Highlights
- •Qualitative fit test pass rates varied widely across FFR models.
- •Women had a higher likelihood of failure than men.
- •NIOSH-approved FFRs were designed based on data that underrepresented women.
- •Institutions should collect qualitative fit testing data to guide FFR selection.
Abstract
Background
We analyzed the qualitative fit test results of the filtering facepiece respirators
(FFRs) used at our institution to determine their performance and utility.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 12,582 qualitative fit testing results for several FFR
models among 8,809 health care workers (HCWs).
Results
The overall failure rate for HCWs was 15.2%. Nearly one-third (2933/8809, 33.3%) had
multiple FFRs fit tested. HCW sex was a statistically significant indicator of fit
testing failure (χ2 = 29.9, df = 1, P < .001), with women having a 44% higher likelihood (OR, 1.4; 95% CI: 1.27–1.65) than
men. There were statistically significant differences in the failure rate across FFRs
(Fig 4, F[5, 12475] = 8.4, P < .001). Fluidshield 46867S had a significantly higher failure rate (49%) than the
3M 1860 (P = .012), 3M 1860S (P < .001), 3M 8210 (P < .001), and Safelife (P < .001) FFRs.
Conclusions
There was a large degree of variation in fit testing results for the FFRs tested.
Although we were unable to find an FFR that fit more than 95% of the HCWs successfully,
we identified poorly functioning FFRs that can help our institution with decision-making
and budgeting for acquisition and stocking appropriate FFRs.
Key Words
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to American Journal of Infection ControlAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- The national personal protective technology laboratory (NPPTL).Respiratory Protection Information Trusted Source. 2021; (Available at) (Accessed December 18)
- The respirator fit capability test: enhancing the efficacy of filtering facepiece respirators.Synergist (Akron). 2019; 2019: 2019
- Respirator protection factors: part I – Development of an anthropometric test panel.Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1978; 39: 970-975
- Head-and-face anthropometric survey of U.S. respirator users.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005; 2: 567-576
- Quantitative respirator fit, face sizes, and determinants of fit in South African diagnostic laboratory respirator users.Ann Work Expo Health. 2017; 61: 1154-1162
- Comparison of qualitative and quantitative fit-testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017; 14: 175-179
- Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004; 1: 262-271
- The national personalprotective technology laboratory.Preparing solutions for qualitative fit testing from available chemicals. 2021; (Available at) (Accessed December 18)
- Trends in diversity and representativeness of health care workers in the United States, 2000 to 2019.JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4e2117086
- New respirator fit test panels representing the current U.S. civilian work force.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007; 4: 647-659
- Prospective observational study of gender and ethnicity biases in respiratory protective equipment for healthcare workers in the COVID-19 pandemic.BMJ Open. 2021; 11e047716
- Facial anthropometric differences among gender, ethnicity, and age groups.Ann Occup Hyg. 2010; 54: 391-402
- Characterization of small-to-medium head-and-face dimensions for developing respirator fit test panels and evaluating fit of filtering facepiece respirators with different faceseal design.PLoS One. 2017; 12e0188638
- Facial hair and respirator fit: a review of the literature.Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1988; 49: 199-204
- A close shave? Performance of P2/N95 respirators in healthcare workers with facial hair: results of the BEARDS (Benchmarking Adequate Respiratory DefenceS) study.J Hosp Infect. 2020; 104: 529-533
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: June 01, 2022
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
Funding/support: None.
Conflicts of interest: None to report.
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
