Advertisement

Compliant or Biased? Comparing Central Line Maintenance Bundle Compliance Data Between Unit-based and Non-unit Based Observers in an Academic Hospital

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Background

      Appropriate maintenance of central lines (CL) is important to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). Daily assessment of CL maintenance with feedback was instituted as a CLABSI prevention effort. The objective of this study was to determine if observer bias influenced CL maintenance bundle observation compliance data.

      Methods

      We developed and implemented a maintenance bundle based on CLABSI prevention guidelines at a 1266-bed academic hospital. Observers were trained to audit CL for compliance with maintenance bundle components, including: alcohol-impregnated disinfection caps on unused CL ports and infusion tubing, dressings clean and dry, no oozing at insertion site greater than the size of a quarter, dressings occlusive and intact, transparent dressing change recorded within 7-day timeframe, and within 48 hours for gauze dressings. Observations were performed by unit based observers and non-unit based nurse observers house-wide. Bundle compliance between unit based observer and non-unit based observer was compared using Mantel-Haenszel chi-square analysis.

      Results

      Between 8/1/2018 and 11/1/2019 there were 91,068 CL observations [63,945 (70.2%) by unit-based and 27,123 (29.8%) by non-unit based observers]. Overall, 9,455 (10.4%) CL observations were non-compliant with 1 or more bundle components. 3,019 (3.3%) (14.11%)]. Unit-based observers were less likely to report CL observations that were non-compliant with 1 or more bundle components compared to non-unit based observers [3,808 (6%) vs. 5,647 (20.8%), p < 0.001]. Unit-based observers were less likely to document dressing non-compliance [2,163 (3.4%) vs. 3,586 (13.3%), p < 0.001] or alcohol-impregnated disinfection cap non-compliance [943 (1.6%) vs. 2,076 (8.5%), p < 0.001] compared to non-unit based observers.

      Conclusions

      Observer bias may impact reported compliance from unit-based observations, compared to trained external observer data. Unit-based observers may be less likely to report non-compliance with bundle components. The use of external observers should be considered to reduce potential bias, and increase confidence in the accuracy of compliance data.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect