Advertisement

Impact of infectious exposures and outbreaks on nurse and infection preventionist workload

Published:April 10, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.02.007

      Highlights

      • Outbreak and exposure response creates a substantial workload for nurses and IPs.
      • Interprofessional perceptions of workload vary by organism and outbreak.
      • Quantifying burden may inform all stakeholders to respond more effectively.

      Background

      Staff nurse and infection preventionist (IP) workload increases in response to exposures and outbreaks. Understanding the time burden associated with responding to specific pathogens may improve resource allocation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate workload increases reported by nurses and IPs in response to common exposures and outbreaks.

      Methods

      Surveys were distributed to nurses in a New York hospital network and to IPs who attended the 2018 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology annual conference or to IPs who were members of local Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology chapters. Respondents were asked to rate their daily workload increase and to rank their most time-consuming activities in response to exposure and outbreak scenarios.

      Results

      A total of 150 nurses and 228 IPs responded. Among the nurses, >60-minute workload increases were reported for Clostridium difficile (76%), lice or scabies (46%), and influenza (45%). Among the IPs, >60-minute increases were reported for mumps or measles (66%), tuberculosis (64%), and C difficile (50%). Among the nurses, isolation precautions, patient and family education, and staffing changes were the most frequently reported time-consuming activities. Among the IPs, chart review, exposure list compiling, and preventive measures for exposures were the most frequently reported time-consuming activities.

      Conclusions

      Organisms that are easier to treat and more difficult to spread, such as scabies or lice, can contribute substantially to nursing workload. Notably, three-quarters of the nurses and one-half of the IPs reported that C difficile adds >1 hour to their daily workload.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Colindres CV
        • Bryce E
        • Coral‐Rosero P
        • Ramos‐Soto RM
        • Bonilla F
        • Yassi A.
        Effect of effort‐reward imbalance and burnout on infection control among Ecuadorian nurses.
        Int Nurs Rev. 2018; 65: 190-199
        • Lam SK
        • Kwong EW
        • Hung MS
        • Pang SM,
        • Chiang VC.
        Nurses’ preparedness for infectious disease outbreaks: a literature review and narrative synthesis of qualitative evidence.
        J Clin Nurs. 2018; 27: e1244-e1255
        • Musau J
        • Baumann A
        • Kolotylo C
        • O'shea T
        • Bialachowski A
        Infectious disease outbreaks and increased complexity of care.
        Int Nurs Rev. 2015; 62: 404-411
        • Kaba A
        • Baumann A
        • Kolotylo C
        • Akhtar-Danesh N.
        A descriptive case study of the changing nature of nurses’ work: the impact of managing infectious diseases requiring isolation.
        Am J Infect Control. 2017; 45: 200-202
        • Scheithauer S
        • Batzer B
        • Dangel M
        • Passweg J
        • Widmer A.
        Workload even affects hand hygiene in a highly trained and well-staffed setting: a prospective 365/7/24 observational study.
        J Hosp Infect. 2017; 97: 11-16
        • Zingg W
        • Holmes A
        • Dettenkofer M
        • Goetting T
        • Secci F
        • Clack L
        • et al.
        Hospital organisation, management, and structure for prevention of health-care-associated infection: a systematic review and expert consensus.
        Lancet Infect Dis. 2015; 15: 212-224
        • Yanke E
        • Moriarty H
        • Carayon P
        • Safdar N.
        A qualitative, interprofessional analysis of barriers to and facilitators of implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Clostridium difficile prevention bundle using a human factors engineering approach.
        Am J Infect Control. 2018; 46: 276-284
        • Bubb TN
        • Billings C
        • Berriel-Cass D
        • Bridges W
        • Caffery L
        • Cox J
        • et al.
        APIC professional and practice standards.
        Am J Infect Control. 2016; 44: 745-749
        • Murphy DM
        • Hanchett M
        • Olmsted RN
        • Farber MR
        • Lee TB
        • Haas HP
        • et al.
        Competency in infection prevention: a conceptual approach to guide current and future practice.
        Am J Infect Control. 2012; 40: 296-303
        • Hale R
        • Powell T
        • Drey NS
        • Gould DJ
        Working practices and success of infection prevention and control teams: a scoping study.
        J Hosp Infect. 2015; 89: 77-81
        • Landers T
        • Davis J
        • Crist K
        • Malik C.
        APIC MegaSurvey: methodology and overview.
        Am J Infect Control. 2017; 45: 584-588
        • Hessels AJ
        • Genovese-Schek V
        • Agarwal M
        • Wurmser T
        • Larson EL
        Relationship between patient safety climate and adherence to standard precautions.
        Am J Infect Control. 2016; 44: 1128-1132
        • Sadule-Rios N
        • Aguilera G.
        Nurses’ perceptions of reasons for persistent low rates in hand hygiene compliance.
        Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017; 42: 17-21
        • Guillemin I
        • Marrel A
        • Beriot‐Mathiot A
        • Doucet C
        • Kazoglou O
        • Luxemburger C
        • et al.
        How do Clostridium difficile infections affect nurses’ everyday hospital work: a qualitative study.
        Int J Nurs Pract. 2015; 21: 38-45
      1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2016 national and state healthcare-associated infections progress report. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hai/data/portal/progress-report.html. Accessed November 11, 2018.

        • Shrestha MP
        • Bime C
        • Taleban S.
        Decreasing Clostridium difficile–associated fatality rates among hospitalized patients in the United States: 2004-2014.
        Am J Med. 2018; 131: 90-96
        • Kelly AM
        • D'Agostino JF
        • Andrada LV
        • Liu J
        • Larson E.
        Delayed tuberculosis diagnosis and costs of contact investigations for hospital exposure: New York City 2010–2014.
        Am J Infect Control. 2017; 45: 483-486