Advertisement
Major Article|Articles in Press

Effect of video camera monitoring feedback on hand hygiene compliance in neonatal intensive care unit, an interventional study

Published:January 02, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.12.011

      Highlights

      • Overall hand hygiene compliance before the intervention was low (44.1%) which was in line with other studies performed in intensive care units.
      • After our video camera hand hygiene surveillance, scenario based interactive education and feedback intervention, the overall hand hygiene and glove showed a non-significant improvement.
      • Only the before patient contact hand hygiene compliance rate increased significantly.
      • The improvements in hand hygiene behavior were not sustained in the long term (6 months after the intervention) follow period., illustrating the probable importance of continuous and frequent feedback and educations to sustain hand hygiene compliance.

      Abstract

      Background

      The purpose of this study was to determine whether use of a video camera surveillance system for hand hygiene (HH) monitoring, video-based education, and feedback could improve the HH compliance in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

      Methods and materials

      This was an interventional before-after trial conducted in a level-III NICU between July 2019 and June 2020. HH compliance was measured using randomly selected video-camera footage in the baseline, intervention, and maintenance periods. After the baseline, an intervention consisting of feedback and education with video scenarios was implemented. The primary outcome was change in HH compliance. The compliance rates were analyzed as an interrupted time series (ITS) with a segmented regression model adjusted for autocorrelation for each study period.

      Results

      We identified a total of 8335 HH indications. There were non significant increases in the total compliance rate (9.0%, 95% CI -2% to 20%) at the time of intervention and in the compliance rate after intervention (0.26%, 95% CI -0.31% to 0.84%) per day. The hand hygiene compliance before patient contact significantly increased (19.8%, 95% CI, 4.8%-34.8%). Incorrect glove use improved non-significantly with the intervention (-3.4%, 95% CI -13.4% to 6.7%).

      Conclusion

      In this study of HH monitoring using video-camera footage combined with an intervention including feedback and education, there were inconsistent improvements in HH compliance. However, these improvements were not sustained in the long term. Frequent feedback and education may be required to sustain high compliance.

      Graphical abstract

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to American Journal of Infection Control
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kingston L
        • O'Connell NH
        • Dunne CP
        Hand hygiene-related clinical trials reported since 2010: a systematic review.
        J Hosp Infect. 2016; 92: 309-320
      1. World Health Organization. The burden of health care-associated infection worldwide. A Summary; 2010. Accessed January 01, 2022. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/80135/9789241501507_eng.pdf. 2017

        • Yapicioglu H
        • Satar M
        • Ozcan K
        • et al.
        A 6-year prospective surveillance of healthcare-associated infections in a neonatal intensive care unit from southern part of Turkey.
        J Paediatr Child Health. 2010; 46: 337-342
        • Alp E
        • Orhan T
        • Kürkcü CA
        • Ersoy S
        • McLaws ML.
        The first six years of surveillance in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units in Turkey.
        Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2015; 4: 34
        • Demirdağ TB
        • Koç E
        • Tezer H
        • et al.
        The prevalence and diagnostic criteria of health-care associated infections in neonatal intensive care units in Turkey: A multicenter point-prevalence study.
        Pediatr & Neonatol. 2021; 62: 208-217
        • Ellingson K
        • Haas JP
        • Aiello AE
        • et al.
        Strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections through hand hygiene.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014; 35: S155-S178
        • Pittet D
        • Allegranzi B
        • Sax H
        • et al.
        Evidence-based model for hand transmission during patient care and the role of improved practices.
        Lancet Infect Dis. 2006; 6: 641-652
        • Erasmus V
        • Daha TJ
        • Brug H
        • et al.
        Systematic review of studies on compliance with hand hygiene guidelines in hospital care.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010; 31: 283
        • Clancy C
        • Delungahawatta T
        • Dunne CP.
        Hand hygiene-related clinical trials reported between 2014 and 2020: a comprehensive systematic review.
        J Hosp Infect. 2021; 111: 6
        • McLaws ML
        • Kwok YLA.
        Hand hygiene compliance rates: fact or fiction?.
        Am J Infect Control. 2018; 46: 876-880
        • World Health Organization
        • WHO Patient Safety
        Hand hygiene technical reference manual: to be used by health-care workers, trainers and observers of hand hygiene practices.
        World Health Organization, 2009 ([Internet] 2009 [Accessed October 24, 2019]. Available from:)
        • Sili U
        • Ay P
        • Bilgin H
        • Hidiroglu S
        • Korten V.
        Hand hygiene knowledge, perception and practice of healthcare workers in a Turkish university hospital intensive care unit.
        J Infect Develop Countries. 2019; 13: 744-747
        • Karaaslan A
        • Kepenekli Kadayifci E
        • Atıcı S
        • et al.
        Compliance of healthcare workers with hand hygiene practices in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: overt observation.
        Interdisciplin Perspect on Infect Dis. 2014; 5306478
        • Chhapola V
        • Brar R.
        Impact of an educational intervention on hand hygiene compliance and infection rate in a developing country neonatal intensive care unit.
        Int J Nurs Pract. 2015; 21: 486-492
        • Raskind CH
        • Worley S
        • Vinski J
        • Goldfarb J.
        Hand hygiene compliance rates after an educational intervention in a neonatal intensive care unit.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007; 28: 1096-1098
        • Brown J
        • Froese-Fretz A
        • Luckey D
        • Todd JK.
        High rate of hand contamination and low rate of hand washing before infant contact in a neonatal intensive care unit.
        Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996; 15: 908-910
        • Shah R
        • Patel DV
        • Shah K
        • Phatak A
        • Nimbalkar S.
        Video surveillance audit of hand-washing practices in a neonatal intensive care unit.
        Indian Pediatr. 2015; 52: 409-411
        • Shlomai NO
        • Rao S
        • Patole S.
        Efficacy of interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in neonatal units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015; 34: 887-897
        • Armellino D
        • Hussain E
        • Schilling ME
        • et al.
        Using high-technology to enforce low-technology safety measures: the use of third-party remote video auditing and real-time feedback in healthcare.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 54: 1-7
        • Sánchez-Carrillo LA
        • Rodríguez-López JM
        • Galarza-Delgado DÁ
        • et al.
        Enhancement of hand hygiene compliance among health care workers from a hemodialysis unit using video-monitoring feedback.
        Am J Infect Control. 2016; 44: 868-872
        • Boyce JM
        • Cooper T
        • Yin J
        • Li FY
        • Arbogast JW.
        Challenges encountered and lessons learned during a trial of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system.
        Am J Infect Control. 2019; 47: 1443-1448
        • Girou E
        • Chai SHT
        • Oppein F
        • et al.
        Misuse of gloves: the foundation for poor compliance with hand hygiene and potential for microbial transmission?.
        J Hosp Infect. 2004; 57: 162-169
        • Brotfain E
        • Livshiz-Riven I
        • Gushansky A
        • et al.
        Monitoring the hand hygiene compliance of health care workers in a general intensive care unit: use of continuous closed circle television versus overt observation.
        Am J Infect Control. 2017; 45: 849-854
        • Hagel S
        • Reischke J
        • Kesselmeier M
        • et al.
        Quantifying the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance through comparing direct observation with automated hand hygiene monitoring.
        Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015; 36: 957-962
        • Stewardson A
        • Sax H
        • Longet-Di Pietro S
        • Pittet D
        Impact of observation and analysis methodology when reporting hand hygiene data.
        J Hosp Infect. 2011; 4: 358-359