Advertisement
American Journal of Infection Control
Advanced SearchSave search
Major Article| Volume 48, ISSUE 9, P1051-1055, September 01, 2020

Characteristics of COVID-19 near China's epidemic center

Published:June 26, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.191
Characteristics of COVID-19 near China's epidemic center
Previous ArticleObservations about symptomatic and asymptomatic infections of 494 patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai, China
Next ArticleContaining COVID-19 outside the isolation ward: The impact of an infection control bundle on environmental contamination and transmission in a cohorted general ward

      Highlights

      • •
        Confirmed cases of COVID-19 near the center of China's outbreak were examined.
      • •
        Confirmed cases peaked at about two weeks and then gradually decreased.
      • •
        Main sources of infection were Hubei exposure and contact with confirmed cases.
      • •
        Results suggest that measures taken to control the rate of infection were effective.
      • •
        Prevention and control efforts should be implemented as quickly as possible.

      Background

      This study described and analyzed the age, gender, infection sources, and timing characteristics of the 416 confirmed cases in two cities near the center of China's COVID-19 outbreak.

      Methods

      This study used publicly available data to examine gender, age, source of infection, date returned from Hubei, date of disease onset, date of first medical visit, date of final diagnosis, and date of recovery of COVID-19 cases.

      Results

      Public-use data revealed similar risks of infection by age and that the numbers of new and final diagnoses of confirmed cases first increased, peaked at about 2 weeks, and then gradually decreased. The main sources of infection were firsthand or secondhand exposure in Hubei Province and contact with confirmed cases, which mostly involved contact with infected household members. The mean periods from disease onset to first medical visit, first visit to final diagnosis, and final diagnosis to recovery were 4.44, 3.18, and 13.42 days, respectively.

      Conclusions

      The results suggest that the measures taken to control the rate of infection were effective. Prevention and control efforts should respond as quickly as possible, isolate and control activities of individuals leaving infected areas, and restrict household contact transmission.

      Key Words

      BACKGROUND

      The first novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) case was identified in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, on December 12, 2019, after which the disease gradually spread.
      Epidemiology Working Group for NCIP Epidemic Response
      An update on the epidemiological characteristics of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19).
      Chin J Epidemiol. 2020; 41 (In Chinese): 139-144
      The emergence of the COVID-19 epidemic coincided with the traditional Chinese Spring Festival when most migrant workers return to their hometowns to celebrate. COVID-19’s novel infection presented few obvious upper respiratory symptoms (such as nasal discharge, sneezing, or sore throat), indicating the virus mainly was infecting the lower respiratory tract,
      • Huang C
      • Wang Y
      • Li X
      • et al.
      Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.
      Lancet. 2020; 395: 497-506
      ,
      • Chan JF
      • Yuan S
      • Kok KH
      • et al.
      A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster.
      Lancet. 2020; 395: 514-523
      and most patients’ first symptom was fever. The mode of transmission might have been by droplets, close contact, aerosol, mother–infant, or fecal–mouth transfer. During the incubation period, patients could transmit the virus to other humans.
      • Holshue ML
      • DeBolt C
      • Lindquist
      First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States.
      N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 929-936
      , 

      National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. What is fecal-oral transmission?Available at:http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/nwwd/202002/f0ada96415be451a8863fbebde104a62.shtml. Accessed February 8, 2020.

      , 

      National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. National Health Commission Press Conference. Available at:http://tv.cctv.com/2020/02/02/VIDEvAxlTasVtR06YT9dJm52200202.shtml. Accessed February 2, 2020.

      , 

      The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China. Press Conference of the Joint Prevention and Control of the State Council. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/gwylflkjz03/index.htm. Accessed February 9, 2020.

      , 

      World Health Organization. Question and answer on coronaviruses. Available at:https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/q-a-coronaviruses. Accessed February 11, 2020.

      , 

      A 30-hour old infant in Wuhan diagnosed and mother-to-child infection suspected. Available at: http://news.cctv.com/2020/02/05/ARTIBNDLKFslreOGo0FW6Geu200205.shtml. Accessed February 11, 2020.

      , 
      • Zhu H
      • Wang L
      • Fang C
      • et al.
      Clinical analysis of 10 neonates born to mothers with 2019-nCoV pneumonia.
      Transl Pediatr. 2020; 9: 51-60
      As of February 22, 2020, 29 countries had reported confirmed cases of COVID-19, of which China reported 76,936 confirmed cases, 22,888 recovery cases, and 2,442 deaths.

      National Health Commission of the people's Republic of China. Available at:http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/yqtb/202002/07e5b22758364f2482d83537ef3975d2.shtml. Accessed February 23, 2020.

      ,

      World Health Organization. Available at:https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200222-sitrep-33-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=c9585c8f_4. Accessed February 23, 2020.

      According to the research reports, COVID-19 is highly infectious,
      Epidemiology Working Group for NCIP Epidemic Response
      The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China.
      Chin J Epidemiol. 2020; 41 (In Chinese): 145-151
      and the large-scale population migration associated with the Spring Festival exacerbated the spread of the disease to outlying areas. Xinyang City is in southern Henan Province, China, on the northern border of Hubei Province, and Fuyang City is in northwest Anhui Province, adjacent to Xinyang City. Xinyang and Fuyang are typical labor exporting cities near the epidemic's center.

      Petition Bureau of Xinyang City. Available at: http://www.xysxf.gov.cn/contents/80/9361.html. Accessed February 23, 2020.

      ,
      • GAO HC
      The investigation and research on Fuyang's off farm workers.
      J Fuyang Teach Coll. 2010; (In Chinese): 14-17
      This study investigated aspects of the COVID-19 transmission regarding Xinyang and Fuyang, described its characteristics, and evaluated the prevention and control measures.

      METHODS

      Data

      China's data on COVID-19 are gathered based on its classification as a Class B infectious disease. Class B infectious diseases are considered mandatory notifiable diseases; all new cases must immediately be reported using the National Infectious Diseases Monitoring Information System Database. To prevent rapid spread of the disease, the municipal health departments publicized information about the confirmed cases on the governments’ websites, including personal information, personnel exposure, and the disease trajectory. We downloaded the case information from the target cities’ health commission websites and transformed it into numerical data. The variables used in the analysis were: gender, age, source of infection, date returned from Hubei, date of disease onset, date of first medical visit, date of final diagnosis, and date of recovery. As of February 22, 2020, 416 cases of effective data were collected in the two cities

      Health Committee of Xinyang City. Available at: http://www.hnxywjw.gov.cn/plus/list.php?tid=13. Accessed February 23, 2020.

      ,

      Health Committee of Fuyang City. Available at: http://wjw.fy.gov.cn/content/channel/5c35be0048787ad14d009195/. Accessed February 23, 2020.

      : 270 cases in Xinyang and 146 cases in Fuyang.

      Conceptualization

      The sources of infection were: (1) firsthand or secondhand contact with Hubei (“Hubei exposure”), (2) “confirmed case contact,” (3) “non-Hubei returnee exposure,” and (4) “others.” “Hubei exposure” comprised confirmed cases of individuals who had recently left Hubei Province or had not recently left Hubei but had been in contact with asymptomatic individuals who had been in Hubei Province. “Confirmed case contact” refers to infected individuals who had not left their residential areas and they had been in close contact with individuals who were confirmed cases. “Non-Hubei returnee exposure” refers to individuals who had recently returned to Xinyang or Fuyang from non-Hubei provinces. In this study, a “returnee” was an individual who had returned to Xinyang or Fuyang from some other location, and “non-returnee” referred to an individual who had not left Xinyang or Fuyang.

      Statistical analysis

      The age, gender, trajectory, and rates of infection distributions of the 416 confirmed cases in Xinyang and Fuyang were analyzed. The distribution of confirmed cases in households was analyzed to describe the extent of COVID-19 clustered within household units. Using the data on timing of disease onset and final diagnosis, the COVID-19 development over time was investigated. Regarding the disease trajectory (confirmed cases), four temporal stages were identified: (1) arrival → disease onset, (2) disease onset → first medical visit, (3) first medical visit → final diagnosis, and (4) final diagnosis → recovery. The mean periods of each stage were described and analyzed. IBM SPSS 22.0 was used for data analysis.

      RESULTS

      Epidemiological situation

      As of February 22, 2020, 429 cases had been confirmed in Xinyang and Fuyang. In Xinyang, 184 of the 274 cases were in recovery (67.15%), and two had died (0.73% fatality rate); in Fuyang, 99 of the 155 cases were in recovery (63.87%), and no deaths were reported. Thus, on that date, there were 88 and 56 ongoing cases in Xinyang and Fuyang, respectively. However, 13 cases were not included due to incomplete information.

      Gender and age distributions

      Among the confirmed cases with complete effective data (N = 416), 236 were male (56.73%) and 180 were female (43.27%). The proportional age distribution was 0-18 years old (5.05%), 19-59 years old (78.84%), and 60 years or older (16.11%). The proportion of confirmed cases aged 19-59 years in the returnee group was higher than among the nonreturnees, and the proportions of confirmed cases aged 0-18 and aged 60 or older among the nonreturnees were higher than among the returnees. Table 1 presents the distributions regarding age, gender, source of infection, and within-household transmission and Figure 1 illustrates the disease trajectory between onset and final diagnosis from January 11, 2020, through February 22, 2020, and the disease trajectory from January 23, 2020, through February 22, 2020, by source of infection.
      Table 1Distribution of confirmed cases by age, gender, source of infection, and extent of household infection (N = 416)
      VariableAll confirmed casesReturneesNonreturnees
      NPercentagenPercentagenPercentage
      Age
       0-18215.0573.54146.42
       19-5932878.8417387.3715571.10
       60 or older6716.11189.104922.48
      Gender
       Male23656.7312362.1211351.83
       Female18043.277537.8810548.17
      Source of infection
       Hubei exposure21351.20
       Confirmed case contact10825.96
       Non-Hubei returnee327.69
       Other6315.14
      Household clusters
      Number of cases per householdNumber of householdsPercentage
      23364.71
      31325.49
      423.92
      511.96
      623.92
      Total13051
      Fig 1
      Fig. 1COVID-19 confirmed cases disease trajectory: (A) date of disease onset and date of final diagnosis and (B) by source of infection.

      Time distribution

      Figure 1A illustrates that the first day of disease onset in the two cities was January 11, 2020, after which the number of confirmed cases gradually increased. The disease onset peak was January 25 through January 30 and then the number of newly confirmed cases gradually decreased. The first final diagnosis was on January 23, 2020, the numbers of final diagnoses gradually increased, they peaked January 31 through February 5, and they gradually decreased from that date. The peak of the final diagnoses was about 6 days after the peak of disease onset.

      Infection sources and extent of household infection

      Hubei exposure was the source of 213 (51.20%) confirmed cases, 108 (25.96%) cases were confirmed case contacts, non-Hubei returnee exposure accounted for 32 (7.69%) cases, and there were 63 (15.14%) cases due to other sources. Figure 1B shows that the main source of infection before February 7 was Hubei exposure, and, after February 7, the main source of infection was confirmed case contact.
      Regarding within-household infection, 51 households (with 130 confirmed cases) experienced within-household transmission based on multiple infected household members (Table 1). Of them, 33 households had two, 13 households had three, two households had four, one household had five, and two households had six infected household members (64.71%, 25.49%, 3.92%, 1.96%, and 3.92% of the households with more than one infected household member, respectively). The mean number of people infected in the households with more than one infected member was 2.55.

      The period between the date of return and the date of recovery

      Table 2 shows that the mean period between the date of return to Xinyang or Fuyang and date of disease onset was 6.69 days (among the 198 confirmed cases categorized as “returnees”). The mean period between date of disease onset and date of first visit for all cases was 4.44 days, between date of first visit and date of final diagnosis was 3.18 days, and between date of final diagnosis and date of recovery was 13.42 days. The mean number of days between date of disease onset and date of first visit was slightly longer for the 218 nonreturnees than the 198 returnees. The period between date of first visit and date of final diagnosis was slightly longer for nonreturnees than returnees, and the period between date of final diagnosis and date of recovery was slightly longer for returnees than nonreturnees.
      Table 2Distributions of numbers of days from date of return to the study area to date of recovery among returnees and nonreturnees
      VariableAll confirmed casesReturneesNonreturnees
      MeanMaxMinMeanMaxMinMeanMaxMin
      Date of return–date of onset6.6933−7
      Numbers less than zero mean that some confirmed cases had symptoms indicating disease onset before they returned to the study area.
      Date of onset–date of first visit4.4421−3
      Numbers less than zero mean that some confirmed cases did not present symptoms at the time of first medical visit.
      		4.0413−3
      Numbers less than zero mean that some confirmed cases did not present symptoms at the time of first medical visit.
      		4.78210
      Date of first visit–date of final diagnosis3.181903.351903.02181
      Date of final diagnosis–date of recovery13.4225513.6425513.15257
      low asterisk Numbers less than zero mean that some confirmed cases had symptoms indicating disease onset before they returned to the study area.
      † Numbers less than zero mean that some confirmed cases did not present symptoms at the time of first medical visit.

      DISCUSSION

      Among the returnees, the proportion of confirmed cases aged 19-59 years was 87.37%, whereas the proportion of those aged 60 years or older and 0-18 years was just 12.64%. In comparison to the returnees, the proportion of nonreturnees aged 19-59 years was 16.28% higher and the proportion of those aged 60 or older was 13.38% lower. The returnees’ male to female sex ratio was 1.64:1, and the male to female sex ratio among nonreturnees was 1.08:1. These results might reflect the fact that migrant workers are most likely to be males aged 19-59 years, which means that there were relatively higher proportional representations of females and older people among the nonreturnees. Moreover, this finding indicates that people of all ages are susceptible to COVID-19.
      The numbers of final diagnoses of confirmed cases peaked within 14 days of onset and then gradually decreased until February 22 when just one case was diagnosed. This finding demonstrates that the spread of the virus had effectively been controlled through various measures, such as isolating exposed people, reducing public gatherings, increasing screenings for fever, and widespread public dissemination of prevention and control information.
      This study's analysis revealed that the main source of confirmed cases was Hubei exposure or confirmed case contact. During the first half of the outbreak period, Hubei exposure was the likeliest source and, during the second half of the outbreak period, confirmed case contact was the likeliest source of infection. Previous studies have found that close contact with infected individuals tended to carry a high risk of infection.

      National Health Commission, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, Ministry of Finance. Measures to improve working conditions of and care for physical and mental health of healthcare workers. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-02/11/content_5477476.htm. Accessed February 12, 2020.

      ,
      • Wang D
      • Hu B
      • Hu C
      • et al.
      Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China.
      JAMA. 2020; 323: 1061-1069
      The present study found that, of the confirmed cases whose source of infection was “confirmed case contact,” 72.22% were via household contact with one or more confirmed cases.
      Of the 130 confirmed cases clustered in households, the most frequent extent of household infection was two (64.71%) or three (25.49%) confirmed cases per household, and the mean was 2.55 confirmed cases per household. According to the statistical yearbook data of Xinyang and Fuyang, as of 2018, the average number of people in each household unit was 3.48.

      Statistics Bureau of Fuyang City. Available at: http://tjj.fy.gov.cn/content/detail/5e153c8b7f8b9ad94c8b456d.html. Accessed May 29, 2020.

      ,

      Henan Provincial People's Government. Available at:http://otada13m96jzaw-z-9rw.3pco.ourwebpicvip.com/sbgt-wztipt/attachment/hntjj/hntj/lib/tjnj/2019/indexch.htm. Accessed May 29, 2020.

      A previous study estimated that one confirmed case could infect an average of 2.2 people,
      Epidemiology Working Group for NCIP Epidemic Response
      The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China.
      Chin J Epidemiol. 2020; 41 (In Chinese): 145-151
      and the World Health Organization estimated a range of 1.4-2.5 people,
      • Wu F
      • Zhao S
      • Yu B
      • et al.
      A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China.
      Nature. 2020; 579: 265-269
      ,
      • Phelan AL
      • Katz R
      • Gostin LO
      The Novel Coronavirus Originating in Wuhan, China: Challenges for Global Health Governance.
      JAMA. 2020; 323: 709-710
      whereas the current study found the number of infected household clusters in the study area had a slightly higher risk.
      Among the confirmed cases with an infection source of “other,” a crowded public place was the main source of infection. These results imply that the prevention and control measures on public gatherings markedly slowed the COVID-19 rate of infection outside households. On January 21, 2020, Wuhan City in Hubei Province began to take measures to reduce the number of people gathered.

      Reduce large-scale gathering activities in Wuhan. Available at: https://health.huanqiu.com/article/3wib4AwLIS2. Accessed May 29, 2020.

      On March 19, 2020, the number of new cases in Wuhan was zero for the first time.

      No new cases in Wuhan for the first time. Available at:http://k.sina.com.cn/article_2490325853_946f5b5d02000kbpg.html?from=news&subch=onews. Accessed July 15, 2020.

      Studies have shown that the number of infected cases was significantly reduced by controlling the city's traffic, closing entertainment venues, and banning public gathering. Implementing these measures can limit the progression of the epidemic.
      • Tian HY
      • Liu YH
      • Li YD
      • et al.
      An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China.
      Science. 2020; 368 (Accessed May 29, 2020): 638-642
      By further controlling within-household contact with infected people and the size of public gatherings, incidence might be further decreased.
      The key to controlling infectious diseases is early detection, reporting, isolation, and treatment. We found that the mean period from date of return to the study area and date of disease onset was 6.69 days (range −7
      Numbers less than zero indicate that some confirmed cases had symptoms reflecting disease onset before they returned home.
      to 33). Twenty confirmed cases among the returnees (10.1%) had symptoms before they arrived in Xinyang or Fuyang, suggesting that one of the first steps to take should be to assertively control of workers’ abilities to return home which, in the early stage, might slow the rate of infection.
      The mean period from date of disease onset to first medical visit was about 4.44 days (range: −3
      The negative number indicates that some cases did not present symptoms at the time of first medical treatment.
      to 21). Two cases did not have symptoms at the time of first medical treatment (screening). Li et al. found that the mean interval between date of disease onset and date of first visit was 5.8 days (cases with onset before January 1, 2020) or 4.6 days (onset from January 1 through January 11).
      • Li Q
      • Guan X
      • Wu P
      • et al.
      Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia.
      N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 1199-1207
      We found a slightly shorter period, implying that public awareness of COVID-19 and medical treatment had gradually improved and people were increasingly likely to seek treatment. Moreover, the mean period between date of disease onset and date of first visit among nonreturnees was slightly longer than among returnees, indicating that quarantine and isolation measures were slightly stronger for returnees than nonreturnees. We found that the mean period between date of first visit and date of final diagnosis was 3.18 days, suggesting that the efficiency of early detection measures needed improvement. In addition, the mean period between date of final diagnosis and date of recovery was about 13.42 days (range: 5-25). The mean hospital stay was 10 days in a previous study,

      The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China. Press Conference of the Joint Prevention and Control of the State Council. Available at:http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/gwylflkjz03/index.htm. Accessed February 7, 2020.

      but it was slightly longer in our study.

      CONCLUSIONS

      Effective responses to COVID-19 for prevention and control required implementation of governmental measures, which apparently controlled the rate of infection in Xinyang and Fuyang, which are cities with significant flows of migrant workers to and from Hubei Province. The key to controlling the rate of infection via returnees is to act as quickly as possible, focus on isolating and controlling returnees’ mobility, and decreasing close within-household contact between infected and noninfected household members. If these measures were implemented as a preemptive first step, the rate of infection would further be reduced.

      ACKNOWLEDGMENT

      We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

      References

        • Epidemiology Working Group for NCIP Epidemic Response
        An update on the epidemiological characteristics of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19).
        Chin J Epidemiol. 2020; 41 (In Chinese): 139-144
        View in Article
        • Huang C
        • Wang Y
        • Li X
        • et al.
        Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.
        Lancet. 2020; 395: 497-506
        View in Article
        • Chan JF
        • Yuan S
        • Kok KH
        • et al.
        A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster.
        Lancet. 2020; 395: 514-523
        View in Article
        • Holshue ML
        • DeBolt C
        • Lindquist
        First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States.
        N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 929-936
        View in Article

      5. National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. What is fecal-oral transmission?Available at:http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/nwwd/202002/f0ada96415be451a8863fbebde104a62.shtml. Accessed February 8, 2020.

        View in Article

      6. National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. National Health Commission Press Conference. Available at:http://tv.cctv.com/2020/02/02/VIDEvAxlTasVtR06YT9dJm52200202.shtml. Accessed February 2, 2020.

        View in Article

      7. The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China. Press Conference of the Joint Prevention and Control of the State Council. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/gwylflkjz03/index.htm. Accessed February 9, 2020.

        View in Article

      8. World Health Organization. Question and answer on coronaviruses. Available at:https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/q-a-coronaviruses. Accessed February 11, 2020.

        View in Article

      9. A 30-hour old infant in Wuhan diagnosed and mother-to-child infection suspected. Available at: http://news.cctv.com/2020/02/05/ARTIBNDLKFslreOGo0FW6Geu200205.shtml. Accessed February 11, 2020.

        View in Article
        • Zhu H
        • Wang L
        • Fang C
        • et al.
        Clinical analysis of 10 neonates born to mothers with 2019-nCoV pneumonia.
        Transl Pediatr. 2020; 9: 51-60
        View in Article

      11. National Health Commission of the people's Republic of China. Available at:http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/yqtb/202002/07e5b22758364f2482d83537ef3975d2.shtml. Accessed February 23, 2020.

        View in Article

      12. World Health Organization. Available at:https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200222-sitrep-33-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=c9585c8f_4. Accessed February 23, 2020.

        View in Article
        • Epidemiology Working Group for NCIP Epidemic Response
        The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China.
        Chin J Epidemiol. 2020; 41 (In Chinese): 145-151
        View in Article

      14. Petition Bureau of Xinyang City. Available at: http://www.xysxf.gov.cn/contents/80/9361.html. Accessed February 23, 2020.

        View in Article
        • GAO HC
        The investigation and research on Fuyang's off farm workers.
        J Fuyang Teach Coll. 2010; (In Chinese): 14-17
        View in Article

      16. Health Committee of Xinyang City. Available at: http://www.hnxywjw.gov.cn/plus/list.php?tid=13. Accessed February 23, 2020.

        View in Article

      17. Health Committee of Fuyang City. Available at: http://wjw.fy.gov.cn/content/channel/5c35be0048787ad14d009195/. Accessed February 23, 2020.

        View in Article

      18. National Health Commission, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, Ministry of Finance. Measures to improve working conditions of and care for physical and mental health of healthcare workers. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-02/11/content_5477476.htm. Accessed February 12, 2020.

        View in Article
        • Wang D
        • Hu B
        • Hu C
        • et al.
        Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China.
        JAMA. 2020; 323: 1061-1069
        View in Article

      20. Statistics Bureau of Fuyang City. Available at: http://tjj.fy.gov.cn/content/detail/5e153c8b7f8b9ad94c8b456d.html. Accessed May 29, 2020.

        View in Article

      21. Henan Provincial People's Government. Available at:http://otada13m96jzaw-z-9rw.3pco.ourwebpicvip.com/sbgt-wztipt/attachment/hntjj/hntj/lib/tjnj/2019/indexch.htm. Accessed May 29, 2020.

        View in Article
        • Wu F
        • Zhao S
        • Yu B
        • et al.
        A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China.
        Nature. 2020; 579: 265-269
        View in Article
        • Phelan AL
        • Katz R
        • Gostin LO
        The Novel Coronavirus Originating in Wuhan, China: Challenges for Global Health Governance.
        JAMA. 2020; 323: 709-710
        View in Article

      24. Reduce large-scale gathering activities in Wuhan. Available at: https://health.huanqiu.com/article/3wib4AwLIS2. Accessed May 29, 2020.

        View in Article

      25. No new cases in Wuhan for the first time. Available at:http://k.sina.com.cn/article_2490325853_946f5b5d02000kbpg.html?from=news&subch=onews. Accessed July 15, 2020.

        View in Article
        • Tian HY
        • Liu YH
        • Li YD
        • et al.
        An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China.
        Science. 2020; 368 (Accessed May 29, 2020): 638-642
        View in Article
        • Li Q
        • Guan X
        • Wu P
        • et al.
        Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia.
        N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 1199-1207
        View in Article

      28. The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China. Press Conference of the Joint Prevention and Control of the State Council. Available at:http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/gwylflkjz03/index.htm. Accessed February 7, 2020.

        View in Article

      Article Info

      Publication History

      Published online: June 26, 2020

      Footnotes

      Conflicts of interest: None to report.

      FUNDING: This publication was funded by the Shanghai 3-Year Action Plan for Public Health System Construction ( SCREENING STUDY GWIV-18 ). The funder had no role in the study's design, data collection, analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript.

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.191

      Copyright

      © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect
      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the for this site.
      Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties. The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      RELX