Advertisement

Methodological and technical considerations for video-based auditing of hand hygiene compliance in clinical practice: an exploratory study

  • Katherine J. McKay
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to: Katherine McKay, MAdClinPrac(PP) (Hons), 39 Velma Grove, Ringwood East, Victoria 3135, Australia
    Affiliations
    Infection Prevention and Control, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia

    Faculty of Medicine and Health, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Patricia E. Ferguson
    Affiliations
    Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Center for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead, NSW, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ramon Z. Shaban
    Affiliations
    Faculty of Medicine and Health, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia

    Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Division of Infectious Diseases and Sexual Health, Westmead Hospital and Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead, NSW, Australia

    New South Wales Biocontainment Centre, Western Sydney Local Health District and New South Wales Health, NSW, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
Published:April 30, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.04.081

      Highlights

      • Direct observation is increasingly considered a flawed data collection method for hand hygiene auditing
      • Electronic alternatives, while recommended, are largely incompatible with the WHO “5 Moments”
      • Video-based monitoring systems (VMS) offer a possible solution but present methodological and technical challenges
      • Success of future VMS technology for hand hygiene auditing will particularly need to consider patient and health professional acceptability.

      Background

      Direct observation is the gold standard method for measuring hand hygiene compliance but its utility is increasingly being questioned. Various alternative electronic methods have been proposed, yet there is a paucity of research examining the use of these according to the World Health Organization's (WHO) ‘5 Moments for Hand Hygiene’. As a part of the process of developing a video-based monitoring system (VMS) capable of measuring hand hygiene compliance against the 5 moments criteria this paper reports methodological and technical issues that might arise from the use of a VMS for auditing in clinical practice.

      Methods

      In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 Australian content experts in hand hygiene auditing and infection prevention to explore their responses to proposed VMS auditing approaches. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic and content analysis.

      Results

      Technical and methodological considerations for the use of VMS were interrelated and included concerns surrounding privacy, footage security, fears of surveillance and the potential for medico-legal consequences. Additionally, possible detrimental impacts on healthcare worker (HCW) -patient relationships, issues of cost versus benefits, HCW and patient safety and changes to feedback were also identified.

      Conclusions

      The primary methodological and technical issues to overcome in order to implement VMS for hand hygiene auditing in clinical practice, centered upon issues of acceptability to patients and health professionals, privacy, consent and liability.

      Checklist

      COREQ

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • World Health Organisation
        WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Healthcare.
        Geneva, Switzerland, 2009 (Available at:)
        • Boyce J.M.
        • Pittet D.
        Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002; 23: S3-40
        • Grayson M.L.
        • Russo P.L.
        • Cruickshank M.
        • et al.
        Outcomes from the first 2 years of the Australian National Hand Hygiene Initiative.
        Med J Aust. 2011; 195: 615-619
        • Pittet D.
        • Hugonnet S.
        • Harbarth S.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Infection Control Programme.
        Lancet. 2000; 356: 1307-1312
        • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care
        National Hand Hygiene Initiative Manual.
        Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. 2019
        • Boyce J.M.
        Hand hygiene compliance monitoring: current perspectives from the USA.
        J Hosp Infect. 2008; 70 Suppl 1: 2-7
        • Diller T.
        • Kelly J.W.
        • Steed C.
        • et al.
        O016: Electronic hand hygiene monitoring for the WHO 5-moments method.
        Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. 2013; 2
        • Gould D.J.
        • Drey N.S.
        • Creedon S.
        Routine hand hygiene audit by direct observation: has nemesis arrived?.
        J Hosp Infect. 2011; 77 (Privacy Act, (1988)): 290-293
        • Gould D.J.
        • Creedon S.
        • Jeanes A.
        • Drey N.S.
        • Chudleigh J.
        • Moralejo D.
        Impact of observing hand hygiene in practice and research: a methodological reconsideration.
        J Hosp Infect. 2017; 95: 169-174
        • Pan S.C.
        • Tien K.L.
        • Hung I.C.
        • et al.
        Compliance of health care workers with hand hygiene practices: independent advantages of overt and covert observers.
        PLoS One. 2013; 8: e53746
        • Boyce J.M.
        Electronic monitoring in combination with direct observation as a means to significantly improve hand hygiene compliance.
        American Journal of Infection Control. 2017; 45: 528-535
        • Hagel S.
        • Reischke J.
        • Kesselmeier M.
        • et al.
        Quantifying the hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance through comparing direct observation with automated hand hygiene monitoring.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015; 36: 957-962
        • Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control
        Hand Hygiene Debate in the UK Parliment.
        2018 (Available at:)
        • Hansard
        Infection Prevention and Control.
        2018 (House of Commons Hansard. Available at:)
        • McKay K.J.
        • Shaban R.Z.
        • Ferguson P.
        Hand hygiene compliance monitoring: do video-based technologies offer opportunities for the future?.
        Infect Dis Health. 2020;
        • McLaws M.L.
        • Kwok Y.L.A
        Hand hygiene compliance rates: fact or fiction?.
        Am J Infect Control. 2018;
        • van de Mortel T.
        • Murgo M.
        An examination of covert observation and solution audit as tools to measure the success of hand hygiene interventions.
        Am J Infect Control. 2006; 34: 95-99
        • Parsons H.M.
        What happened at Hawthorne?.
        Sciene. 1974; 183: 922-932
        • Sahud A.G.
        • Bhanot N.
        • Radhakrishnan A.
        • Bajwa R.
        • Manyam H.
        • Post J.C.
        An electronic hand hygiene surveillance device: a pilot study exploring surrogate markers for hand hygiene compliance.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010; 31: 634-639
        • World Health Organisation
        Systematic literature review of automated/electronic systems for hand hygiene monitoring: Preliminary results.
        2013 (Available at:)
        • Clack L.
        • Scotoni M.
        • Wolfensberger A.
        • Sax H.
        First-person view" of pathogen transmission and hand hygiene - use of a new head-mounted video capture and coding tool.
        Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017; 6: 108
        • Diller T.
        • Kelly J.W.
        • Blackhurst D.
        • Steed C.
        • Boeker S.
        • McElveen D.C.
        Estimation of hand hygiene opportunities on an adult medical ward using 24-hour camera surveillance: validation of the HOW2 Benchmark Study.
        Am J Infect Control. 2014; 42: 602-607
        • Haac B.
        • Rock C.
        • Harris A.D.
        • Pineles L.
        • Stein D.
        • Scalea T.
        • Program, C. D. C. P. E.
        Hand hygiene compliance in the setting of trauma resuscitation.
        Injury. 2017; 48: 165-170
        • Forman J.
        • Creswell J.W.
        • Damschroder L.
        • Kowalski C.P.
        • Krein S.L.
        Qualitative research methods: key features and insights gained from use in infection prevention research.
        Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36: 764-771
        • Morse J.M.
        Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry.
        Qual Health Res. 2015; 25: 1212-1222
        • Shenton A.K.
        Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects.
        Education for Information. 2004; 22: 63-75
        • Sandelowski M.
        Qualitative analysis: what it is and how to begin.
        Res Nurs Health. 1995; 18: 371-375
        • Holloway I.
        • Wheeler S.
        Qualitative Research in Nursing and Healthcare.
        3rd ed. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford2010
        • Duncan D.F.
        Content analysis in health education research: an introduction to purposes and methods.
        Health Education. 2013; 20: 27-31
        • Elo S.
        • Kyngas H.
        The qualitative content analysis process.
        J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62: 107-115
      1. Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. Int J Qual Meth. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847. Accessed October 13, 2021

        • Peltier L.F.
        • Geertsma R.H.
        • Youmans R.L.
        Television Videotape Recording: an adjunct in teaching emergency medical care.
        Surgery. 1969; 66: 233-236
        • Palmore T.N.
        • Henderson D.K.
        Big brother is washing...Video surveillance for hand hygiene adherence, through the lenses of efficacy and privacy.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54: 8-9
        • Boyce J.M.
        • Polgreen P.M.
        • Monsalve M.
        • Macinga D.R.
        • Arbogast J.W.
        Frequency of Use of Alcohol-Based Hand Rubs by Nurses: A Systematic Review.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017; 38: 189-195
        • Armellino D.
        • Hussain E.
        • Schilling M.E.
        • et al.
        Using high-technology to enforce low-technology safety measures: the use of third-party remote video auditing and real-time feedback in healthcare.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54: 1-7
        • Xiao Y.
        • Seagull F.J.
        • Bochicchio G.V.
        • et al.
        Video-based training increases sterile-technique compliance during central venous catheter insertion.
        Crit Care Med. 2007; 35: 1302-1306
        • Rex D.K.
        • Hewett D.G.
        • Raghavendra M.
        • Chalasani N.
        The impact of videorecording on the quality of colonoscopy performance: a pilot study.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 2312-2317
        • Jacobs B.
        • Duncan J.R.
        • Street M.
        • Murray D.
        Audio and video recording system for routine documentation of fluoroscopic procedures.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010; 21: 725-729
        • Hu Y.Y.
        • Peyre S.E.
        • Arriaga A.F.
        • et al.
        Postgame analysis: using video-based coaching for continuous professional development.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2012; 214: 115-124
        • Weinger M.B.
        • Gonzales D.C.
        • Slagle J.
        • Syeed M.
        Video capture of clinical care to enhance patient safety.
        Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2004; 13: 136-144
        • Oakley E.
        • Stocker S.
        • Staubli G.
        • Young S.
        Using video recording to identify management errors in pediatric trauma resuscitation.
        Pediatrics. 2006; 117: 658-664
        • Government A.
        The Australian Privacy Principles.
        Australian Government, Australia2014 (Available at:)
        • van Dalen A.
        • Legemaate J.
        • Schlack W.S.
        • Legemate D.A.
        • Schijven M.P.
        Legal perspectives on black box recording devices in the operating environment.
        Br J Surg. 2019; 106: 1433-1441
        • Ryan J.
        Observing and normalizing: foucault, discipline, and inequality in schooling: big brother is watching you.
        The Journal of Educational Thought (JET) /Revue de la Pensée Éducative. 1991; 25: 104-119
        • Ellingson K.
        • Polgreen P.M.
        • Schneider A.
        • et al.
        Healthcare personnel perceptions of hand hygiene monitoring technology.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011; 32: 1091-1096
        • Bouk M.
        • Mutterer M.
        • Schore M.
        • Alper P.
        Use of an Electronic Hand Hygiene Compliance System to Improve Hand Hygiene, reduce MRSA, and Improve Financial Performance.
        Paper presented at the ACIPC 2015, Hobart, Australia2015
        • Hunukumbure A.D.
        • Smith S.F.
        • Das S.
        Holistic feedback approach with video and peer discussion under teacher supervision.
        BMC Med Educ. 2017; 17: 179
        • Hu Y.Y.
        • Arriaga A.F.
        • Roth E.M.
        • et al.
        Protecting patients from an unsafe system: the etiology and recovery of intraoperative deviations in care.
        Ann Surg. 2012; 256: 203-210
        • Scott M.
        • Watermeyer J.
        • Wessels T.M.
        Video-recording complex health interactions in a diverse setting: Ethical dilemmas, reflections and recommendations.
        Dev World Bioeth. 2020; 20: 16-26
        • Weinger M.B.
        • Gonzales D.C.
        • Slagle J.
        • Syeed M.
        Video capture of clinical care to enhance patient safety.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13: 136-144
        • den Boer M.C.
        • Houtlosser M.
        • van Zanten H.A.
        • Foglia E.E.
        • Engberts D.P.
        • Te Pas A.B.
        Ethical dilemmas of recording and reviewing neonatal resuscitation.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018; 103: F280-F284
        • O’Donnell C.P.
        • Kamlin C.O.
        • Davis P.G.
        • Morley C.J.
        Ethical and legal aspects of video recording neonatal resuscitation.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008; 93: F82-F84
        • Azim S.
        • Juergens C.
        • Hines J.
        • McLaws M.L.
        Introducing automated hand hygiene surveillance to an Australian hospital: mirroring the HOW2 Benchmark Study.
        Am J Infect Control. 2016; 44: 772-776
        • Boscart V.M.
        • Fernie G.R.
        • Lee J.H.
        • Jaglal S.B.
        Using psychological theory to inform methods to optimize the implementation of a hand hygiene intervention.
        Implementation Science. 2012; 7: 77
        • Steed C.
        • Kelly J.W.
        • Blackhurst D.
        • et al.
        Hospital hand hygiene opportunities: where and when (HOW2)? The HOW2 Benchmark Study.
        Am J Infect Control. 2011; 39: 19-26