Implementation of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system: Learnings on how to maximize the investment

Published:December 27, 2022DOI:


      • Implementation of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system (EMS) is labor intensive
      • An EMS is helpful for identifying clinical practices to review for correct hand hygiene performance
      • Improvement in hand hygiene performance is aided by an EMS



      Electronic monitoring systems (EMS) for measuring hand hygiene performance have many advantages. Previous studies have shared results of EMS in individual units or single institutions, without many details of implementation. The implementation steps for house wide use of an EMS in 12 hospitals are described.


      Hospital resources used in this 3-year implementation included those for installation activities, initial education about the components and function of the EMS, evaluation of healthcare professionals’ processes related to hand hygiene, routine data feedback in a variety of methods, continuous coaching and training on the EMS, incentive programs and strong leadership support.


      Continual process improvement activities resulted in a 23% increase in hand hygiene performance, from 53% at baseline, to 76%.


      Implementation of an EMS required many resources beyond those for the technology, but resulted in measurable improvement in hand hygiene performance.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Naikoba S
        • Hayward A.
        The effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing handwashing in healthcare workers – a systematic review.
        J Hosp Infect. 2001; 47: 173-180
        • Pittet D
        • Sax H
        • Hugonnet S
        • Harbarth S.
        Cost implications of successful hand hygiene promotion.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004; 25: 264-266
        • Huis A
        • Schoonhoven L
        • Grol R
        • et al.
        Impact of a team and leaders-directed strategy to improve nurses’ adherence to hand hygiene guidelines: a cluster randomized trial.
        Int J Nurs Studies. 2013; 50: 464-474
        • Carboneau C
        • Benge E
        • Jaco MT
        • Robinson M.
        A lean Six Sigma team increases hand hygiene compliance and reduces hospital-acquired MRSA infections by 51%.
        J Healthc Qual. 2010; 32: 61-70
        • Hagel S
        • Reischke J
        • Kesselmeier M
        • et al.
        Quantifying the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance through comparing direct observation with automated hand hygiene monitoring.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015; 36: 957-962
        • Srigley JA
        • Furness CD
        • Baker GR
        • Gardam M.
        Quantification of the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance monitoring using an electronic monitoring system: a retrospective cohort study.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2014; 23: 974-980
        • Eckmann Bessert J
        • Behnke M
        • Gastmeier P
        • Ruden H
        Compliance with antiseptic hand rub use in intensive care units: the Hawthorne effect.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006; 27: 931-934
        • Gould D
        • Lindstrom H
        • Purssell E
        • Wigglesworth N.
        Electronic hand hygiene monitoring: accuracy, impact on the Hawthorne effect and efficiency.
        J Infect Prev. 2020; 21: 136-143
        • Limper H
        • Slawsky L
        • Garcia-Houchins S
        • et al.
        Assessment of an aggregate-level hand hygiene monitoring technology for measuring hand hygiene performance among healthcare personnel.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017; 38: 348-353
        • Boyce J.
        Electronica monitoring in combination with direct observations as a means to significantly improve hand hygiene compliance.
        Am J Infect Control. 2017; 45: 528-535
        • Cawthorne K
        • Cooke R.
        A survey of commercially available electronic hand hygiene monitoring systems and their impact on reducing healthcare-associated infections.
        J Hosp Infect. 2021; 111: 40-46
      1. The Joint Commission Resources Targets Solutions Tool for hand hygiene. Available at: Accessed November12, 2022.

      2. Clean Hands - Safe Hands. 2020. Using data to improve hospital efficiency and safety. Atlanta, GA. Available at: Accessed June10, 2022.

        • Pong S
        • Holliday P
        • Femie G.
        Secondary measures of hand hygiene performance in health care available with continuous electronic monitoring of individuals.
        Am J Infect Control. 2019; 47: 38-44
        • Benudis A
        • Stone S
        • Sait A
        • et al.
        Pitfalls and unexpected benefits of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system.
        Am J Infect Control. 2019; 47: 1102-1106
        • Iversen A
        • Stangerup M
        • From-Hansen M
        • et al.
        Light-guided nudging and data-driven performance feedback improve hand hygiene compliance among nurses and doctors.
        Am J Infect Control. 2021; 49: 733-739
        • Leis J
        • Powis J
        • McFeer A
        • et al.
        Introduction of group electronic monitoring of hand hygiene on inpatient units: a multicenter cluster randomized quality improvement study.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020; 71: e680-e685
        • Edmisten C
        • Hall C
        • Kernizan L
        • et al.
        Implementing an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system: lessons learned from community hospitals.
        Am J Infect Control. 2017; 45: 860-865