Advertisement

Investigating Particulate Production in The Operating Suite Following the Use of Waterless Alcohol Based Dry Scrub Versus Traditional Hand Washing and Drying with Commonly Used Surgical Towels: An Experimental Study.

      Highlights

      • Surgical Site Infections cause substantial morbidity and cost in the United States
      • Waterless alcohol-based dry scrub yielded the lowest amount of particulate formation
      • Reusable surgical towels produced the highest number of particulates

      Abstract

      Background

      An often-overlooked item that could cause contamination in the operating suite are the towels used for hand drying following surgical scrub. The purpose of this current study was to determine if there was a difference in the particulate count from different hand drying methods following surgical hand preparation.

      Methods

      Three simulated hand drying groups were established: disposable sterilized surgical towels, reusable sterilized surgical towels, and a waterless alcohol-based dry rub. Particle size measurements of 0.3 µm, 5.0 µm, and 10.0 µm were collected at time zero and repeated every minute for 5 minutes for a total of 10 trials each.

      Results

      Both the reusable and disposable towels produced significantly more particle matter in all size groups compared to the alcohol scrub control group. A comparison analysis and ANOVA testing demonstrated that alcohol dry scrub produced significantly fewer particles compared to both the disposable blue towels (P<0.01) and the reusable green towels (P<0.01). Disposable towels produced significantly more particles in the 0.3 µm count compared to reusable towels (P<0.05).

      Conclusions

      An alcohol-based dry rub without using a towel yielded the lowest amount of particulate formation in this experimental model, while reusable surgical towels produced the highest number of particles.

      Level of Evidence

      Level II Experimental Study

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      Citations

        • Perencevich EN
        • Sands KE
        • Cosgrove SE
        • et al.
        Health and Economic Impact of Surgical Site Infections Diagnosed after Hospital Discharge.
        Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2003; 9: 196-203https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0902.020232
        • Pawłowska I
        • Ziółkowski G
        • Wójkowska-Mach J
        • et al.
        Can surgical site infections be controlled through microbiological surveillance? A three-year laboratory-based surveillance at an orthopaedic unit, retrospective observatory study.
        International orthopaedics. 2019; 43: 2009-2016
        • Gibson A
        • Tevis S
        • Kennedy G.
        Readmission after delayed diagnosis of surgical site infection: a focus on prevention using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
        The American Journal of Surgery. 2014; 207: 832-839
        • Merkow RP
        • Ju MH
        • Chung JW
        • et al.
        Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States.
        Jama. 2015; 313: 483-495
        • Jones J.
        Examining the multifactorial nature of wound infection.
        Wounds Essentials. 2012; 2: 90-97
        • Thomas C.
        Intrinsic and extrinsic sources and prevention of infection (in surgery).
        Surgery (Oxford). 2019; 37: 26-32
        • Challenge FGPS.
        WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care: a summary.
        Geneva: World Health Organization. 2009; 119: 1977-2016
        • Widmer A
        • Rotter M
        • Voss A
        • et al.
        Surgical hand preparation: state-of-the-art.
        Journal of Hospital Infection. 2010; 74: 112-122
        • Fry DE.
        Operating room hand preparation: To scrub or to rub?.
        Surgical infections. 2019; 20: 129-134
        • Cristina ML
        • Spagnolo AM
        • Sartini M
        • et al.
        Can particulate air sampling predict microbial load in operating theatres for arthroplasty?.
        PLoS One. 2012; 7: e52809
        • Scaltriti S
        • Cencetti S
        • Rovesti S
        • et al.
        Risk factors for particulate and microbial contamination of air in operating theatres.
        Journal of Hospital Infection. 2007; 66: 320-326https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2007.05.019
        • Birgand G
        • Toupet G
        • Rukly S
        • et al.
        Air contamination for predicting wound contamination in clean surgery: a large multicenter study.
        American journal of infection control. 2015; 43: 516-521
        • Pati P
        • Rathore S.
        Role of Ventilation in Controlling Surgical Site Infections.
        J Clin Med Surgery. 2022; 2: 1002
        • Andersson AE
        • Bergh I
        • Karlsson J
        • et al.
        Traffic flow in the operating room: An explorative and descriptive study on air quality during orthopedic trauma implant surgery.
        American Journal of Infection Control. 2012; 40: 750-755https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2011.09.015
        • xxx
        Effect of air exhaust location on surgical site particle distribution in an operating room. Building Simulation.
        Springer, 2020
        • Cook TM
        • Piatt CJ
        • Barnes S
        • et al.
        The Impact of Supplemental Intraoperative Air Decontamination on the Outcome of Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Pilot Analysis.
        The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 549-553https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.041
        • Stocks GW
        • Self SD
        • Thompson B
        • et al.
        Predicting bacterial populations based on airborne particulates: A study performed in nonlaminar flow operating rooms during joint arthroplasty surgery.
        American Journal of Infection Control. 2010; 38: 199-204https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2009.07.006
        • Landrin A
        • Bissery A
        • Kac G.
        Monitoring air sampling in operating theatres: can particle counting replace microbiological sampling?.
        Journal of Hospital Infection. 2005; 61: 27-29https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2005.03.002
        • Chen AF
        • Wessel CB
        • Rao N.
        Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization in orthopaedic surgery and reduction of surgical site infections.
        Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2013; 471: 2383-2399
        • Lakhundi S
        • Zhang K.
        Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: molecular characterization, evolution, and epidemiology.
        Clinical microbiology reviews. 2018; 31 (e00020-18)
        • Noguchi C
        • Koseki H
        • Horiuchi H
        • et al.
        Factors contributing to airborne particle dispersal in the operating room.
        BMC surgery. 2017; 17: 1-6
        • Markel TA
        • Gormley T
        • Greeley D
        • et al.
        Hats off: a study of different operating room headgear assessed by environmental quality indicators.
        Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2017; 225: 573-581
        • Tan H
        • Wong KY
        • Nyakuma BB
        • et al.
        Systematic study on the relationship between particulate matter and microbial counts in hospital operating rooms.
        Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021; : 1-12
        • Wan G-H
        • Chung F-F
        • Tang C-S.
        Long-term surveillance of air quality in medical center operating rooms.
        American journal of infection control. 2011; 39: 302-308
        • Dommergue A
        • Amato P
        • Tignat-Perrier R
        • et al.
        Methods to investigate the global atmospheric microbiome.
        Frontiers in microbiology. 2019; 10: 243
        • Gülşen M
        • Aydıngülü N
        • Arslan S
        • et al.
        Surgical handwashing practices of operating room staff: An observational study.
        Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2021;
      1. Safety WP, Organization WH. WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care: World Health Organization, 2009.

        • Jemal S.
        Knowledge and practices of hand washing among health professionals in Dubti Referral Hospital, Dubti, Afar, Northeast Ethiopia.
        Advances in preventive medicine. 2018; : 2018
        • Tan J
        • de Kraker M
        • Pires D
        • et al.
        Handrubbing with sprayed alcohol-based hand rub: an alternative method for effective hand hygiene.
        Journal of Hospital Infection. 2020; 104: 430-434
        • Barbadoro P
        • Martini E
        • Savini S
        • et al.
        In vivo comparative efficacy of three surgical hand preparation agents in reducing bacterial count.
        Journal of Hospital Infection. 2014; 86: 64-67
        • Widodo H
        • Sesaria TG
        • Maulana MR
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of Surgical hand Washing with Chlorhexidine, Providone iodine and Alcohol on Reducing the Microorganisms on the Hands: A Systematic Review.
        Jurnal Ners. 2019; 14: 112-116
        • Shen N-J
        • Pan S-C
        • Sheng W-H
        • et al.
        Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of alcohol-based hand rub and conventional surgical scrub in a medical center.
        Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection. 2015; 48: 322-328
        • Parlak EA
        • Iyigun E
        • Albay A
        • et al.
        Impact of methods and duration of surgical hand scrub on bacterial count: A randomized controlled trial.
        American Journal of Infection Control. 2021;
        • Bhasme AS
        • Menezes RJ
        • D'souza T
        • et al.
        Duration of surgical hand scrub in orthopaedic surgeries.
        International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences. 2017; 3: 34-36
        • Al-Naami MY
        • Anjum MN
        • Afzal MF
        • et al.
        Alcohol-based hand-rub versus traditional surgical scrub and the risk of surgical site infection: a randomized controlled equivalent trial.
        EWMA Journal. 2009; 9
        • Zhuang M
        • Chai Y.
        Orthopedic Operating Room Settings and Aseptic Techniques.
        Tutorials in Suturing Techniques for Orthopedics: Springer, 2021: 75-82
        • Asensio A
        • De Gregorio L.
        Practical experience in a surgical unit when changing from scrub to rub.
        Journal of Hospital Infection. 2013; 83: S40-S42
        • Wang C
        • Holmberg S
        • Sadrizadeh S.
        Impact of door opening on the risk of surgical site infections in an operating room with mixing ventilation.
        Indoor and Built Environment. 2021; 30: 166-179
        • Gormley T
        • Markel TA
        • Jones III HW
        • et al.
        Methodology for analyzing environmental quality indicators in a dynamic operating room environment.
        American journal of infection control. 2017; 45: 354-359