Advertisement

Technological innovations in infection control: A rapid review of the acceptance of behavior monitoring systems and their contribution to the improvement of hand hygiene

Published:December 05, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2018.10.012

      Highlights

      • Hand hygiene monitoring and feedback are recommended by the WHO.
      • This review focuses on technological behavior monitoring innovations in hand hygiene.
      • Technological behavior monitoring innovations can improve hand hygiene adherence.
      • The acceptance of technological behavior monitoring innovations is crucial.

      Background

      Hand hygiene is crucial for preventing nosocomial infections; however, adherence rates need further attention. Prevention of nosocomial infections through regular hand hygiene monitoring and feedback is recommended by the World Health Organization. Technology holds the potential for achieving this goal. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of technological behavior monitoring innovations on hand hygiene adherence and their acceptance by healthcare professionals.

      Methods

      A rapid review of the literature was conducted. A literature search was performed in electronic databases (Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PSYNDEX) and via citation tracking in November 2017. Records were screened for eligibility. Included studies were analyzed and synthesized in a narrative, tabular way.

      Results

      Overall, 2,426 studies were identified, and 12 were included. Findings indicated that behavior monitoring technology improves hand hygiene adherence, resulting in adherence increases between 6.40%-54.97%. The majority of systems provided real-time feedback. Factors influencing acceptance of technology by healthcare professionals include transparency and confidentiality, user attitude and environment, device function, and device usability.

      Conclusions

      Recognizing the importance of hand hygiene adherence, active communication between behavior monitoring technology and healthcare workers seems to mediate improvement in sustainable hand hygiene adherence behavior.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • World Health Organization
        Guidelines on core components of infection prevention and control programmes at the national and acute health care facility level.
        World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2017
        • Allegranzi B
        • Kilpatrick C
        • Storr J
        • Kelley E
        • Park BJ
        • Donaldson L
        Global infection prevention and control priorities 2018-22: a call for action.
        Lancet Glob Health. 2017; 5: e1178-e1180
        • McGuckin M
        • Govednik J
        A review of electronic hand hygiene monitoring: considerations for hospital management in data collection, healthcare worker supervision, and patient perception.
        J Healthc Manag. 2015; 60: 348-361
        • Brouqui P
        • Boudjema S
        • Soto Aladro A
        • Chabrière E
        • Florea O
        • Nguyen H
        • et al.
        New approaches to prevent healthcare-associated infection.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 65: 50-54
        • McGuckin M
        • Waterman R
        • Govednik J
        Hand hygiene compliance rates in the United States—a one-year multicenter collaboration using product/volume usage measurement and feedback.
        Am J Med Qual. 2009; 24: 205-213
        • Bolon MK
        Hand hygiene: an update.
        Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2016; 30: 591-607
        • Erasmus V
        • Daha TJ
        • Brug H
        • Richardus JH
        • Behrendt MD
        • Vos MC
        • et al.
        Systematic review of studies on compliance with hand hygiene guidelines in hospital care.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010; 31: 283-294
        • Gould DJ
        • Moralejo D
        • Drey N
        • Chudleigh JH
        • Taljaard M
        Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in patient care.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 9CD005186
        • Tilson HH
        Adherence or compliance? Changes in terminology.
        Ann Pharmacother. 2004; 38: 161-162
        • Sackett DL
        • Haynes RB
        Compliance with therapeutic regimens.
        Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (MD)1976
        • World Health Organization
        Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action.
        World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2003
        • Hagel S
        • Reischke J
        • Kesselmeier M
        • Winning J
        • Gastmeier P
        • Brunkhorst FM
        • et al.
        Quantifying the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance through comparing direct observation with automated hand hygiene monitoring.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015; 36: 957-962
        • Swoboda SM
        • Earsing K
        • Strauss K
        • Lane S
        • Lipsett PA
        Electronic monitoring and voice prompts improve hand hygiene and decrease nosocomial infections in an intermediate care unit.
        Crit Care Med. 2004; 32: 358-363
        • Marra AR
        • Edmond MB
        New technologies to monitor healthcare worker hand hygiene.
        Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014; 20: 29-33
        • Anderson J
        • Gosbee LL
        • Bessesen M
        • Williams L
        Using human factors engineering to improve the effectiveness of infection prevention and control.
        Crit Care Med. 2010; 38: 269-281
        • Staats BR
        • Dai H
        • Hofmann D
        • Milkman KL
        Motivating process compliance through individual electronic monitoring: an empirical examination of hand hygiene in healthcare.
        Manage Sci. 2017; 63: 1563-1585
        • Dawson CH
        • Mackrill JB
        • Cain R
        Assessing user acceptance towards automated and conventional sink use for hand decontamination using the technology acceptance model.
        Ergonomics. 2017; 60: 1621-1633
        • Davis FD
        Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.
        MIS Q. 1989; 13: 319-340
        • Grant MJ
        • Booth A
        A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.
        Health Info Libr J. 2009; 26: 91-108
        • Tricco AC
        • Antony J
        • Zarin W
        • Strifler L
        • Ghassemi M
        • Ivory J
        • et al.
        A scoping review of rapid review methods.
        BMC Med. 2015; 13: 224
        • Ganann R
        • Ciliska D
        • Thomas H
        Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews.
        Implement Sci. 2010; 5: 56
        • Kahn K
        • Kunz R
        • Kleijnen J
        • Antes G
        Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine. How to review and apply findings of healthcare research.
        2nd ed. Hodder & Stoughton, London (England)2011
        • Wildridge V
        • Bell L
        How CLIP became ECLIPSE: a mnemonic to assist in searching for health policy/management information.
        Health Info Libr J. 2002; 19: 113-115
        • Moher D
        • Liberati A
        • Tetzlaff J
        • Altman DG
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        PLoS Med. 2009; 6e1000097
      1. Critical Appraisal Skills Program. CASP (case-control, cohort study, qualitative research, quantitative research, systematic reviews) checklist. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/. Accessed November 20, 2018.

        • Al Salman JM
        • Hani S
        • de Marcellis-Warin N
        • Isa SF
        Effectiveness of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system on healthcare workers’ compliance to guidelines.
        J Infect Public Health. 2015; 8: 117-126
        • Radhakrishna K
        • Waghmare A
        • Ekstrand M
        • Raj T
        • Selvam S
        • Sreerama SM
        • et al.
        Real-time feedback for improving compliance to hand sanitization among healthcare workers in an open layout ICU using radiofrequency identification.
        J Med Syst. 2015; 39: 68
        • Jarrin Tejada C
        • Bearman G
        Hand hygiene compliance monitoring: the state of the art.
        Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2015; 17: 470
        • Srigley JA
        • Gardam M
        • Fernie G
        • Lightfoot D
        • Lebovic G
        • Muller MP
        Hand hygiene monitoring technology: a systematic review of efficacy.
        J Hosp Infect. 2015; 89: 51-60
        • Levchenko AI
        • Boscart VM
        • Fernie GR
        Automated monitoring: a potential solution for achieving sustainable improvement in hand hygiene practices.
        Comput Inform Nurs. 2014; 32: 397-403
        • Marra AR
        • Sampaio Camargo TZ
        • Magnus TP
        • Blaya RP
        • dos Santos GB
        • Guastelli LR
        • et al.
        The use of real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance.
        Am J Infect Control. 2014; 42: 608-611
        • Fisher DA
        • Seetoh T
        • Oh May-Lin H
        • Viswanathan S
        • Toh Y
        • Yin WC
        • et al.
        Automated measures of hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers using ultrasound: validation and a randomized controlled trial.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013; 34: 919-928
        • Levchenko AI
        • Boscart VM
        • Fernie GR
        The effect of automated monitoring and real-time prompting on nurses’ hand hygiene performance.
        Comput Inform Nurs. 2013; 31: 498-504
        • Ellingson K
        • Polgreen PM
        • Schneider A
        • Shinkunas L
        • Kaldjian LC
        • Wright D
        • et al.
        Healthcare personnel perceptions of hand hygiene monitoring technology.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011; 32: 1091-1096
        • Boscart VM
        • McGilton KS
        • Levchenko A
        • Hufton G
        • Holliday P
        • Fernie GR
        Acceptability of a wearable hand hygiene device with monitoring capabilities.
        J Hosp Infect. 2008; 70: 216-222
        • Aronson E
        • Wilson T
        • Akert R
        Social psychology.
        6th ed. Pearson Studium, München (Germany)2008
        • Kaltenthaler E
        • Cooper K
        • Pandor A
        • Martyn-St James M
        • Chatters R
        • Wong R
        The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16: 108
        • Khangura S
        • Konnyu K
        • Cushman R
        • Grimshaw J
        • Moher D
        Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach.
        Syst Rev. 2012; 1: 10