Assessment of urine collection technique for microbial culture

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      Two methods of urine collection—clean catch and midstream only—were compared in 200 samples (100 with each technique). There were no significant differences between the two collection methods with regard to number of positive culture results or types and counts of organisms isolated. There is little if any added benefit to special preparation for urine collection for culture.


        • Immergut MA
        • Gilbert EC
        • Frensilli FJ
        • Goble M
        The myth of the clean catch urine specimen.
        Urology. 1981; 17: 339-340
        • Morris RW
        • Watts MR
        • Reeves DS
        Perineal cleansing before midstream urine: a necessary ritual.
        Lancet. 1979; 2: 158-159
        • Leisure MK
        • Dudley SM
        • Donowitz LG
        Does a clean-catch urine sample reduce bacterial contamination?.
        N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 289
        • Murray PR
        • Baron J
        • Pfaller M
        • Tenover F
        • Yolken R
        6th ed. Manual of clinical microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C1995
        • Lohr JA
        • Donowitz LG
        • Dudley SM
        Bacterial contamination rates for non-clean-catch and clean-catch midstream urine collections in boys.
        J Pediatr. 1986; 109: 659-670
        • Lipsky BA
        • Inui TS
        • Plorde JJ
        • Berger RE
        Is the clean-catch midstream void procedure necessary for obtaining urine culture specimens from men?.
        Am J Med. 1984; 76: 257-262
        • Lohr JA
        • Donowitz LG
        • Dudley SM
        Bacterial contamination rates in voided urine collections in girls.
        J Pediatr. 1989; 114: 91-93
        • Cavagnolo R
        Evaluation of incubation times for urine cultures.
        J Clin Microbiol. 1995; 33: 1954-1956