Advertisement

Comparing surgeons’ skin tolerance and acceptability to alcohol-based surgical hand preparation vs traditional surgical scrub: A matched quasi-experimental study

Published:February 09, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.01.028

      Highlights

      • Surgical hand preparation may be performed using alcohol or antimicrobial soap.
      • We evaluated the surgeons’ tolerance and acceptability to each one of these methods.
      • Handrubbing and handscrubbing were equally well tolerated by surgeons.
      • Alcohol-based surgical hand preparation was preferred by most of them.

      Abstract

      Background

      We aimed to compare the tolerance and acceptability of alcohol-based surgical hand preparation versus handscrubbing with antimicrobial soap and water by surgeons.

      Methods

      Matched quasi-experimental trial in an academic quaternary care hospital in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil, from April 1 to October, 31, 2017. Participants were cardiac and orthopedics surgeons from the study facility. In the first study phase, they performed handscrubbing with either 2% chlorhexidine (CHG) or 10% iodopovidone (PVP-I) and, in the second phase, they performed handrubbing with alcohol-based handrub (ABHR). Surgeons' skin tolerance and acceptability were evaluated using WHO-validated tools. Data were analyzed using the MacNemar's test within STATA.

      Results

      A total of 33 surgeons participated to the “per protocol” population; the majority were male (94%); mean age of 35 years (SD, 8.5). On product tolerance, there was a minimal variation in redness, scaliness, fissures, and visual evaluation of the skin when handrubbing with ABHR was compared to handscrubbing with either PVP-I or CHX. Regarding acceptability, participants rated better handrubbing with ABHR than handscrubbing with PVP-I when assessing product smell (66.6% vs 0%, p=0.002), color (73.3% vs 0%, p=0.001), product texture (60% vs 0%, p=0.004), skin dryness (60% vs 0%, p=0.004), ease of application (66.6% vs 0%, p=0.002) and overall satisfaction (66.6% vs 6.7% p=0.011). Participants rated similarly handrubbing with ABHR and handscrubbing with CHX, except for product texture, where handrubbing rated better (71,4% vs. 0%, p=0.002). Handrubbing with ABHR was preferred by 73.3%.

      Conclusion

      Although handrubbing and handscrubbing were equally well tolerated by surgeons, alcohol-based surgical hand preparation fell into the personal preference for most of them. Trial registration. Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC), RBR-8ym9yj.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sparling KW
        • Ryckman FC
        • Schoettker PJ
        • et al.
        Financial impact of failing to prevent surgical site infections.
        Qual Manag Health Care. 2007; 6: 219-225
        • Anderson DJ
        • Podgorny K
        • Berríos-Torres SI
        • et al.
        Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014; 35: s66-s88
        • Magill SS
        • O'Leary E
        • Janelle SJ
        • et al.
        Changes in prevalence of health care–associated infections in U.S. Hospitals.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 379: 1732-1744
        • European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
        Point Prevalence Survey of Healthcare-Associated Infections and Antimicrobial use in European Acute Care Hospitals.
        ECDC, Stockholm2013 (Accessed February 22, 2022)
        • Carvalho RLR
        • Campos CC
        • Franco LMC
        • et al.
        Incidência e fatores de risco para infecção de sítio cirúrgico em cirurgias gerais.
        Rev. latinoam. enferm. 2017; 25: e2848
        • Centers for disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
        Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999; 20: 250-278
      1. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. Geneva, Switzerland, WHO; 2016.

      2. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. First Global Patient Safety Challenge. Clean Care is Safe Care. Geneva, Switzerland, WHO; 2009.

      3. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Brasil). Nota Técnica GVIMS/GGTES/ANVISA N°01.2018. Orientações gerais para higiene das mãos em serviços de saúde. Brasília, 2020. Disponível em. Accessed February 22, 2022. https://www20.anvisa.gov.br/segurancadopaciente/index.php/alertas/item/nota-tecnica-gvims-ggtes-anvisa-n-07-2020.

        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the healthcare infection control practices advisory committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA hand hygiene task force.
        MMWR. 2002; 51 (No. RR16)
        • Boyce JM
        • Pittet
        • Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee
        Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings. recommendations of the healthcare infection control practices advisory committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA hand hygiene task force.
        MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002; 51: 1-45
        • Boyce JM
        Using alcohol for hand antisepsis: dispelling old myths.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000; 21: 442-448
        • Loffler H
        • Kampf G
        • Schmermund D
        • Maibach HI
        How irritant is alcohol?.
        Br J Dermatol. 2007; 157: 74-81
        • Graf ME
        • Machado A
        • Mensor LL
        • Zampieri D
        • Campos R
        Surgical hands antisepsis with alcohol-based preparations: cost-effectiveness, compliance of professionals and ecological benefits in the Brazilian healthcare scenario.
        J Bras Econ Saúde. 2014; 6: 71-80
        • Gonçalves KJ
        • Graziano KU
        • Kawagoe JY
        Revisão sistemática sobre antissepsia cirúrgica das mãos com preparação alcoólica em comparação aos produtos tradicionais.
        Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP [Internet]. 2012; 46: 1484-1493
      4. CSN EN 12791. European Standards. Chemical Disinfectants and Antiseptics: Surgical Hand Disinfection. TestMmethod and Requirements (Phase2/Step2). Brussels. 2005. Accessed February 22, 2022. https://standards.globalspec.com/std/13065377/EN%2012791

      5. ASTM E 1115 –11. International Standards Worldwide. Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Surgical Hand Scrub Formulations [Internet]. West Conshohocken; 2011. Accessed February 22, 2022. http://enterprise.astm.org/filtrexx40.cgi?+REDLINE_PAGES/E1115.htm

        • Organização Pan-Americana Da Saúde (OPAS); Agência Nacional De Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA)
        Manual para observadores: estratégia multimodal da OMS para melhoria da higienização das mãos.
        OPAS e ANVISA, Brasília2008
        • Kownatzki E
        Hand hygiene and skin health.
        J Hosp Infect. 2003; 55: 239-245
        • Chamorey E
        • Marcy PY
        • Dandine M
        • et al.
        A prospective multicenter study evaluating skin tolerance to standard hand hygiene techniques.
        Am J Infect Control. 2011; 39: 6-13
        • Bryce EA
        • Spence D
        • Roberts FJ
        An in-use evaluation of an alcohol-based pre-surgical hand disinfectant.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001; 221: 635-639
        • Carro C
        • Camilleri L
        • Traore O
        • et al.
        Duale. An in-use microbiological comparison of two surgical hand disinfection techniques in cardiothoracic surgery: hand rubbing vs hand scrubbing.
        J Hosp Infect. 2007; 67: 62-66
        • Gaspar GG
        • Menegueti MG
        • Lopes AER
        • et al.
        Alcohol-based surgical hand preparation: translating scientific evidence into clinical practice.
        Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018; 7: 80
        • Asensio A
        • Gregorio L
        Practical experience in a surgical unit when changing from scrub to rub.
        J Hosp Infect. 2013; 83: S40-S42
        • Paul C
        • Maumus-Robert S
        • Mazereeuw-Hautier J
        • Guyen CN
        • Saudez X
        • Schmitt AM
        Prevalence and risk factors for xerosis in the elderly: a cross-sectional epidemiological study in primary care.
        Dermatology. 2011; 223: 260-265
        • Griggs D
        • Smith M
        • Rockström J
        • et al.
        An integrated framework for sustainable development goals.
        Ecol Soc. 2014; 19
      6. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and World Health Organization. Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000-2017. Special Focus on Inequalities. 2019. New York.