variations in IPC department resources and characteristics in states with and without laws were compared by use of χ², Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon), and Student t tests. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify increases or decreases, versus no change, in perceived resources, time, influence, and visibility of the IPC department in states with and without HAI laws.


      Overall, 1,036 IPC departments provided complete data (30% response rate); 755 (73%) were located in states with laws. Respondents in states with reporting laws were more likely to report less time for routine IPC activities (odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.31) and less visibility of the IPC department (odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.58) than respondents in states without laws, after controlling for geographic region, setting, and the presence of a hospital epidemiologist.


      Respondents in states with laws reported negative effects on their IPC department, beyond what was required by federal mandates. Further research should examine resources necessary to comply with state HAI laws and evaluate unintended consequences of state HAI laws.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Magill SS
        • Edwards JR
        • Bamberg W
        • Beldavs ZG
        • Dumyati G
        • Kainer MA
        • et al.
        Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care–associated infections.
        JAMA. 2014; 370: 1198-1208
        • Herzig CT
        • Reagan J
        • Pogorzelska-Maziarz M
        • Srinath D
        • Stone PW
        State-mandated reporting of health care-associated infections in the United States: trends over time.
        Am J Med Qual. 2015; 30: 417-424
        • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
        (Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program. Available from:) (Accessed May 16, 2018)
        • Reagan J
        • Hacker C
        Laws pertaining to healthcare-associated infections: a review of 3 legal requirements.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012; 33: 75-80
        • Campanella P
        • Vukovic V
        • Parente P
        • Sulejmani A
        • Ricciardi W
        • Specchia ML.
        The impact of public reporting on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16: 296
        • Pakyz AL
        • Edmond MB
        Influence of state laws mandating reporting of healthcare-associated infections: the case of central line-associated bloodstream infections.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013; 34: 780-784
        • Zachariah P
        • Reagan J
        • Furuya EY
        • Dick A
        • Liu H
        • Herzig CT
        • et al.
        The association of state legal mandates for data submission of central line-associated bloodstream infections in neonatal intensive care units with process and outcomes measures.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014; 35: 1133-1139
        • Black BS
        • Kim HK
        The effect of mandated quality reporting on outcomes and on reporting: evidence from infection reporting in Pennsylvania.
        Northwestern Law and Econ research paper. 2018; (no. 11–19. Available from:) (Accessed May 16, 2018)
        • Liu H
        • Herzig CTA
        • Dick AW
        • Furuya EY
        • Larson E
        • Reagan J
        • et al.
        Impact of state reporting laws in central-line associated bloodstream infection rates in U.S. adult intensive care units.
        Health Serv Res. 2017; 52: 1079-1098
        • Stone PW
        • Pogorzelska M
        • Graham D
        • Jia H
        • Uchida M
        • Larson EL
        California hospitals response to state and federal policies related to health care-associated infections.
        Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2011; 12: 73-81
        • Pegues DA.
        Translating and scaling the HHS Action Plan to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections to the local level: experience of a Los Angeles Health System.
        Med Care. 2014; 52: S60-S65
        • Stricof RL
        • Van Antwerpen C
        • Smith PF
        • Birkhead GS
        Lessons learned while implementing mandatory health care-associated infection reporting in New York State.
        J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013; 19: 294-299
        • Vostok J
        • Lapsley W
        • McElroy N
        • Onofrey S
        • McHale E
        • Johnson N
        • et al.
        Assessment of the burden of mandatory reporting of health care-associated infection using the National Healthcare Safety Network in Massachusetts.
        Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41: 466-468
        • McKibben L
        • Horan TC
        • Tokars JI
        • Fowler G
        • Cardo DM
        • Pearson ML
        • et al.
        Guidance on public reporting of health care-associated infections: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005; 26: 580-587
        • Uchida M
        • Stone PW
        • Conway LJ
        • Pogorzelska M
        • Larson EL
        • Raveis VH
        Exploring infection prevention: policy implications from a qualitative study.
        Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2011; 12: 82-89
      1. Szymczak JE. How mandatory public reporting undermined IP: an ethnographic study of HAI surveillance and public reporting [abstract 906]. Program and abstracts of the 2014 Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (ID Week); 2014 Oct 8-12; Philadelphia, PA.

        • Stone PW
        • Pogorzelska-Maziarz M
        • Herzig CT
        State of infection prevention in US hospitals enrolled in the National Health and Safety Network.
        Am J Infect Control. 2014; 42: 94-99
        • Stricof RL
        • Schabses KA
        • Tserenpuntsag B
        Infection control resources in New York State hospitals, 2007.
        Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36: 702-705
        • Conway LJ
        • Raveis VH
        • Pogorzelska-Maziarz M
        Tensions inherent in the evolving role of the infection preventionist.
        Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41: 959-964
        • Stone PW
        • Pogorzelska-Maziarz N
        • Reagan J
        • Merrill JA
        • Sperber B
        • Cairns C
        • et al.
        Impact of laws aimed at healthcare-associated infection reduction: a qualitative study.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 24: 637-644
        • Linkin DR
        • Fishman NO
        • Shea JA
        • Yang W
        • Cary MS
        • Lautenbach E
        Public reporting of hospital-acquired infections is not associated with improved processes or outcomes.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013; 34: 844-846