Clinician perspectives of policy implementation: A qualitative study of the implementation of a national infection prevention policy in Australian hospitals

Published:November 29, 2018DOI:



      Clinicians play an essential role in the implementation of infection prevention policy. Despite this, little is known about how infection control policy is implemented at an organizational level or what factors influence this process. In this study, we explore these factors and the policy implementation process in the context of the introduction of a national large-scale, government-directed infection prevention policy in Australia.


      Focus groups with infection control professionals were held in 3 states to investigate the perspectives of infection control professionals involved in the implementation of aseptic technique policy requirements in Australian hospitals. Data were analyzed using an interpretive description approach, with themes mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.


      Common contextual factors were identified across all levels of the healthcare system that influenced implementation of the infection control policy, including external factors associated with the policy itself and the regulatory nature of government-directed policy.


      This study suggests that there may be particular constructs and contextual factors that are specific to policy implementation in the hospital setting. A better understanding of these factors and their influence on policy implementation would present an opportunity for improved implementation planning, resource allocation, and more effective policy development.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC)
        National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards.
        ACSQHC, Sydney (Australia)2011
        • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC)
        Safety and quality improvement guide Standard 3: Preventing and controlling healthcare associated infection.
        ACSQHC, Sydney (Australia)2012
        • Hart S
        Using an aseptic technique to reduce the risk of infection.
        Nurs Stand. 2007; 21: 43-48
        • National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
        Australian guidelines for the prevention and control of infection in healthcare.
        Commonwealthof Australia, Canberra (Australia)2010
        • Aziz AM
        Variations in aseptic technique and implications for infection control.
        Br J Nurs. 2009; 18: 26-31
        • Rowley S
        • Clare S
        Improving standards of aseptic practice through an ANTT trust-wide implementation process: a matter of prioritization and care.
        J Infect Prev. 2009; 10: S18-S23
        • Rowley S
        • Clare S
        • Macqueen S
        • Molyneux R
        ANTT v2: an updated practice framework for aseptic technique.
        Br J Nurs. 2010; 19: S5-11
        • De Sousa FM
        • O'Connor J
        Aseptic Non-Touch Technique (ANTT)-competency training and assessment.
        Healthc Infect. 2012; 17: 143-144
        • Fahy CJ
        • Costi DA
        • Cyna AM
        A survey of aseptic precautions and needle type for pediatric caudal block in Australia and New Zealand.
        Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013; 41: 102
        • Lewis G
        ANTT clinical competencies for nursing students.
        Aust Nurs J. 2009; 17: 39-41
        • Hall L
        • Halton K
        • Macbeth D
        • Gardner A
        • Mitchell B
        Roles, responsibilities and scope of practice: describing the ‘state of play’ for infection control professionals in Australia and New Zealand.
        Healthc Infect. 2015; 20: 29-35
        • Francis JJ
        • O'Connor D
        • Curran J
        Theories of behavior change synthesized into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the theoretical domains framework.
        Implement Sci. 2012; 7: 35
        • Cane J
        • O'Connor D
        • Michie S
        Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behavior change and implementation research.
        Implement Sci. 2012; 7: 37
        • Thorne S
        Data analysis in qualitative research.
        Evid-Based Nurs. 2000; 3: 68-70
        • Damschroder LJ
        • Aron DC
        • Keith RE
        • Kirsh SR
        • Alexander JA
        • Lowery JC
        Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.
        Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 50
        • Nilsen P
        Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.
        Implement Sci. 2015; 10: 53
        • Birken SA
        • Powell BJ
        • Presseau J
        • Kirk MA
        • Lorencatto F
        • Gould NJ
        • et al.
        Combined use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): a systematic review.
        Implement Sci. 2017; 12: 2