Advertisement

SEE the DIFFerence: Reducing Unnecessary C. difficile Orders Through Clinical Decision Support in a Large, Urban Safety-Net System

Published:November 09, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.11.003

      Highlights

      • 3-26% of inpatients are colonized with C. difficile, which contributes to false positive tests
      • It is not recommended to test for C. difficile if administered laxatives in the last 48 hours, or a recent positive or negative test within 7 days.
      • Utilizing best practice advisories for recent administration of laxatives, or recent positive or negative test successfully reduced C. difficile orders by 27.3%.

      Abstract

      Background

      Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is a hospital-acquired infection. Overtesting for C. difficile leads to false positive results due to a high rate of asymptomatic colonization, resulting in unnecessary and harmful treatment for patients.

      Methods

      This was a quality improvement initiative to decrease the rate of inappropriate C. difficile testing across 11 hospitals in an urban, safety-net setting. Three best practice advisories were created, alerting providers of recent laxative administration within 48 hours, a recent positive test within 14 days, and a recent negative test within 7 days. The outcome measures were the number of C. difficile tests per 1000 patient days, as well as the rate of hospital onset C. difficile infection was compared pre- and post-intervention. The process measures included the rate of removal of the C. difficile test from the best practice advisory, as well as the subsequent 24-hour re-order rate.

      Results

      The number of C. difficile tests decreased by 27.3% from 1.1 per 1000 patient days pre-intervention (May 25, 2020-May 24, 2021) to 0.8 per 1000 patient days post-intervention, (May 25, 2021 to March 25, 2022), p<0.001. When stratified by hospital, changes in testing ranged from an increase of 12.5% to a decrease of 60.0%. Analysis among provider type showed higher behavior change among attendings than compared to trainees or advanced practice providers. There was a 12.1%, non-significant decrease in C. difficile rates from pre-intervention, 0.33 per 1000 patient days compared to post-intervention, 0.29 per 1000 patient days, p=0.32.

      Conclusion

      Using only an electronic health record intervention, we successfully decreased C. difficile orders after 72 hours of admission in a large, safety-net system. Variation existed among hospitals and by provider type.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Howard-Anderson JR
        • Sexton ME
        • Robichaux C
        • et al.
        The impact of an electronic medical record nudge on reducing testing for hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020; 41: 411-417
        • White DR
        • Hamilton KW
        • Pegues DA
        • Hanish A
        • Umscheid CA.
        The Impact of a Computerized Clinical Decision Support Tool on Inappropriate Clostridium difficile Testing.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017; 38: 1204-1208
        • Zhang S
        • Palazuelos-Munoz S
        • Balsells EM
        • Nair H
        • Chit A
        • Kyaw MH.
        Cost of hospital management of Clostridium difficile infection in United States-a meta-analysis and modelling study.
        BMC Infect Dis. 2016; 16: 447
        • Dubberke ER
        • Carling P
        • Carrico R
        • et al.
        Strategies to prevent Clostridium difficile infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 Update.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014; 35: 628-645
        • Kelly SG
        • Yarrington M
        • Zembower TR
        • et al.
        Inappropriate Clostridium difficile Testing and Consequent Overtreatment and Inaccurate Publicly Reported Metrics.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016; 37: 1395-1400
        • Kara A
        • Tahir M
        • Snyderman W
        • Brinkman A
        • Fadel W
        • Dbeibo L.
        Why do clinicians order inappropriate Clostridium difficile testing? An exploratory study.
        Am J Infect Control. 2019; 47: 285-289
        • McDonald LC
        • Gerding DN
        • Johnson S
        • et al.
        Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).
        Clin Infect Dis. 2018; 66: e1-e48
        • Truong CY
        • Gombar S
        • Wilson R
        • et al.
        Real-Time Electronic Tracking of Diarrheal Episodes and Laxative Therapy Enables Verification of Clostridium difficile Clinical Testing Criteria and Reduction of Clostridium difficile Infection Rates.
        J Clin Microbiol. 2017; 55: 1276-1284
        • Lenz A
        • Davis G
        • Asmar H
        • Nahapetian A
        • Dingilian J
        • Nathan RV.
        Using a nurse-initiated bedside tool to decrease inappropriate testing for Clostridioides difficile in hospital settings.
        J Infect Prev. 2021; 22: 136-139
        • Madden GR
        • German Mesner I
        • Cox HL
        • et al.
        Reduced Clostridium difficile Tests and Laboratory-Identified Events With a Computerized Clinical Decision Support Tool and Financial Incentive.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018; 39: 737-740
        • Dunn AN
        • Radakovich N
        • Ancker JS
        • Donskey CJ
        • Deshpande A.
        The Impact of Clinical Decision Support Alerts on Clostridioides difficile Testing: A Systematic Review.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2021; 72: 987-994
      1. Control CfD. Strategies to prevent Clostridioides difficile Infection in Acute Care Facilities https://www.cdc.gov/cdiff/clinicians/cdi-prevention-strategies.html. Published 2021. Accessed August 26, 2022.

        • Murad YM
        • Perez J
        • Ybazeta G
        • et al.
        False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing.
        BMC Infect Dis. 2016; 16: 430
        • Green DA
        • Stotler B
        • Jackman D
        • Whittier S
        • Della-Latta P.
        Clinical characteristics of patients who test positive for Clostridium difficile by repeat PCR.
        J Clin Microbiol. 2014; 52: 3853-3855
      2. Network NHS. Multidrug-Resistant Organism & Clostridioides difficile Infection (MDRO/CDI) Module. In: NHSN, ed2022.

        • Welch BL.
        The generalisation of student's problems when several different population variances are involved.
        Biometrika. 1947; 34: 28-35
        • Khoury JA
        • Sistrunk WW
        • Hixson F
        • et al.
        Sustained reduction in rates of hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection using an automated electronic health record protocol.
        Am J Infect Control. 2018; 46: 542-548
        • Karlovich NS
        • Sata SS
        • Griffith B
        • et al.
        In pursuit of the holy grail: Improving C. difficile testing appropriateness with iterative electronic health record clinical decision support and targeted test restriction.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021; : 1-8
        • Mizusawa M
        • Small BA
        • Hsu YJ
        • et al.
        Prescriber Behavior in Clostridioides difficile Testing: A 3-Hospital Diagnostic Stewardship Intervention.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2019; 69: 2019-2021
        • Quan KA
        • Yim J
        • Merrill D
        • et al.
        Reductions in Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Rates Using Real-Time Automated Clinical Criteria Verification to Enforce Appropriate Testing.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018; 39: 625-627
        • Lyles CR
        • Handley MA
        • Ackerman SL
        • et al.
        Innovative Implementation Studies Conducted in US Safety Net Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
        Am J Med Qual. 2019; 34: 293-306
        • Roman BR
        • Yang A
        • Masciale J
        • Korenstein D.
        Association of Attitudes Regarding Overuse of Inpatient Laboratory Testing With Health Care Provider Type.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2017; 177: 1205-1207
        • Gupta R
        • Moriates C
        • Harrison JD
        • et al.
        Development of a high-value care culture survey: a modified Delphi process and psychometric evaluation.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2017; 26: 475-483