Advertisement

Implementation of an evidence-based bundle to reduce surgical site infection after caesarean section – Review of the interventions

      Highlights

      • A care bundle reduces rates of surgical site infection post caesarean section.
      • Less wound infection and return to theatre after care bundle implementation.
      • Unchanged endometritis rates after care bundle implementation.

      Abstract

      Background

      Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common complication post caesarean section (CS) with a significant impact on women and health services. A bundle approach incorporating previously studied individual interventions has shown increased reductions in SSI.

      Aim

      To assess compliance with a SSI intervention bundle and to examine readmission rates for SSI.

      Methods

      A retrospective audit of women who underwent CS at a regional hospital in Queensland, Australia pre-intervention (February 2015-January 2017) and post-intervention (February 2018-December 2020).

      Results

      There was good compliance with vaginal cleansing (27.7% vs 84.8%), chlorhexidine skin preparation (90.4% vs 98.4%), BMI-based antibiotic dose adjustment (48.8% vs 74.3%), and Alexis retractor use (9.9% vs 66%), pre and post-implementation periods respectively. There was a reduction in documented hair shaving (2.1% vs 0.5%). There was a trend towards less admission for SSI, a trend that could have been even better had there not been an increasing number of women with high BMI over the years. Fewer cases needed return to theatre post-implementation. Endometritis rates were unchanged.

      Conclusions

      Good compliance can be achieved with good collaboration. There was a reduction in admission rates for SSI. Larger prospective studies are needed to further examine these findings.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2021) Australia's mothers and babies, AIHW, Australian Government. Accessed September 1, 2022. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/population-groups/mothers-babies/overview.

        • Mahomed K
        • Ibiebele I
        • Buchanan J
        Betadine Study Group. The Betadine trial - antiseptic wound irrigation prior to skin closure at caesarean section to prevent surgical site infection: A randomised controlled trial.
        Australian New Zealand J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016; 56: 301-306
        • Webster J
        • Osborne S
        Full body versus partial (op site only) bath with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection).
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; 2: CD004985
        • Al Maqbali MAH.
        Pre-operative hair removal: a literature review.
        Int J Nurs Clin Pract. 2016; 3: 163
        • Haas DM
        • Morgan S
        • Kimball S
        • Contreras K.
        Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections.
        Meta-Analysis Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 4CD007892
        • Ngai IM
        • Van Arsdale A
        • Govindappagari S
        • et al.
        Skin preparation for prevention of surgical site infection after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: 1251-1257
        • Tuuli MG
        • Liu J
        • Stout MJ
        • et al.
        A randomized trial comparing skin antiseptic agents at cesarean delivery.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 647-655
        • Pevzner L
        • Swank M
        • Krepel C
        • Wing DA
        • Chan K
        • Jr Edmiston CE
        Effects of maternal obesity on tissue concentrations of prophylactic cefazolin during cesarean delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 877-882
        • Guo J
        • Pan LH
        • Li YX
        • et al.
        Efficacy of triclosan-coated sutures for reducing risk of surgical site infection in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
        J Surg Res. 2016; 201: 105-117
        • Tanner J
        • Padley W
        • Assadian O
        • Leaper D
        • Kiernan M
        • Edmiston C.
        Do surgical care bundles reduce the risk of surgical site infections in patients undergoing colorectal surgery? A systematic review and cohort meta-analysis of 8,515 patients.
        Surgery. 2015; 158: 66-77
        • Wassef M
        • Mukhtar A
        • Nabil A
        • Ezzelarab M
        • Ghaith D.
        Care bundle approach to reduce surgical site infections in acute surgical intensive care unit.
        Cairo, Egypt. Infect Drug Resist. 2020; 13: 229-236
        • Proops EM.
        Implementing a surgical site infection care bundle: Implications for perioperative practice.
        J Perioperat Nurs. 2019; 32 (Iss. 2, Article 4)
        • Carter EB
        • Temming LA
        • Fowler S
        • et al.
        Evidence-based bundles and cesarean delivery surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130: 735-746
      2. Nankervis A, McIntyre HD, Moses R, et al. McElduff a for the australasian diabetes in pregnancy society ADIPS consensus guidelines for the testing and diagnosis of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy in Australia and New Zealand (modified November 2014).

        • Hsu CD
        • Cohn I
        • Caban R.
        Reduction and sustainability of cesarean section surgical site infection: An evidence-based, innovative, and multidisciplinary quality improvement intervention bundle program.
        Am Infect Control. 2016; 44: 1315-1320
        • Jakes AD
        • Bell A
        • Chiwera L
        • Lloyd J.
        Implementation of vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section.
        BMJ Open Quality. 2020; 9e000976
        • Waringa GJ
        • Shawerb S
        • Hinshawc K.
        The use of O-ring retractors at Caesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Euro J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol. 2018; 228: 209-214
        • Borchardt RA
        • Tzizik D
        Update on surgical site infections: The new CDC guidelines.
        JAAPA. 2018; 31: 52-54
        • Edmiston CE
        • Krepel C
        • Spencer M
        • et al.
        Seabrook Response to ReviewersGR. Evidence for preadmission showering regimen to achieve maximal antiseptic skin surface concentrations of chlorhexidine gluconate, 4% in surgical patients.
        JAMA Surg. 2015; 150: 1027-1332
      3. WHO Surgical Site Infection prevention guidelines 2018 appendix 2 summary of a systematic review on preoperative bathing.

        • Spencer M
        • Barnden M
        • Boehm Johnson H
        • Litz Fauerbach L
        • Graham D
        • Edmiston CE.
        Perioperative hair removal: A review of best practice and a practice improvement opportunity.
        J Perioperat Pract. 2018; 28: 159-166
      4. Association of PeriOperative Registered Nurses. AORN Perioperative efficiency toolkit 2016.

        • Hadiati DR
        • Hakimi M
        • Detty S
        Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; : CD007462
      5. National Institute For Health And Clinical Excellence (2017) Surgical Site Infections: Prevention And Treatment: Clinical Guidelines [CG74].

        • Scheck SM
        • Blackmore T
        • Maharaj D
        • Langdana F
        • Elder RE.
        Caesarean section wound infection surveillance.
        Inform act. 2018; 5: 518-524
        • Tita ATN
        • Szychowski JM
        • Boggess K
        • et al.
        Adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis for cesarean delivery.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 1231-1241
        • Jabs C
        • Giroux M
        • Minion J
        • Karreman E
        • Faires M
        Evaluation of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis in women undergoing cesarean delivery in a setting with low baseline incidence of surgical site infection.
        JOCG. 2021; 43: 1062-1068
        • Hinkson L
        • Siedentopf JP
        • Weichert A
        • Henrich W.
        Surgical site infection in cesarean sections with the use of a plastic sheath wound retractor compared to the traditional self-retaining metal retractor.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 203: 232-238
        • Scolari Childress KM
        • Gavard JA
        • Ward DG
        • Berger K
        • Gross GA.
        A barrier retractor to reduce surgical site infections and wound disruptions in obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
        ACOG. 2016; 214: 285
        • Martin EK
        • Beckmann MM
        • Barnsbee LN
        • et al.
        Best practice perioperative strategies and surgical techniques for preventing caesarean section surgical site infections: a systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses.
        BJOG. 2018; 125 (956–64): 956-964
        • Anorlu RI
        • Maholwana B
        • Hofmeyr GJ.
        Methods of delivering the placenta at caesarean section.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; : CD004737
        • Gillespie BM
        • Webster J
        • Ellwood D
        • et al.
        Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressings in obese women undergoing caesarean section: multicentre parallel group randomised controlled trial.
        BMJ. 2021; 373: n893