Advertisement

Sterile field contamination from powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) versus contamination from surgical masks

Published:September 10, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.08.009

      Highlights

      • PAPRs are excellent respiratory protection, but not recommended near sterile fields.
      • Concerns are that unfiltered aerosols from PAPRs could contaminate sterile fields.
      • PAPRs proved as effective at protecting sterile fields as surgical masks.
      • Guidance for PAPR usage around surgeries or sterile fields should be tested further.

      Background

      Currently, powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) are not recommended for usage in close proximity to sterile fields owing to concerns that exhaled, unfiltered air potentially may cause contamination; however, this has not been confirmed by experimental study.

      Methods

      After establishing background levels of airborne contamination, our team placed settling plates in a sterile field and collected contamination from participants who were performing particulate-generating actions. Participants performed the actions while wearing various forms of respiratory protection, including: (1) a full facepiece PAPR, (2) a full facepiece PAPR with a shoulder-length hood, (3) a surgical mask, and (4) no facial covering (as a positive control to determine contamination-reduction effectiveness). Specimens were collected at the end of a 10-minute sampling time frame. After incubation at 36.5˚C for 72 hours, we tabulated colony forming units as a marker of contamination.

      Results

      Surgical masks and the 2 PAPR configurations all drastically reduced aerosolized droplet contamination. Surgical masks reduced contamination by 98.48%, and both PAPRs reduced contamination by 100% (compared with the usage of no facial covering). There was no statistical difference between their effectiveness (surgical mask vs both PAPRs, P value = .588 and no hood PAPR vs hood PAPR, P value >.999).

      Discussion/Conclusions

      Based on these findings, the tested PAPR configurations are effective at reducing aerosolized droplet contamination into a sterile field, and further testing is warranted to assess other PAPR configurations as well as PAPR suitability in an operating room.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2018-176. A guide to air-purifying respirators. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2018176. Accessed February 5, 2019.

      2. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational safety and health standards: personal protective equipment: respiratory protection: 1910.134(d)(3)(i)(A).https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_id=12716&p_table=STANDARDS. Accessed February 5, 2019.

      3. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA technical manual, section III: chapter 4, heat stress. Heat-related illness prevention program. Available from:https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/otm_iii/otm_iii_4.html#acclimatization. Accessed February 5, 2019.

      4. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Eye safety: infection control. Available from:https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/eye/eye-infectious.html. Accessed February 5, 2019.

      5. The National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory. Respirator trusted-source information. Section 3: ancillary respirator information. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/disp_part/respsource3healthcare.html. Accessed April 9, 2019.

      6. AORN Recommended Practices Committee. Recommended practices for surgical attire. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(06)60424-9. Accessed April 19, 2019.

      7. Lindsley WG, Green BJ, Blachere FM, Martin SB, Law BF, Jensen PA, et al. NIOSH. Sampling and characterization of bioaerosols. In: NIOSH manual of analytical methods (NMAM), 5th ed; 2017.

        • Gralton J
        • Tovey E
        • McLaws M
        • Rawlinson W
        The role of particle size in aerosolised pathogen transmission: a review.
        J Infect. 2011; 62: 1-13
      8. Technical specifications 3M Versaflo Powered Air Purifying Respirator TR-600. Available from: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1000749O/3m-versaflo-tr-600-technical-specifications.pdf. Accessed October 29, 2018.

      9. 3M Versaflo High Durability Hood with Integrated Head Suspension S-533L product informational website. Available from:https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/company-us/all-3m-products/∼/3M-Versaflo-High-Durability-Hood-with-Integrated-Head-Suspension-S-533L-Medium-Large-1-EA-Case/?N=5002385+3294753635&preselect=3293786499&rt=rud. Accessed July 16, 2019.

      10. 3M™ Versaflo™ Headcover with Integrated Head Suspension, S-133L-5 product informational website. Available from:https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/company-us/all-3m-products/∼/3M-Versaflo-Headcover-with-Integrated-Head-Suspension-S-133L-5-White-Medium-Large-5-EA-Case/?N=5002385+3294753641&preselect=3293786499&rt=rud. Accessed July 16, 2019.

      11. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational safety and health standards: personal protective equipment: respiratory protection: 1910.134 App A. Available from: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.134AppA. Accessed October 10, 2018.

      12. BioTyper User Manual, Version 2.0. Bruker Maltronik GmbH; 2007.

      13. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA technical manual, section III: chapter 2, indoor air quality investigation, sampling instrumentation and methods. Available from:https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/otm_iii/otm_iii_2.html#4. Accessed June 24, 2019.