- •Qualitative fit test pass rates varied widely across FFR models.
- •Women had a higher likelihood of failure than men.
- •NIOSH-approved FFRs were designed based on data that underrepresented women.
- •Institutions should collect qualitative fit testing data to guide FFR selection.
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
- The national personal protective technology laboratory (NPPTL).Respiratory Protection Information Trusted Source. 2021; (Available at) (Accessed December 18)
- The respirator fit capability test: enhancing the efficacy of filtering facepiece respirators.Synergist (Akron). 2019; 2019: 2019
- Respirator protection factors: part I – Development of an anthropometric test panel.Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1978; 39: 970-975
- Head-and-face anthropometric survey of U.S. respirator users.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005; 2: 567-576
- Quantitative respirator fit, face sizes, and determinants of fit in South African diagnostic laboratory respirator users.Ann Work Expo Health. 2017; 61: 1154-1162
- Comparison of qualitative and quantitative fit-testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017; 14: 175-179
- Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004; 1: 262-271
- The national personalprotective technology laboratory.Preparing solutions for qualitative fit testing from available chemicals. 2021; (Available at) (Accessed December 18)
- Trends in diversity and representativeness of health care workers in the United States, 2000 to 2019.JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4e2117086
- New respirator fit test panels representing the current U.S. civilian work force.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007; 4: 647-659
- Prospective observational study of gender and ethnicity biases in respiratory protective equipment for healthcare workers in the COVID-19 pandemic.BMJ Open. 2021; 11e047716
- Facial anthropometric differences among gender, ethnicity, and age groups.Ann Occup Hyg. 2010; 54: 391-402
- Characterization of small-to-medium head-and-face dimensions for developing respirator fit test panels and evaluating fit of filtering facepiece respirators with different faceseal design.PLoS One. 2017; 12e0188638
- Facial hair and respirator fit: a review of the literature.Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1988; 49: 199-204
- A close shave? Performance of P2/N95 respirators in healthcare workers with facial hair: results of the BEARDS (Benchmarking Adequate Respiratory DefenceS) study.J Hosp Infect. 2020; 104: 529-533
Publication stageIn Press Journal Pre-Proof
Conflicts of interest: None to report.